Entertainment
Sexy, R-Rated 80s Action Thriller Is An Unfairly Overlooked Revenge And Rescue
By Robert Scucci
| Published

There’s nothing I love more than a generic plot that lets you lean into and have fun with its characterization. I’m not even being facetious here. I think it’s a model that works for commercial filmmaking because, if we’re being real, we’re all just watching the same movies over and over again with different titles. There are expected genre conventions that allow filmmakers to bust out a quick storyboard, get some great talent involved, and let them chew the hell out of the scenery.
1989’s L.A. Bounty is just another “lone bounty hunter looking for revenge” flick, but it works because Sybil Danning is serious as a heart attack in the lead role, and then she has to face off with Wings Hauser, who seems to be having just a little too much fun acting like a murderous psychopath.

You know all the beats going into this one, but you’ll want to stick around because the exchanges that happen between those beats make the entire viewing experience worthwhile. And at the end of the day, aren’t we all just trying to be entertained?
Mayors, Mobsters, And Murder

L.A. Bounty kicks off with the kidnapping of Mike Rhodes (Robert Hanley), who’s running for mayor in the next election. A lone bounty hunter, Ruger (Sybil Danning), intervenes, allowing Mike’s wife, Kelly (Lenore Kasdorf), to escape traumatized but safe. We learn that Mike was kidnapped by psychotic drug kingpin Cavanaugh (Wings Hauser), who spends most of his time painting portraits of nude women and killing people on a whim when he’s not moving unthinkable amounts of drugs to his cohorts.
When Cavanaugh learns that Kelly is still a loose end, he sends his men to ambush her, but Ruger is already one step ahead of him, and she’s pissed. This isn’t Ruger’s first run-in with Cavanaugh, but she’s hoping it will be her last. Previously, Ruger worked as a narcotics officer trying to take down the kingpin, but she resigned from the force after he killed her partner in cold blood, giving her current protection job more personal stakes than Kelly would like to be involved with.

Meanwhile, Lieutenant Chandler (Henry Darrow) works closely with Mayor Burrows (J. Christopher Sullivan), who wants to know who’s behind the kidnapping. Being this close to the election, the only thing he cares about is saving face, and he doesn’t want the public, or any of his constituents for that matter, to think he had anything to do with his rival’s kidnapping.
Sybil Is Serviceable, Hauser Is Next Level
While L.A. Bounty didn’t boost Sybil Danning’s career like she thought it would, she’s doing everything she’s supposed to be doing here. Ruger is a woman of few words, but she knows how to hold her own in action scenes. She convincingly portrays a jaded bounty hunter with an axe to grind, while still bringing plenty of B-movie energy to the forefront. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but she was clearly hoping this flick would be her ticket to action-thriller franchise stardom, which is quite the reach if I’m being brutally honest. The film’s $2.2 million budget leaves it rough around the edges, and she performs well within those limitations, so credit where it’s due.

The real star of the show in L.A. Bounty is Wings Hauser as Cavanaugh. He’s so delightfully twisted that it borders on comical, but the contrast between his personality and Danning’s makes for some genuinely entertaining moments. Cavanaugh thinks he’s some brilliant artist, but we don’t see what he’s painting until well into the third act, which makes you want to rewind the whole thing and revisit every scene set in his lair. Early on, when he’s philosophizing and talking about his evil plans, you build up an image in your head of beautiful photorealistic portraiture or some insanely detailed abstract art. What you finally get to see recontextualizes everything that came before because he’s laughably terrible at art.
The final action sequences have their limitations, but there are a few great kills that make the juice worth the squeeze. One thing I admired, which I’ve been thinking a lot about lately, is how we need to bring back the warehouse showdown. Sometimes all you need to make a low-budget action movie really pop off is a few practical explosions, a floor littered with shell casings, and a badass bounty hunter rocking the Atomic Blonde haircut decades before Charlize Theron ever did.


As of this writing, you can stream L.A. Bounty for free on Tubi.
Entertainment
Stargate SG-1 Started A Series-Long Tradition And A Fan Favorite Running Joke
By Jonathan Klotz
| Updated

One thing you’ll notice when you’re (re)watching Stargate SG-1, is that Daniel Jackson (Michael Shanks) dies a lot. By the time he dies in Episode 12, “Fire and Water,” his death count is up to three (the movie, and “Nox”), which is a little high for a regular human. Then again, he doesn’t really die in “Fire and Water,” so should that even count? Stargate Command gives him a full funeral with military honors so to my mind, it counts as another notch for “Daniel Jackson is Dead.”
Daniel Jackson Is Dead. Again. For The Third Time.

“Fire and Water” opens with SG-1 coming back earlier than expected from their latest mission, looking all sad and dejected as Hammond asks what went wrong, and learns that “Jackson is dead.” Before the opening credits we see the whole military funeral, O’Neill (Richard Dean Anderson) giving a touching eulogy where he admits that Jackson is the heart of the team. Out of anger, O’Neill, likely a little drunk off of Molson’s, takes out the window of a car with a hockey stick (look quick and you’ll note it says “Anderson” on the stick) and angrily demands they movie it. It’s Hammond’s car, prompting a suddenly much calmer O’Neill to tell his boss that he needs to replace that window.
The SG-1 team slowly realizes that Daniel isn’t dead. Something messed with their minds to make them think he was. Turns out, Daniel’s alive, underwater in the lair of the aquatic merman Nem to help solve the thousand-year old mystery of what happened to his mate, Omoroca. We learn that Omoroca and Nem helped teach the ancient Babylonians until she was murdered by Belus, who of course, was a Goa’uld System Lord. It all goes back to the Goa’uld.
The Math Ain’t Mathing

The merman like Nem is played by Gerard Plunkett, who first appeared on Stargate SG-1 as Councilor Tuplo in “The Broca Divide,” starting the trend of actors playing multiple aliens during the show’s decade-long run. Nem never reappears, nor is he or Omoroca mentioned again, perhaps because someone behind the scenes did the math and realized the pair’s involvement with the ancient Babylonians and also the Goa’uld broke the timeline.
Jackson tells Nem that Omoroca helped inspire the Tau’ri rebellion against the Goa’uld. That took place in 3000 B.C.E. in Egypt, yet Jackson says Nem was on Earth 4,000 years ago working with the Babylonians. That maths out to roughly 2000 B.C.E., or a thousand years after the rebellion. Goa’uld being active on Earth and acting as Gods past that point doesn’t work with the timing of the burial of the Stargate.
“Fire and Water” is another in the long line of episodes that introduces an advanced species with deep ties to the roots of human civilization that we never see again. Get used to it, even Stargate Atlantis does this years later. It’s also not the last time that Jackson is killed in the line of duty. On its own, it’s a bit of an empty episode that alludes to bigger things, though it does get a little credit for Nem’s planet Oannes not looking like the woods of Vancouver for once.
Entertainment
EA reverses course, removes microtransactions from College Football 27
EA Sports announced it will remove all paid progression options from College Football 27‘s Dynasty and Road to Glory modes, reversing a decision that drew significant backlash from fans and content creators following the game’s launch.
In a statement posted to social media during the game’s launch week, the developer acknowledged that player feedback indicated the microtransactions “missed the mark.”
The studio said the paid options had been “added independent of deeper mode progression with the aim to give players more choice,” but conceded that “what you’ve said is that they’re not adding the value we intended.” EA said the changes would take effect the following morning, though it warned that players with existing College Point balances would lose the ability to apply them to Road to Glory or Dynasty once the features were removed, urging fans to spend their points beforehand.
Mashable Top Stories
Our big Guessing Game is back! Enter now for a chance to win an Apple Watch.
The reversal follows a wave of criticism after College Football 27‘s release, with fans organizing around the hashtag #CFBPlayDontPay to voice frustration over microtransactions appearing in the game’s single-player offline modes. The system allowed players to spend real money to instantly boost their coach or player’s development. For example, maxing out a coach in Dynasty from the start could cost as much as $100, more than the price of the game itself.
Compounding the frustration, EA also removed sliders that let players in College Football 25 and 26 manually adjust how much experience they earned, a feature that had let people level up faster without paying. With that option gone, spending money became the only way to speed up progression, which is what drove much of the backlash.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Notably, the statement stopped short of ruling out microtransactions from the franchise going forward. EA said its “goal for live service plans in CFB28 and beyond will be to deliver valuable features and content with greater transparency and communication” — language suggesting paid content will return in some form in next year’s edition, even as the company walks back the current game’s implementation.
Topics
Social Good
Video Games
Entertainment
Underappreciated R-Rated 90s Sci-Fi With Stacked Cast Is Genius With Its Worldbuilding
By Robert Scucci
| Updated

When was the last time you watched 1993’s Demolition Man? It’s one of those movies that feels like a sci-fi classic because it is. Whenever I talk about it with people who haven’t seen it in a while, or even revisited it as an adult, I always get the same answer, something along the lines of, “That movie is so dumb.” It’s the same treatment Starship Troopers gets when people only experience it at face value. In actuality, it’s a perfect satire about future life that reminds me more of Idiocracy than anything else, just in a more sophisticated, less overtly slapstick kind of way.
That is all to say, if it’s been a minute since you’ve watched Demolition Man and you’re of the mind that it’s not a very smart movie, you might want to give it another shot. If you picked up on the satire the first time around, I’d still suggest another watch because it’s such a fun movie.

But if you’re asking, and I’m being real here, I still don’t know what the three seashells are used for in the bathroom.
Swearing Is Illegal, But Taco Bell Is A Black Tie Experience
I’m not going to spend too much time talking about the plot to Demolition Man because it’s pretty barebones. What really sells the movie is the world it inhabits, and how the worldbuilding is drip-fed to us instead of ever being explicitly explained. It’s the same thing Officer John Spartan (Sylvester Stallone) experiences when he wakes up in the year 2032 and suffers the worst kind of culture shock.

John’s problems started in 1996 while facing off against the most charismatic psychopath ever committed to film in the form of Wesley Snipes‘ Simon Phoenix. When a hostage situation goes horribly wrong, resulting in piles of dead hostages thanks to John’s miscalculation, both John and Simon are convicted and sentenced to lengthy terms at the California Cryo-Penitentiary.
During a parole hearing in 2032, a thawed Simon escapes and embarks on a crime spree that’s inadvertently facilitated by the “subliminal rehabilitation techniques” used during his incarceration, allowing him to adapt to his new surroundings with an alarming amount of precision. Given John Spartan’s history with Simon Phoenix, Officer Zachary Lamb (Bill Cobbs) advises Lieutenant Lenina Huxley (Sandra Bullock) that the best course of action is to thaw John out and let him loose after his arch nemesis.

Woozy from cryosleep and in a complete state of shock over how different life is in 2032, John has his work cut out for him. He’s familiar with Simon’s modus operandi, but everything else is foreign. Why is he now living in the city of San Angeles? Why is eating at Taco Bell a formal affair? And WHAT THE HELL ARE THE THREE SEASHELLS FOR?!
Somebody, please, answer me.
World Building Through Serious Scene Chewing

One thing that Demolition Man doesn’t get enough credit for is its unwillingness to explicitly lay out how society works in 2032. The advantage this offers is twofold. We’re just as confused as John Spartan when he receives written citations for swearing and engaging in other carnal pleasures now deemed immoral. John is a smart guy who relies on instinct when he’s in his element, but the world he came from no longer matches the one he now lives in. Most of the humor comes from him asking questions that anybody in 2032 would take for granted, resulting in bemused stares and stifled laughter despite the fact he’s serious as a heart attack.
On the other side of the coin is Wesley Snipes, whose scene-chewing charisma steals every single scene. He’s mentally enhanced thanks to the “rehabilitation” program, and basically all that means is that he’s one step ahead of everybody because he possesses talents he never had before. The dude is running around hacking computers, stealing weapons, and cackling every step of the way. Snipes in Demolition Man has the same energy he brings to White Men Can’t Jump (1992), but instead of conning Woody Harrelson as a means of survival, he’s dead set on unleashing absolute chaos and antagonizing the very officer who locked him up decades earlier.

Rounding out the cast is Sandra Bullock with her portrayal of Lenina Huxley. While Stallone and Snipes dish out cynicism in healthy doses, Bullock brings a child-like sense of naivety with her fascination for late 20th century culture, something she’s only learned about through history lessons. This naturally evolves into a romantic entanglement between Lenina and her new de facto partner, John, who’s from the very time and culture she’s obsessed with. It’s an odd-couple dynamic given how apprehensive they are toward each other at the beginning of the film, but it leaves them both with plenty of room to grow by the time the credits roll.
Demolition Man earns its keep as a satire because it shows instead of tells. The city of San Angeles in 2032 is as perplexing as it is amusing, and we’re learning about it alongside John when we’re dropped into this world. The logic is established early on, but the incidental things we take for granted, like going to the bathroom (again with the shells), are left open to interpretation. The film merely alludes to the franchise wars before dropping you into the ridiculousness of a formal Taco Bell dinner. Before long, you’re used to the profanity-policing drones, and you’re completely immersed in the world.

If you’re willing to give Demolition Man a second chance, overdue for a rewatch, or simply never saw it, you can stream it on Tubi for free as of this writing.

