Connect with us

Entertainment

The R-Rated, Extremely Graphic Thriller That's A Sadistic Game Of Cat And Mouse

By Robert Scucci
| Published

They say that revenge is a dish best served cold, but that’s physically impossible in 2008’s Bone Dry, a chase thriller set entirely in the punishing desert. The marketing ahead of the film’s release pitches the viewing experience as “Deliverance meets Duel,” but if anything, it reminds me of another low-budget film called Drifter that came out the same year. The main difference between the two films is that Drifter leans more into the Saw film series, with a group of people waking up in the desert and being forced to endure a series of challenges if they want to survive.

In Bone Dry, on the other hand, we’re introduced to a man being hunted by a ruthless antagonist who seems to be having just a little too much fun torturing him as hours turn into days under the brutal desert sun. Funny enough, and this is a pattern I’ve noticed in a lot of low-budget movies, both films feature protagonists dressed in business-casual attire. I’m not sure if this is meant to make them appear more legitimate, or to drive home the point that wearing synthetic fabric blends in the middle of a heat wave is about as unpleasant as it gets.

Bone Dry 2008

Though there are conflicting reports on how much it cost writer-director Brett A. Hart to film Bone Dry, it’s clearly a low-budget effort, with estimates suggesting it probably cost around a million dollars, potentially topping out closer to $5 million. Fortunately, those limitations don’t really show on screen because the on-location shooting does most of the visual heavy lifting for this particular game of cat and mouse.

Two Guys And A Gun, Having All Sorts Of Fun

Bone Dry 2008

Like most survival or chase thrillers, there’s really not much to Bone Dry, and that’s the point. The less you know about it, the better.

Here’s what you absolutely need to know before deciding if it’s the next thing you fire up on Tubi. A man named Eddie (Luke Goss) is chased through the desert by a psychopath named Jimmy (Lance Henriksen). Jimmy gets a sick thrill out of torturing Eddie, giving him just enough water to survive along with very simple instructions to keep walking North or be executed. Along the way, Eddie is subjected to Jimmy’s sadistic machinations, which include being knocked unconscious and handcuffed naked to a very tall cactus, buried up to his neck in hot, rocky sand, and given water bottles that turn out to be filled with salt water.

Bone Dry 2008

As time passes, Eddie becomes increasingly delirious, but through his hallucinations we catch glimpses of the backstory that brought these two men together in the first place. It slowly becomes clear that Jimmy has a personal vendetta against Eddie, for reasons that aren’t yet clear to Eddie, making the hunter’s motives all the more menacing.

A Low-Budget, But Very Resourceful Thriller

Breaking Bad creator Vince Gilligan once said that the real star of the show was Albuquerque, New Mexico. Some of the series’ best shots come from the rolling clouds, hazy sun, and thick air. Bone Dry, which was filmed on location across desert regions in California, Utah, and Arizona, boasts a similar aesthetic, but it’s the only aesthetic it boasts. There are no city streets or sound stages here, just the pure, punishing heat of an unforgiving desert landscape.

Bone Dry 2008

While the conflict is immediately clear in Bone Dry, the film escalates smoothly as we learn more about its two principal characters. The stakes remain largely the same throughout, but your perception of each man evolves along the way, making for an engaging watch.

The only real bone I have to pick with the film is minor, and when you consider the budget, probably inevitable. Eddie wanders through the desert for days, sustains a significant number of injuries, and just keeps going. In real life, I imagine he’d be reduced to a walking boil after a single day, especially after the cactus scene, but he keeps pushing forward. I’m not a huge fan of hyper-realistic gore, so this was actually a relief, but if you’re watching Bone Dry for realism, you’ll need to suspend some disbelief.

Bone Dry 2008

The real story is about the two men, the hunt, and the inciting incident that brought them together in the first place. If you want to find out what that incident is, all you have to do is fire up Bone Dry on Tubi, where it’s streaming for free.


source

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

I tested the top MacBook alternatives: See which Windows PCs actually beat Apple

The 2026 Dell XPS 14 is a stylish investment for aesthetic-forward power users — I’m thinking content creators who might also be occasional gamers. You’re probably wishing the 14-inch MacBook Pro was even sleeker and a little more portable, and you may be getting impatient waiting for Apple’s touchscreen OLED upgrade. You’re definitely open to carrying around dongles.

I tested two configurations of the handsome XPS 14. The one I recommend as the best MacBook Pro alternative is an upper mid-tier model with an Intel Core Ultra X7 358H processor and a dazzling tandem OLED touchscreen (an optional upgrade). It’s no battery life champ, but it keeps pace with the base Pro in multi-core workloads, and its integrated GPU is excellent for demanding creative software and casual gaming.

The XPS 14 is easily one of the most elegant laptops I’ve ever encountered. Dell trimmed down its all-aluminum design for 2026, making it a touch thinner and nearly half a pound lighter than a 14-inch Pro. It’s available in two MacBook-y finishes: graphite and shimmer (coming later this year). Its lattice keyboard takes some adjusting to if you’re used to regular island-style keyboards, but it translates to a modern, minimalist look. Its seamless glass haptic touchpad looks equally clean. Its speakers are above-average for a Windows laptop — they’re just a little more echoey than a MacBook’s.

The XPS 14’s 2.8K OLED display is a $150 upcharge that I can endorse. It’s not as bright or crisp as a MacBook Pro’s Liquid Retina XDR display, but it’s more vibrant and just as smooth. (The standard IPS version is much duller in comparison.) Keep in mind that OLED won’t be a thing on a Mac until late 2026 at the soonest.

The Core Ultra X7 chip is a close rival of Apple’s M5 chip when you work it hard. It doesn’t feel as snappy in single-core scenarios, but trails the current MacBook Pro by only four percent when used for multi-core tasks. (That’s nothing.) What’s more, the Core Ultra X7’s Intel Arc B390 iGPU is comparable to an entry-level discrete graphics card. It’s perfectly capable of running graphically taxing titles like Cyberpunk 2077 with the help of games’ AI upscaling tech.

The XPS 14’s stamina is lacking compared to the M5 MacBook Pro, though it really depends on what you’re using it for. It held out for 10 hours and 19 minutes in our video rundown test, which is a full workday at least, but not great. (Its Apple counterpart ran for over 21 hours in the same test.) That said, its 120Hz OLED display dips down to just 20Hz when you’re viewing static content, so it should last much longer when it’s not looping a video.

If you want an XPS 14 with MacBook-beating battery life in almost any scenario, look into the $1,999.99 base model with a Core Ultra 5 325 chip. It lasted 22 hours on the dot in our video rundown test, and its refresh rate can drop to a mere 1Hz for static content. Just know that you’ll sacrifice a good chunk of power: It offers 35 percent worse multi-core performance than the Core Ultra X7 version. Speed-wise, it’s most akin to an M2 MacBook Air from 2022. (The cheaper Dell 14S with the Core Ultra 7 355 chip performs slightly better and lasts even longer, FWIW.)

source

Continue Reading

Entertainment

I put the Camp Snap 2 to the ultimate test: Capturing my honeymoon

Table of Contents

In preparation for my honeymoon, getting a camera was at the top of my list. Although my iPhone 17 Pro Max takes next-level photos, I wanted to be able to stay off my phone and stay in the moment. I needed something beginner-friendly, and while I love the look of film, I wanted the convenience of digital. That’s where the Camp Snap comes in.

Originally designed for summer campers who want a digital camera to capture camp memories, the Camp Snap is screen-free. However, the Camp Snap has attracted an audience beyond summer campers, thanks to its nostalgic-looking photos.

I own the Camp Snap, but when I tried the Camp Snap 2, I totally fell in love. It was the perfect camera to bring on my honeymoon, and now I have the sweetest photos to look back on.

Camp Snap 2 at a glance

The Camp Snap 2

The Camp Snap 2 is more high-tech than it looks.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

The Camp Snap 2 is a screen-free digital camera, which costs $69.95. It has a playful, vintage look, but it’s not a gimmick. It has flash and five filters and is exceptionally easy to use. Without a screen, you stay in the moment; however, it does make using the filters a bit of a guessing game. It still creates stunning digital photos with a film-like look. Uploading photos is straightforward, requiring only a USB-C connection to get them on your phone or computer, even on the go.

A camera made for amateurs

The back of a Camp Snap 2

The only screen on the Camp Snap 2 displays your photo count and filters.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

You know when someone hands you their camera, and there are so many buttons that they need to point out the right one to hit snap? Well, that’s not an issue on the Camp Snap 2 because there are so few buttons, it’s obvious which ones do what. There are exactly three buttons: an on/off/flash switch, the shoot button on top of the camera, and a filter button.

The top of the Camp Snap 2.

There’s no guessing on which button does what on the Camp Snap 2.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

There’s a viewfinder and a tiny screen that displays the photo count and the filter the camera is set to. There are no lens details to futz with; you just turn it on and shoot. There’s no learning curve to worry about. It also takes photos in a 3:4 or 4:3 ratio.

This meant that on our honeymoon, we could whip out the camera, snap the shot, and go. Plus, if we ever handed the camera to someone so we could get a couple shot, it was self-explanatory. It has a little shutter sound that clicks when the photo is taken, so you know you’ve got the shot.

The photos have a sweet, nostalgic feel to them

A church

Camp Snap 2 photos look like film but still have the convenience of digital.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

Camp Snap’s photos are just as charming as the camera itself looks. It has a vintage-inspired design, and the Camp Snap 2 now comes in colorful jelly shades.

The photos the camera takes also have a nostalgic look, most reminiscent of photos from a disposable camera digitized. It looks like film, but it has the convenience of digital. Don’t expect crisp, detailed photos; everything has a slight fuzz to it, but that’s part of the style to just embrace.

Camp Snap 2

A lake in Greece

Lake Vouliagmeni captured on the Camp Snap 2.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

iPhone 17 Pro Max

A lake in Greece

Lake Vouliagmeni captured on my iPhone.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

Without a screen, you’re always taking a gamble on a bad shot, but since it’s digital, it’s not the same stakes as with a film camera. But out of the hundreds of photos I took, none of them were true duds.

Camp Snap 2

A port in Crete

On the Camp Snap 2, the foreground is too dark compared to the sunset.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

iPhone 17 Pro Max

A port in Crete

The iPhone gives a more balanced photo.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

It doesn’t perform well on high-contrast images. For example, a crowded street in the shade with a bright sunset behind it lost much of the detail that a similar photo I took on my iPhone did. As long as you have bright, well-balanced sunlight, you’ll have beautiful photos. If not, make sure to turn on flash.

Upload to any device on the go

A winery in Greece

With its easy uploads, I could look at photos from the day as soon as I took them.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

On vacation, I didn’t have a full computer setup, just my phone and a USB-C cord, but that’s enough to upload photos. While we were traveling between destinations, I plugged the Camp Snap 2 into my phone, watched the photos appear in the Photos app, uploaded them, and even deleted them to free up space on the camera. It was so simple, required no WiFi connection, and was really quick.

While I tested the Camp Snap on iOS and Mac devices, it’s also compatible with Android and PC.

No worries about battery life or storage

There were plenty of devices I had to worry about charging during our honeymoon: my phone, iPad, and portable fan. But the Camp Snap wasn’t one of them. It has extensive battery life, and one charge gets you 500 photos. With the included MicroSD storage, the camera stores 2,000 photos; however, if you need even more space, you can swap out cards.

There’s a bit of a learning curve with the filters

A person standing against a wall

This is the standard shot taken on the Camp Snap 2, without filter.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

A person standing on a dirt road.

Photos taken in bright light will have a darker tint to them even without filter.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

The biggest upgrade between the Camp Snap and Camp Snap 2 is the inclusion of filters. The Camp Snap 2 comes with six built-in filters: standard, vintage 1–3, analog, and black & white. The filters are a nice touch, but I never found myself reaching for them.

A dog in black and white.

Trying out the filters with my dog, Milly.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

Since there’s no screen, you can’t see what the filter looks like until you upload it later. This means you’ll need to spend a little time playing around with them to see how they look and what you like.

Is the Camp Snap 2 worth it?

A beach in Greece

The Camp Snap 2 adds instant nostalgia to photos.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable

The Camp Snap 2 is 100 percent worth it. At $69.95, it’s about half the price of a standard digital camera, and although it definitely has some drawbacks, like no screen or zoom, it makes up for them with ease and charm. It’s so easy to use, whether you’re an amateur photographer or a summer camper. The upload process is just as simple, too.

source

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Review: The unbeatable M5 MacBook Air might be too powerful for its own good

Table of Contents

At a glance

Key specs: A speedy M5 chip, Touch ID, HDR Liquid Retina Display, and Neural Accelerators to support AI workloads — all in a body that’s just 2.7 pounds and 0.44 inches thick

New starting price: 13-inch model is $1,299 (originally $1,099); 15-inch model is $1,499 (originally $1,299)

Colors: Midnight black, sky blue, silver, starlight

Our 100-word review: “The M5 MacBook Air is an impressive piece of machinery. It’s incredibly thin and light, and I’m a big fan of macOS 26 Tahoe and Liquid Glass, no matter what the haters say. The default screensaver that plays is completely mesmerizing, and sometimes I find myself staring at it for minutes on end, enjoying a nice moment of zen in the middle of a workday. On top of that, you get all the premium features you expect in a modern MacBook. My one caveat: If I already had an M3 or M4 MacBook Air, I’d probably hold onto it for awhile longer.”


Apple MacBook Air (M5): Our updated review

The newest MacBook Air from Apple is a damn near-perfect machine. And for a few glorious days in late May, when it was discounted to just $899 at Amazon, it was a true 10/10 product. Unfortunately, thanks to the global memory crisis, Apple has since increased the starting price of this laptop from $1,099 to $1,299, and that changes how we feel about this machine.

To be clear, from an engineering, user experience, performance, and design standpoint, the M5 MacBook Air is nearly flawless.

And as a long-time product reviewer, I try to avoid using words like “perfect” and “flawless” in my reviews at all costs. But after spending five months with this laptop, it keeps impressing me.

In my initial review of the M5 MacBook Air, I wondered whether this laptop was actually too powerful for its own good. I still think it’s overpowered (and thus slightly overpriced) for the average Air customer — especially after the recent price increase — but this is undoubtedly one of the best laptops and MacBooks in the world right now.

So, after stress-testing the newest MacBook Air — and watching many hours of Dropout TV shows after work — I’m ready to lock in this product as a Mashable Choice Award winner.

The new MacBook Air (M5): By the numbers

m5 macbook air open to home screen

Liquid Glass looks particularly good on the MacBook Liquid Retina display.
Credit: Joe Maldonado / Mashable

For this review, I tested the 15.3-inch version of the MacBook Air with 1TB of storage. You may see some slight variations in performance with the 13.6-inch model. Overall, this laptop has impressive specifications:

  • Processor: M5 (10-core CPU, 8‑core GPU, Neural Accelerators)

  • Colors: Sky blue, silver, starlight, midnight black

  • Memory: 16GB (configurable to 24GB or 32GB)

  • Storage: 512GB SSD (configurable to 1TB, 2TB, or 4TB)

  • Display: 13.6 or 15.3-inch Liquid Retina display

  • Video playback: HDR with Dolby Vision, HDR10+/HDR10, and HLG

  • Resolution: 2,560 x 1,664

  • Brightness: 500 nits

  • Battery life: 17 hours, 40 minutes in video playback test

  • Ports: MagSafe 3 charging port, 3.5 mm headphone jack, DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 4, USB-C 4

  • Connectivity: Apple N1 chip, WiFi 7, Bluetooth 6

  • Webcam: 12MP Center Stage camera with Desk View

  • Dimensions: 11.97 x 8.46 x 0.44 inches

  • Weight: 2.7 pounds

The MacBook Air (M5) performs like a Pro

macbook air m5 open to homescreen


Credit: Joe Maldonado / Mashable

Despite all the accolades I’ve given it, the new MacBook Air is definitely an iterative upgrade in many respects. Like its predecessor, it comes in 13.6 and 15.3-inch models, and you can choose from silver, sky blue, starlight, and midnight black. At a mere 0.44 inches thick and a measly 2.7 pounds, it’s remarkably thin and lightweight, yet it never feels fragile or flimsy in the slightest. On the contrary, the MacBook’s signature all-aluminum body makes it a very durable laptop.

The big difference, of course, is the M5 chip inside. When we put it through the Geekbench 6 benchmark test, it scored 16,099 on the multi-core test. On the single-core test, it scored 4,025, even higher than we expected. The multi-core score puts it within spitting distance of the M5 MacBook Pro released late last year. For almost all intents and purposes, it is a MacBook Pro. Minus the fans, of course.

The single-core score is a good proxy for everyday performance (what our laptop expert calls “snappiness”), and that lines up perfectly with my testing. When exporting or importing large files, it barely flinches. It can handle video editing software, complex Apple Shortcuts, and even some gaming.

Is the MacBook Air (M5) too powerful?

Apple introduced the M1 chip in 2020, its first in-house processor, kicking off a revolution in the laptop world. The M1 chip destroyed the competition, and the original M1 MacBook Air is probably the most award-winning laptop ever. It’s a legendary device that was still popular six years later, an unheard-of feat.

As Apple introduced the M2, M3, M4, M5, and now M5 Pro and Pro Max chips, the MacBook Air and Pro laptops have become extremely powerful. The new M5 Max chip scored 29,000 on the Geekbench 6 test, making it so powerful that pro laptop reviewers struggled to test it properly. I know professional film editors who are still working on M1 and M2 laptops. And in 2024, my colleague Stan Schroeder wrote that “Apple’s M series chips are too good for their own good.” That’s doubly true today.

The new MacBook Air also has a much higher starting price of $1,299, or $300 more than the previous generation. Yes, Apple doubled the starting storage, but Apple experts like Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman say that’s just Apple’s way of softening the blow of a price increase.

Traditionally, the MacBook Air has been a popular laptop for college students, early-career professionals, and more casual users. If you’re running complex programs like Final Cut Pro, DaVinci Resolve, or Adobe Suite, then you opt for the Pro.

On the Geekbench 6 tests we ran, this laptop achieved 92.5 percent of the power of the latest MacBook Pro. Only hardcore superusers are going to come close to taxing the M5 Air, and those kinds of users will probably be buying a Pro or Mac Studio anyway.

So, in a world with the $699 MacBook Neo — a surprisingly capable laptop that matches the M1 Air in performance — I’m not quite sure we needed a newer, even more powerful Air. The recipe was already just right.

So, am I seriously telling you that this MacBook would be better if it were worse? Kind of! I may be in the minority on this one, but I think the average Air buyer would be better off with a slightly less powerful but more affordable device. I miss the days when the M3 and M4 Air went on sale for $799 or $899.

Unfortunately, laptops are getting more expensive across the board. The top alternatives to the MacBook Air have also gotten price increases in 2026.

MacBook Air (M5) review: Speakers, display, and design

m5 macbook air display on stylized background


Credit: Joe Maldonado / Mashable

As I mentioned earlier, I’ve been using this laptop to watch Dropout TV, which isn’t available on my smart TV, sadly. Not only does it have enough processing power for most workloads, but it’s also a great entertainment laptop. The HDR Liquid Retina Display looks fantastic, even if it’s not quite at OLED level.

Similarly, the speakers sound strong and clear when listening to music or watching TV shows and movies. When using the four-speaker sound system, the laptop supports spatial audio and Dolby Atmos; spatial audio is also supported when listening with AirPods.

For video calls or voice recording, you’ll benefit from a three-mic array, directional beamforming, voice isolation, and a 12MP Center Stage camera.

Of course, as strong as they are, none of these components has been upgraded from last year’s M4 MacBook Air.

MacBook Air (M5) review: Battery life

m5 macbook air back shell


Credit: Joe Maldonado / Mashable

When testing a laptop’s battery, we evaluate how long it lasts while using the laptop as our daily driver — doing work, browsing the web, streaming music and TV. And we’ve been able to get consistent all-day performance out of this device. However, we also test the battery life during video playback. (We conduct a battery rundown test by playing the 1080p version of Tears of Steel on loop, at 50 percent brightness and 50 percent volume.) And this is the one area where the new MacBook Air didn’t quite meet our expectations.

Typically, we expect new MacBooks to achieve 19 hours of battery life (the smaller and more affordable MacBook Neo is the exception). However, when running down the 15-inch MacBook Air (M5), the battery only lasted 17 hours and 40 minutes. That’s more than enough power for virtually all use cases, but we have tested other MacBook and Windows laptops with better battery life.

close-up of ports on m5 macbook air

The M5 Air has two Thunderbolt 4 ports, a MagSafe charging port, and a headphones jack.
Credit: Joe Maldonado / Mashable

M5 MacBook Air review: Is it worth it?

As much as I hate the new $1,299 price, this laptop is definitely still worth buying.

Sure, for $899, or even $949, I’d find this laptop irresistible, and it would get a perfect 5.0 score from me. But here’s the bottom line: For the new $1,299 price — and with Windows laptops also getting price hikes — this laptop still justifies its price with premium components, the newest WiFi and Bluetooth tech, and a fast chip with no true competition in the Windows market.

Personally, I’d wait and see what this laptop’s new sale price will be during events like Black Friday. Before the price hike, it was discounted to $899 to $949, but I suspect we won’t see this laptop for under $1,000 for a long while, if ever. So, if you have the coin, and if you want near-MacBook-Pro-level performance but in a lighter and more portable body, then spring for the new and improved Air.

$1,049
at Amazon

$1,099
Save $50

 


source

Continue Reading