Entertainment
The Nutribullet Chill is the ice cream maker thats staying on my counter this summer
Table of Contents
I’m pretty loyal to my Nutribullet blender, which is now over a decade old and survived my college years and multiple apartment moves. I wasn’t surprised to see the brand expand its horizons into ice cream maker territory. Instant ice cream makers, like the Ninja Creami, which differ from traditional ice cream makers that focus on churning, are all the rage, making homemade ice cream a breeze. No more cooking custards on the stovetop or worrying about hours of churning.
But can a blender brand break into ice cream territory? These instant ice cream makers aren’t so different from blenders, using blades to break up frozen confections to create deliciously creamy homemade treats. But how does Nutribullet’s Chill ice cream maker fare in a crowded market already dominated by the Ninja Creami? Exceptionally well, if I do say so.
Nutribullet Chill at a glance:
The components of the Nutribullet Chill include the 16-ounce pint, blade block, and motor base.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable
Nutribullet, the brand behind beloved blenders, has debuted the Chill ice cream maker. It’s a simple but powerful ice cream maker with five presets that produces creamy, smooth frozen desserts in just minutes. For those looking for mix-ins, the machine doesn’t have a preset for it, and be prepared for noise, as it’s extremely loud.
It’s not too big for small spaces and is thoughtfully designed
The blade block attaches to pint containers and then slides into the Nutribullet Chill ice cream maker.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable
As a product reviewer with access to a whole world of kitchen gadgets, I have to be picky about what stays in my kitchen because there’s only so much counter and cabinet space. While I love the Ninja Creami Scoop and Swirl, it stays in storage most of the time because I just don’t have the space for it. But the Nutribullet Chill ice cream maker might just be the device that earns some kitchen real estate.
The whole device comes in three parts: the ice cream maker base, the blade block, and the blade cover. The base is smaller than a kitchen stand mixer, taking up very little square footage as it’s taller than it is wide. It’s decently hefty at 10.5 pounds, but it is fairly easy to maneuver on the kitchen counter. When not in use, I can easily tuck it away on the counter without losing too much space.
The Nutribullet Chill takes up less space on my counter than my stand mixer.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable
The blade is sort of a plunger shape and screws onto the top of the pint containers. The blade attachment and pint container are then placed on the base, upside down, as the blade rises and spins through the ice cream.
It’s a fascinating design choice compared to other instant ice cream makers I’ve tried, like the Ninja Creami or Cuisinart FastFreeze, which has a blade spinning down from the top. However, its unique design definitely works.
Perfectly creamy texture on the first try
The ice cream maker’s efficacy ultimately comes down to how well it spins the ice cream, and the Nutribullet Chill does an exceptional job. I made four different mixes on this machine: a classic vanilla ice cream, a dairy-free protein ice cream, a chocolate hazelnut frozen yogurt, and a strawberry frozen yogurt with fresh fruit.
The vanilla ice cream appeared a little melted while the dairy-free chocolate had a Wendy’s Frosty-like texture.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable
In most of Nutribullet’s recipes, they recommend blending your concoctions before freezing — not entirely surprising from a blender company.
Across the board, the machine processed all of the flavors I made well. The textures were smooth and creamy, but to varying degrees of success. The vanilla ice cream was the least successful as it was surprisingly melted and loose in texture; however, I don’t discredit the machine, it may have been a matter of the recipe, as other recipes fared much better.
The Nutribullet Chill makes exceptional frozen yogurt.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable
The dairy-free protein ice cream had a lovely, fluffy texture, almost like a Wendy’s Frosty. The frozen yogurts were the highlights, though, developing a texture between a hard and soft serve. As a frozen yogurt aficionado, I was extremely pleased with the results, excited about my next batch.
None of the mixtures needed a respin, and it was ready after just one spin cycle, which is better than most ice cream makers I’ve tested. But it’s also for the best since it doesn’t have a respin option.
Five pre-built settings — but no option for mix-ins or re-spins
The Nutribullet Chill comes with five pre-programmed settings: ice cream, sorbet, gelato, smoothie bowls, and frozen yogurt.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable
Preloaded with five settings, the Nutribullet Chill comes ready to make ice cream, sorbet, gelato, smoothie bowls, and frozen yogurt. The different settings worked well for their designated types, but I did feel a few were noticeably missing.
I expect a respin sitting on preprogrammed devices in case it doesn’t come out the right texture. However, Nutribullet may not need it, since all the recipes turned out well. But the most egregiously missing setting was a mix-in setting, which most ice cream mixes I’ve tested recommend.
Checking in with what the brand recommends, Nutribullet says to add in your mix-ins before freezing, which get blended and incorporated in when it processes. I took that route with the strawberry frozen yogurt, which had fresh fruit mixed in that got fully blended. If you want chunks mixed into your ice cream, then you’ll have to fold those in after.
It sounds like a truck and gets…hot?
One thing that I’ve come to expect with instant ice cream makers is the machines’ volume — they’re extremely loud. The Nutribullet Chill is the loudest ice cream maker I’ve tested, and while I can’t measure its specific decibels, I can say that it shocked me, sounding like a garbage truck was in my house, and making me wonder if I should be wearing earplugs while using it. Apartment dwellers, be warned — I’m lucky to have some very understanding neighbors.
Be warned, the shaft of the blade comes out hot to the touch after use.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable
What was most shocking was that for an ice cream maker, it gets pretty hot. The blade block has a metal shaft that slides into the machine, and after use, the shaft gets very hot. The ice cream maker has multiple “shaft hot” warnings (I know, I know), but it still surprised me how warm it was, and I wondered how that heat might affect the texture of the frozen treats, especially since the vanilla ice cream turned out so melted.
A total breeze to clean
Maybe I’m still salty about having to clean the Cuisinart FastFreeze, but cleaning the Nutribullet Chill components is a breeze. Luckily, nothing on the motor base needs cleaning, but the blade block, blade cover, and pint containers are all top-rack dishwasher safe. This was a pleasant surprise, considering most ice cream maker parts are not dishwasher-safe.
But if you don’t have a dishwasher, don’t fear. I hand-washed all the parts and found them very easy to clean.
Is the Nutribullet Chill worth it?
The Nutribullet Chill ice cream maker is a worth competitor to the Ninja Creami.
Credit: Samantha Mangino / Mashable
The Nutribullet Chill ice cream maker is a worthy rival of the Ninja Creami. It whips up perfectly creamy, smooth ice cream with no icy or watery texture. Be prepared for noise, as it’s the loudest ice cream maker I’ve tested, but it’s a nice option for people in smaller spaces, too.
If you just want the basics, making ice cream, sorbets, and frozen yogurt, then the Nutribullet Chill is a great machine and $30 cheaper than the Ninja Creami. But if you’re looking for mix-ins or a milkshake option, the Creami may be more your speed.
$149.62
at Amazon
$199.99
Save $50.37
Entertainment
How to watch Spain vs. Argentina online for free
TL;DR: Live stream Spain vs. Argentina in the 2026 FIFA World Cup final for free on BBC iPlayer or ITVX. Access these free streaming platforms from anywhere in the world with ExpressVPN, an Official Supporter of the FIFA World Cup 2026.
The 2026 FIFA World Cup has delivered weeks of electric entertainment. We’ve had controversy, moments of ecstasy, and incredibly displays of talent from the best players in the world. And now we’re down to the final, where Spain and Argentina will battle it out for the trophy.
Argentina are defending champions, but have stuttered through the tournament, relying on late goals. Spain also struggled to hit their best form in the group stage, but they’ve built momentum through the knockout rounds, culminating in an impressive victory over favorites France in the semi-final stage.
We’re expecting a fiery battle between two teams laden with stars.
If you want to watch Spain vs. Argentina in the 2026 FIFA World Cup final from anywhere in the world, we have all the information you need.
When is Spain vs. Argentina?
Spain vs. Argentina in the 2026 FIFA World Cup final kicks off at 3 p.m. ET on July 19. This fixture takes place at the New York New Jersey Stadium.
Mashable Top Stories
How to watch Spain vs. Argentina for free
Spain vs. Argentina in the 2026 FIFA World Cup final is available to live stream for free on BBC iPlayer or ITVX.
BBC iPlayer and ITVX are geo-restricted to the UK, but anyone can access these free streaming platforms with a VPN. These tools can hide your real IP address (digital location) and connect you to a secure server in the UK, meaning you can unblock BBC iPlayer and ITVX to live stream the 2026 World Cup final for free from anywhere in the world.
Live stream Spain vs. Argentina for free by following these simple steps:
-
Subscribe to a streaming-friendly VPN (we recommend ExpressVPN)
-
Download the app to your device of choice (the best VPNs have apps for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Linux, and more)
-
Open up the app and connect to a server in the UK
-
Visit BBC iPlayer or ITVX
-
Watch Spain vs. Argentina for free from anywhere in the world
$12.99 only at ExpressVPN
The best VPNs for streaming are not free, but most do offer free-trials or money-back guarantees. By leveraging these offers, you can access free live streams of the 2026 World Cup final without actually spending anything. This obviously isn’t a long-term solution, but it does give you enough time to stream Spain vs. Argentina before recovering your investment.
ExpressVPN’s regular 30-day money-back guarantee is not available for any subscriptions purchased during the Summer Tech Sweepstakes promotional period (July 11 to Aug. 11), but you do have a chance of winning an iPhone 17 Pro. ExpressVPN remains our top pick for sport, but you will need to pay the monthly rate. Alternatively, Proton VPN still offers that all-important money-back guarantee.
What is the best VPN for the World Cup final?
ExpressVPN is the best choice for bypassing geo-restrictions to stream live sport on BBC iPlayer or ITVX, for a number of reasons:
-
Servers in 105 countries including the UK
-
Easy-to-use app available on all major devices including iPhone, Android, Windows, Mac, and more
-
Strict no-logging policy so your data is secure
-
Fast connection speeds free from throttling
-
Up to 10 simultaneous connections
A two-year subscription to ExpressVPN is on sale for $68.40 and includes an extra four months for free — 81% off for a limited time. Alternatively, you can get a one-month plan for just $12.99. That covers you for the duration of the World Cup.
Live stream Spain vs. Argentina in the 2026 FIFA World Cup final for free.
Entertainment
Moon phase today: What the Moon will look like on July 19
Wondering what you’re looking at on the Moon’s surface? Wonder no more, with the help of NASA’s Daily Moon Guide, we’ve broken down all the features you might be looking at when you look up tonight.
What is today’s Moon phase?
As of Sunday, July 19, NASA’s Daily Moon Guide tracker tells us the Moon phase is in Waxing Crescent phase, with 29% of its surface visible.
You won’t need any visual aids to be able to spot the Mares Crisium and Fecunditatis. However, if you do have binoculars or a telescope, you’ll also be able to see the Endymion Crater.
When is the next Full Moon?
The next Full Moon will take place on July 29.
What are Moon phases?
The Moon completes one full cycle around Earth in about 29.5 days, moving through eight different phases along the way, NASA explains. Although the same side of the Moon always faces our planet, the amount of sunlight reflecting off its surface changes as it travels around Earth. This changing angle of illumination is what makes the Moon appear to transform throughout the month, from a thin crescent to a half-lit Moon and eventually a fully illuminated Full Moon, before starting the cycle again.
New Moon – The Moon is between Earth and the sun, so the side we see is dark (in other words, it’s invisible to the eye).
Mashable Light Speed
Waxing Crescent – A small sliver of light appears on the right side (Northern Hemisphere).
First Quarter – Half of the Moon is lit on the right side. It looks like a half-Moon.
Waxing Gibbous – More than half is lit up, but it’s not quite full yet.
Full Moon – The whole face of the Moon is illuminated and fully visible.
Waning Gibbous – The Moon starts losing light on the right side. (Northern Hemisphere)
Third Quarter (or Last Quarter) – Another half-Moon, but now the left side is lit.
Waning Crescent – A thin sliver of light remains on the left side before going dark again.
Entertainment
The Odyssey cyclops was inspired by one of historys goriest paintings
Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey draws from the literature of antiquity, but there’s an art history reference in the film that’s relatively more recent. And deeply gory.
In a major moment from Homer’s epic poem, Odysseus (Matt Damon) is heading home from the Trojan War with his men when they stop by an island for food and supplies. It’s here they find themselves trapped in the sheep-filled cave of the mighty Polyphemus (Bill Irwin), a towering cyclops who casually changes up his daily diet of homemade artisanal cheese for a bloody feast of weary Ionian soldiers.
The Odyssey‘s production design of Polyphemus is terrifying and weird: a colossal, awkward, human-like form with twisted facial features including a solitary, rotated eye. Snatching up Odysseus’ crewmates like popcorn, the cyclops stands for a moment crunching on a newly headless man, his bleeding body limp in the creature’s hand.
It’s this moment that art history nerds (hi) might connect with a familiarly gory scene, of a wild god feasting upon a torso: Francisco Goya’s early 1820s masterpiece, Saturn Devouring His Son.
Francisco Goya’s “Saturn Devouring His Son.”
Credit: Fine Art Images / Heritage Images/ Getty Images
Nolan has confirmed the cyclops was inspired by the 19th-century Spanish artist’s famous work, which depicts a violent moment from ancient Greek myth. As detailed in Barry B. Powell’s Classical Myth, Zeus’ dad Cronus (called Saturn by the Romans), was the leader of the Titans, powerful beings who sired the Olympian gods. Cronus’ mum Gaia (Terra) and dad Ouranos (Uranus) had a prophecy that he would be overthrown by one of his divine children — Poseidon, Demeter, Hestia, Hera, or Hades. So, what did Cronus do? He ate them.
Mashable Top Stories
In fact, Cronus threw back his kids whole, which is important later in the story (Zeus, who was born in secret, managed to get his dad to vomit up his siblings and they indeed rose up against the Titans). But in Goya’s painting, Saturn/Cronus has not eaten his brood whole. With those wild eyes open, he’s ripped the head and arms off one of his children and is snacking away on the torso like a baby with a teething rusk. It’s pure madness.
And this is exactly how Nolan has Polyphemus feast on the Greek soldiers in The Odyssey. Like a child. A wild child of gods. Which, incidentally, is what Polyphemus is — the son of sea god Poseidon and oceanid or sea nymph Thoosa.
It’s no wonder Nolan had Goya’s gruesome visual on his mood board. Back to the original ancient text, Homer’s description of the cyclops’ feast (translated by Emily Wilson) is just as grisly, as he writes, “Leaping up high, he reached his hands towards my men, seized two, and knocked them hard against the ground like puppies, and the floor was wet with brains. He ripped them limb by limb to make his meal, then ate them like a lion on the mountains, devouring flesh, entrails, and marrow bones, and leaving nothing.”
Flemish artist Peter Paul Rubens also did a horrifically figurative version of Saturn Devouring His Son earlier in the 17th century, a moment of infanticide and child cannibalism which can’t really be unseen.
So, when you’re watching The Odyssey, think of Goya’s bloodthirsty, paranoid Saturn and one of the most gory snackscapades in art history.
McIlroy 'not fond' of DeChambeau, held The Open 'hostage' over controversy
Spain cancels final World Cup tuneup; Argentina practices after weather delay
