Entertainment
The Roborock Saros 20 handily beats 2025s Saros 10R. But hopefully, the Saros 20 Sonic is even better.
Table of Contents
The 2026 version of my favorite robot vacuum from last year has arrived: As of March 23, the $1,5999.99 Roborock Saros 20 is available to buy in the U.S.
This is hardly a matter of whether the Saros 20 is better than the Saros 10R — from a technical standpoint, it literally is. As the direct new version of the Saros 10R, the Saros 20 is obviously packed with several specs upgrades over its predecessor. So in my at-home testing, I’m considering whether I’m as excited about the Saros 20 in 2026 as I was about the Saros 10R in 2025.
What’s special (or not) about the Roborock Saros 20?
The premium robot vacuum market is much more crowded than it was last year, so the Saros 20 has to work harder to stand out. The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete is extremely similar in cleaning capabilities, ultra-slim design, and price. The Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow has weaker suction and a completely different style of mopping, but is still a fantastic vacuum from the same brand at a much chiller price point. Both of those have been on the market for at least a month, taking a bit of edge off the Saros 20’s debut.
And then there’s the Roborock Saros 20 Sonic, which is set to release later this spring. “Sonic” refers to a vibrating D-shaped mopping pad like the Saros 10 had, but this one isn’t relegated to the vacuum’s circular body. It shares most of its other features with the Saros 20. Still, I can’t assess the Saros 20 in a vacuum when I know there’s another version out soon.
A tale of two robot vacuums with arms: How the Dreame Cyber 10 could beat the Roborock Saros Z70
At any rate, the Saros 20 has a few main improvements over the 10R. Not only does its 36,000 Pa suction power topple the Saros 10R’s 22,000 Pa, but it’s now the strongest suction power on the market by a hair (the Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete has 35,000 Pa). The Saros 20 is also outfitted with the AdaptiLift Chassis 3.0: a legged tri-wheel system that can hoist the vacuum body over thick thresholds up to 3.46 inches, like floor type changes, U-shaped chair legs, or plush rugs. (That’s a big theme this year.) The Saros 20’s small obstacle avoidance feels lightyears ahead of the Saros 10R’s.
It was a pleasant surprise to see that the Saros 20 costs $1,599.99 — the same debut price as last year’s Saros 10 and Saros 10R models. You’re getting an extra 14,000 Pa of suction and better navigation for the same price someone paid last year. If you already have a Roborock, you can save up to $1,050 on the Saros 20 by trading in the old one.
The Saros 20’s small obstacle avoidance is phenomenal
The Saros 20 uses the same StarSight 2.0 navigational system that the Saros 10 did. This alternative to traditional LiDAR got a lot of marketing hype last year, but in my testing, it wasn’t any better at avoiding small obstacles than other robot vacuums I was testing. I expected the Saros 20 to be similarly fine, but I’ve actually been blown away by its accuracy — there’s no question that the Saros 20 has a far deeper understanding of the various items that could pop up on the floor.
This is what your vacuum app looks like when you don’t have a shoe rack.
Credit: Screenshot / Roborock
I had to laugh at the Saros 20 catching me and my cat watching it vacuum.
Credit: Screenshot / Roborock
I think this is the first time a robot vacuum in my apartment has had a 100 percent obstacle avoidance rate for multiple days on end. The Saros 20 knows that a shoe is a shoe, a reusable grocery bag is a bag, and an extension cord or charger is a cord. It’ll sweep or scrub right up against the shoes or bags without snatching them up, but keeps its distance from cords to stay on the safe side. Its acute peripheral vision even clocks that the rolling desk chair is a chair type that’s easy to get stuck in, maneuvering back to the dock accordingly.
Is the Roborock Saros 20 good on carpet?
The Saros 20 has had generally reliable rug performance so far, but it hasn’t been as foolproof as I expected for 36,000 Pa.
Its two standout tests involved dried quinoa dumped from the bag onto the kitchen Ruggable (the printed flatweave texture) and a giant field of dryer lint dragged around the tufted living room rug. I had to get down on the floor to find stragglers from either mess. The lint roller test in the living room only revealed a few stray cat hairs and the fuzzies that shed off the rug constantly.
Some lint tufts were loose, some were pushed down into the rug fibers.
Credit: Leah Stodart / Mashable
I let this rug go un-vacuumed for days to test the Saros 20, so this is pretty impressive.
Credit: Leah Stodart / Mashable
The Saros 20 also did a great job of sucking spilled pancake mix off of that flat rug. However, its performance on powder and small debris was iffy on a fluffier rug. It left behind a considerable amount of protein mix and oats, which the Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete had no problem clearing afterward.
The ability to clean a bathroom without getting into an altercation with a bath mat is rare, but an extension of rug performance nonetheless. The AdaptiLift Chassis definitely works as intended in that regard — several times, I’ve watched the Saros 20 lift and tilt the vacuum body to skirt over the corner flaps instead of dragging them underneath.
Is the Roborock Saros 20 good on hard floors?
The Saros 20’s dual spinning mopping pad system is nearly identical to the Saros 10R’s, but that’s not a bad thing. Though a few roller mop robot vacuums I’ve tested can actually mop closer to walls than I expected, the length of the roller prohibits them from mopping closely in 90-degree angles (the entire roller needs to be pulled in to change directions). Corner precision is much higher when there are two round spinning pads that can move independently of each other.
If you’re picky about dusty corners or sticky spots near the kitchen cabinets, your ideal robot vacuum and mop combo will have this hinged spinning mop pad system. These pads are also thin enough to scoot into super tight gaps near the floor, like under the bottom shelf of my island/bar cart. A disgusting amount of dust bunnies and dirt from the front door gathers right under it, but a cylindrical roller mop definitely can’t swipe under that one-inch clearance.
A taller robot vacuum can’t get under low-clearance furniture and cabinets.
Credit: Leah Stodart / Mashable
The Saros 20 easily cleans under cabinets.
Credit: Leah Stodart / Mashable
The Saros 20’s overall height would make it a great pick for homes with low-clearance furniture. It measures a little bit over three inches tall, which is well short enough to fully clean under my TV stand and bed frame. The same goes for cleaning under the overhangs of kitchen cabinets and appliances: If a robot vacuum can’t fit underneath to tackle those daily crumbs and splatters, it’s always a no from me. I don’t want to live a life where I can’t simply push crumbs off the counter and let a vacuum deal with it.
I knew the Saros 20 would ace that test, snatching up between 98 and 99 percent of sprinkles, shredded cheese, and some pinches of basil under the counter on the hardwood kitchen floor. It has also reliably kept up with its litter box area duties on hardwood and on tile in the bathroom, consistently picking up around 97 percent of kitty litter and litter dust.
I really have a newfound appreciation for ultra-slim robot vacuums after testing (and always having to rescue) the Dyson Spot+Scrub Ai. It’s nearly an inch taller than models like the Saros 20 and Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete, which is enough to get itself wedged under my dishwasher or bottom kitchen drawer during almost every clean.
It feels so good to watch a robot vacuum fit under the Litter-Robot step.
Credit: Leah Stodart / Mashable
Sansa is shocked at the height difference between the Dyson Spot+Scrub Ai (left) and Roborock Saros 20 (right).
Credit: Leah Stodart / Mashable
Bonus test: Could the Roborock Saros 20 be used in a hair salon?
It also seemed appropriate to give the big, fancy 36,000 Pa suction a harder test than my usual robot vacuum obstacle course entails. After giving a friend a quick at-home buzz cut (no, I don’t know what I’m doing), I decided to see how the Saros 20 would handle the mess of hair clippings.
I’d typically reserve hair clippings cleanup for powerful stick vacuum testing.
Credit: Leah Stodart / Mashable
The Saros 20 dragged this clump to the rug edge, then couldn’t snatch it up.
Credit: Leah Stodart / Mashable
The Saros 20 picked up about 90 percent of the hair, but simply could not wrangle a few of the bigger clumps after four or five tries. The damp mopping cloths were integral during the second pass, wiping up the layer of fine, loose hairs that were initially missed in plain vacuum mode. (And that’s why hair salons can’t ditch the classic broom and dustpan.) The performance wasn’t perfect, but a vast majority of the mistakes were ones that could only be avoided by a human with a manual vacuum. To be fair, the Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete missed those clumps, too.
Factors I’m keeping an eye on
I shouldn’t have had to send the Saros 20 back for a third pass as often as I did, especially for being the strongest robot vacuum one can buy right now. While it was typically able to throw together a quite wholesome clean after three tries, most people aren’t observing their vacuum like I am to know whether a third pass is needed. Shouldn’t a vacuum this expensive be better at conducting some sort of “before and after” check?
My kitchen floor felt greasy after testing the Saros 20’s effectiveness on condiments like ranch and sesame oil. Maybe I’ve been spoiled with roller mops that rinse themselves as they’re cleaning. But now, it feels unsanitary for non-roller mops to not go back to wash the mops every three minutes. The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete doesn’t have self-rinsing mopping pads, either, but at least it mops with hot water.
As the user, avoiding this isn’t rocket science: For larger spills that you don’t want dragged across the floor, you just need to enact a target zone cleaning rather than letting it tackle the whole room. Maybe I need to let the AI stain detection cook for another week or so. But right now, I don’t feel confident sending the Saros 20 over a spill larger than a dime-sized droplet.
That doesn’t mean I would recommend buying the Saros 10R over the Saros 20. (Even though the Saros 10R goes on sale for $999.99 now, I’d tell you to just spend that same amount on the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Flow.) Though I feel a little let down by the sequel to my favorite, I still have high hopes for the Saros 20 Sonic to be one of the best robot vacuums of 2026.
From YouTubers and TikTok stars to streamers and podcasters, Mashable talks to creators about how they built their platforms, the gear they swear by, and the trends they see coming next. Read more of our creator coverage, meet The Mashable 101 to discover the internet’s most exciting voices, and tell us about your favorite creators today.
Entertainment
Starfleet Academy’s Most Progressive Character Is Secretly Star Trek's Most Offensive
By Chris Snellgrove
| Published
Now that Starfleet Academy has been canceled, its fans have been fondly reminiscing about what they see as the show’s better qualities. Arguably, the best thing about the show was its colorful characters, whose diversity reflected the ideals of Star Trek as a whole. However, some critics felt the show went a little too far with Jay-Den, the gay, pacifist Klingon. Accordingly, this became another culture war flashpoint, with SFA superfans claiming that anyone who dislikes Jay-Den’s portrayal is just a bigot who never really understood what this franchise was about.
The truth is, there was a problem with this character’s portrayal, but not in the way the show’s biggest fans or its biggest haters could have guessed. You see, there’s nothing wrong with Starfleet Academy prominently featuring the first gay Klingon in Star Trek history. But the writers went about Jay-Den’s characterization in such a way that the show’s most progressive character accidentally became the most offensive.
The Accidental Caricature
Ironically enough, one of the reasons that Jay-Den became the most offensive character on Starfleet Academy is that the writers kept putting hats on top of hats to make him a uniquely progressive character. You see, he’s not just a gay Klingon, but he’s also an aspiring nurse who is a complete pacifist. Oh, and his parents are polyamorous (today was a good day for monogamy to die).
When I first heard that the new Star Trek show would feature a gay Klingon character, I assumed it would be a more traditional, Worf-like Klingon who is simply into dudes rather than gals. Making the character an aspiring medical officer was a confusing choice, but it still made a kind of sense; after all, a warrior culture like the Klingons must have battlefield medics. But then the writers made Jay-Den a Klingon pacifist (completely unheard of in previous lore), put him in a skirt, and did the shocked Pikachu face at the fact that old-school Trek fans disliked him.
Hello, Nurse!
Starfleet Academy made Jay-Den completely different from other Klingons in every way except his face. This is, understandably, offensive to Star Trek fans who expected him to act like a Klingon rather than simply look like one. But it’s also arguably offensive to those expecting a truly progressive character because Jay-Den ended up being weirdly half-baked as a person. He was ultimately nothing more than a set of half-assed progressive signifiers that transformed him into a caricature that leaned on offensive stereotypes.
I would bet my last bar of gold-pressed latinum that the Starfleet Academy writers thought they had struck gold by making Jay-Den the 32nd-century equivalent of a nurse. However, what they failed to consider is that, to 21st-century viewers, the “gay nurse” is actually a very offensive stereotype. It’s rooted in patriarchal, old-school homophobia and assumes that caretaking is a feminine activity. Writers often perpetuate the stereotype by making nurses gay, effectively confirming the homophobic assumption that male nurses can’t be “real” (i.e., heterosexual) men.
In retrospect, I can’t help but think that making a member of Star Trek’s most famous warrior race into a gay pacifist was a decision to play things safe. A hugely muscled, highly aggressive, bloodthirsty warrior who just happened to be gay is the kind of thing that makes people very, very nervous. By making Jay-Den gay and a pacifist and a nurse, Paramount effectively reassured sponsors, execs, and traditional fans (groups comprised mostly of older, white men) that the strong Black character couldn’t hurt them.
The Diversity Is The Character (And Why That’s A Bad Thing)
As I said before, Starfleet Academy is, by certain metrics, the most progressive Star Trek show ever made. Unfortunately, the writers made a pretty crucial mistake with Jay-Den: they made his sexuality and other progressive aspects very nearly the sum total of his character.
To see what I mean, look back at Stamets and Culber, the two most prominent gay characters in Trek before Jay-Den came along. Outside of their (frankly, very cute) scenes together as a couple, you might barely know they were gay because the show largely focused on their responsibilities: one was a doctor, one was an engineer. They were defined by their competence and characterization, and not by sexuality.
Jay-Den, outside of the one episode that focused on his character (the one that sent 99% of Klingons to Hell while giving him the “my parents didn’t understand me” stock gay story), wasn’t really developed as a character. Most of what we got from him was stupid romantic drama (“ooh, will he end up with the bad boy alpha or the adorkable beta?”) or more progressive signifiers (“look, he’s wearing the skirt again!”).
Such a portrayal arguably nullifies the whole point of representing minority groups because Jay-Den doesn’t get to be a real character; he gets to be a collection of stereotypes that make the audience feel good about how progressive they are.
To Explore New Worlds Of Strange
Despite being canceled, Starfleet Academy has a second season already filmed. At this point, one of my biggest hopes for Jay-Den is that he gets better character development in Season 2. But with Jay-Den actor Karim Diané’s recent Instagram declaration that “season 2 is gay AF” and that it will be “season 1 … turned all the way up,” I’m not exactly holding my breath.
Which is a shame because, once more for the cheap seats, there’s nothing wrong with having a gay Klingon. But the Starfleet Academy writers turned Jay-Den into a caricature rather than a character, one whose substance was buried under layers of cheap skirts and cheaper tropes.
He’s a non-threatening cipher that progressive fans can embrace to showcase their love for diversity. He’s touted as a brave new character, but Jay-Den actually reflects the cowardice of the writers. After all, if they were really ready to give us a gay Klingon, they wouldn’t have taken away everything that makes him a Klingon!
Entertainment
How An R-Rated Attempt To Make Reddit Relevant Became A Streaming Disaster
By TeeJay Small
| Published
Do you recall the 2021 GameStop stock trading story that took over the media and made a bunch of broke college kids thousand-aires overnight? It’s an incredible underdog story, about how the little guys can band together to take on financial behemoths, using the very tools that the billionaire elite employ to keep us down.
If you told that story with a stacked cast including Paul Dano, Seth Rogen, Nick Offerman, Sebastian Stan, Vincent D’Onofrio, and more, you might have a certifiable hit on your hands. Unfortunately, the film Dumb Money fails to deliver on any big laughs and reminds me of why movies about internet trends so often miss the mark.
The True Story Behind Dumb Money
In case you missed it, Dumb Money follows the true story of Keith Gill. Gill is a broke financial analyst living in Brockton, Massachusetts, who maintains a middling social media presence discussing low-value stocks with a small group of would-be day traders.
During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, Gill’s channels began to pick up major steam, especially as he bought up cheap shares of GameStop. As Gill reads into the financial reports, he arrives at the conclusion that the big firms are betting on Game Stop to fail, and shorting the stock with the intention of raking in billions from the business’s impending bankruptcy.
Thanks to an army of loyal Reddit users, Gill and his pals manage to fight back against Wall Street and raise the stock price of GameStop significantly. Doing so makes millions for people with pennies and takes billions from companies with hundreds of billions. If you’re not a complete sociopath, you should see it as a win-win for every party. Sure, the billionaires lose a fraction of a percent of their wealth, but they can dry their tears with lobsters on the decks of their massive yachts.
Reddit Forums Are Not Interesting
I wasn’t actively part of the GameStop stock push in 2021, but I did follow it as it took place. I was super excited to see Dumb Money when it released just a few years later, but I ultimately left the film extremely disappointed. As it turns out, it’s really hard to make a movie engaging or visually interesting when 90 percent of the action takes place on Reddit forums. The result is roughly 100 minutes of watching Paul Dano shout “holy shit” while sitting in a gamer chair, or watching America Ferrera make shocked expressions at her cell phone.
Dumb Money is also loaded with random, unnecessary, and downright obnoxious needle drops. The narrative hardly progresses for five minutes at a time without some licensed pop song stopping the action so we can watch people dance around pointlessly. Look, I’m not a monster, I enjoy Kendrick Lamar‘s “Humble” as much as anyone. But if I wanted to watch 6 music videos back-to-back, I’d be on YouTube, not Hulu. My estimate is that the team behind Dumb Money realized they didn’t have enough story to make a feature film and relied on these musical portions to pad the runtime.
Has Craig Gillespie Ever Met Another Human Being?
To further that point, it seems like director Craig Gillespie really struggled to juggle the moving parts behind this story. Sure, Keith Gill is the centerpiece of the narrative, but all the side characters feel more like cameo appearances than supporting performances. Nick Offerman’s character is meant to loom over the movie like a video game final boss, but he gets only about 5 minutes of screen time. Seth Rogen was all over the trailer for Dumb Money, but in the narrative, he has practically nothing to do. The two college girls created for the film are portrayed so obnoxiously that it makes me wonder if Craig Gillespie has ever met another human being in his entire life.
Personally, I’d skip this movie, but if you’re interested in checking it out for yourself, Dumb Money is streaming on Hulu. My best advice would be to throw it on while you’re cooking, cleaning, or looking at your phone. That way, you can soak up the interesting parts without committing to an hour and 44 minutes of Pete Davidson lip-syncing.
Entertainment
Why Buffy The Vampire Slayer's Most Important Character Is Also The Most Annoying
By Chris Snellgrove
| Published
Buffy the Vampire Slayer is a show filled with amazing characters, and fans love to debate which one is the best. Many prefer Buffy, the natural leader who uses her abilities as a Slayer to put vamps and other supernatural baddies in their place. Others prefer Willow, the geeky girl next door who eventually embraces her own magical mojo. Other fan-favorites include Spike (the bad boy with slick hair and a slicker accent), Anya (the former demon who loves nothing more than sex and money), and Faith (the sexy Slayer who goes from being Buffy’s frenemy to being her worst nightmare).
Few fans name Cordelia, and for good reason: while she grew as a character once she joined the Angel spinoff, she spends the vast majority of Buffy as a mean girl who does nothing more than disparage the other characters we know and love. After a while, it’s easy to start asking yourself a very blunt question: “why is Cordelia even in this show?” However, the answer is deceptively simple. She’s here as a constant reminder of how much Buffy (who was basically Cordelia before becoming a Slayer) has grown as a character.
The Softer Side Of Sneers
In those first three seasons of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Cordelia is seemingly the opposite of Buffy in every way. Buffy is defined by her duty to protect others, and she often misses out on the best parts of her high school days because she is busy fighting vampires. Cordelia, meanwhile, is a spoiled little rich girl who constantly berates Buffy for being so different than pretty much everyone else in Sunnydale High School.
While she gets some fun, sarcastic lines here and there, Cordelia can often feel like a superfluous character. However, she serves a more basic function in Buffy the Vampire Slayer by being an ongoing foil for Buffy. Like all good foils, Cordelia is everything that Buffy isn’t: she’s weak instead of strong, cruel instead of kind, and cowardly instead of brave. Nonetheless, Buffy is sometimes envious of Cordelia, like when she wishes she could be more like the resident mean girl because she thinks that’s the kind of woman Angel liked when he was still a mortal.
The Yin To Buffy’s Yang
Of course, Cordelia is a foil with a very specific purpose: she’s here to highlight how much Buffy has grown as a character since becoming the Slayer. Before Buffy moved to Sunnydale and fully embraced her destiny of fighting vampires, she was a vapid valley girl in Los Angeles. She just wanted to buy cute clothes and enjoy being popular, and she was so good at this that she was eventually elected Fiesta Queen. All of this is supremely shallow, of course. But to Buffy, this was the normal life she had to sacrifice in order to become the Slayer.
The constant presence of Cordelia highlights the significance of Buffy’s sacrifice. Until her family went broke and she had to move to Los Angeles, Cordelia enjoyed all the privileges of being Sunnydale’s most popular girl. All the women want to be her, and all the men want to be with her. She gets what she wants wherever she goes, and she generally gets to rule the school with the indifference of an imperious queen.
She’s A Killer Queen
In short, she has the life that Buffy desperately wants to have. When we see Cordelia sneeringly enjoying the fruits of her popularity, it’s easier to appreciate how Buffy sets her own needs aside for the sake of others. After a while, Buffy grows into her new life, and aside from occasional relapses (like her desperate bid to get elected homecoming queen), she never seriously tries to become a vapid Valley girl again. When we look at Cordelia, we see everything that Buffy is not, which only helps us to appreciate the Slayer’s growth that much more.
Buffy fans might hate Cordelia for being endlessly cruel to their favorite characters. But she is a constant reminder that Buffy, had she never become the Slayer, would be just as bad, if not worse. Greatness was thrust upon Buffy, and she rose to the occasion so well that she ended up saving the entire world, time and time again. Without Cordelia, the fandom might (like so many Sunnydale residents) very well take Buffy’s sacrifices for granted. Thanks to Cordelia, though, we got to spend three years appreciating how Buffy left her childhood behind to save everyone’s life but her own.
If you still really hate Cordelia, though, you should start rewatching Angel. By the end of that show, you’ll realize that nobody hated Sunnydale’s snarkiest Scooby more than Joss Whedon, who proved himself the meanest girl of them all by ruining her character (and, allegedly, Cordelia actor Charisma Carpenter), one insane plot point at a time.
Starfleet Academy’s Most Progressive Character Is Secretly Star Trek's Most Offensive
In Japan, the robot isn’t coming for your job; it’s filling the one nobody wants
