Connect with us

Entertainment

Ryan Reynolds Killing His Biggest Franchise Is The Right Call

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

Ryan Reynolds franchise

In the highly successful Deadpool & Wolverine film, there’s a fun running gag where the Merc With the Mouth teases Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine character that he’ll be appearing in Disney’s Marvel movies until the actor playing him is 90. Given that enthusiasm for one-half of the title characters, many fans assumed we’d be getting many more movies featuring everyone’s favorite WHAM-loving hero.

However, Ryan Reynolds recently revealed that he doesn’t plan to make any more Deadpool movies. While most fans are sad about this declaration, the actor is making the best choice for himself and for Marvel.

Why Ryan Reynolds Is Quitting On Deadpool

Deadpool

What’s the context for this surprising declaration behind Disney’s newest golden boy? Ryan Reynolds was recently interviewed by fellow Sony Marvel alumnus Andrew Garfield, and they began talking about the prospect of making more Deadpool movies.

To everyone’s surprise, Reynolds cast doubt on the idea of doing a fourth Deadpool movie for several reasons, including that he wants to spend more time with his family and that Deadpool works well when there’s “scarcity and surprise.” That means he thinks there should be a long wait between movies (like the six-year wait between Deadpool 2 and Deadpool & Wolverine).

Interestingly, Ryan Reynolds seemed to cast some oblique shade on Disney when discussing his willingness to create more Deadpool movies. The comment about the character needing “scarcity and surprise,” for example, seems to be calling out how the House of Mouse likes to tie actors to decade-long contracts and crank out as much content as possible. He also claimed that he made Deadpool & Wolverine “to be a complete experience instead of a commercial for another one,” which seems to call out Disney’s tendency to make otherwise exciting shows and films feel like launching pads for the next big thing.

Gambit Channing Tatum
Channing Tatum as Gambit in Deadpool & Wolverine

While Ryan Reynolds didn’t completely rule out starring in another solo Deadpool movie, he offered some great insight in between thumbing his nose at Disney. He pointed out that his character is a “supporting character much more than he is a main” and that Deadpool works better as an “underdog” than as the hero. Because of that, he said he’d be more enthusiastic about being a supporting character in another hero’s film, citing how much he’d love to play “fifth banana” in a Gambit film starring Channing Tatum.

Respect Ryan Reynolds As An Artist, He’s Right About Everything

Deadpool

The more I heard Ryan Reynolds describe why he doesn’t necessarily want to do more Deadpool solo films, the more I found myself respecting him as an artist. He’s completely right about his character’s films feeling special because we have to wait long periods of time between each entry, and even Marvel’s biggest fans must admit that, given the chance, execs would crank out as many crappy Deadpool appearances as possible to try to sell toys and Disney+ subscriptions. 

For that matter, Reynolds could make like Robert Downey Jr. and keep coming back for bigger and bigger paychecks, but he’s making an admirable choice to basically miss out on easy money in order to preserve the integrity of his character. Obviously, the Deadpool actor isn’t hurting for money, but it’s an open secret in Hollywood that being an MCU actor is an easy way to score one high-paying gig after another. I can’t help but admire that the actor seems ready to pull back for artistic reasons right when he’s in a position to make Disney put forth maximum effort into writing him a series of oversized checks.

Deadpool in Deadpool & Wolverine

Finally, for all the love Ryan Reynolds clearly has for Deadpool, I’m glad that he could set his ego aside and realize that his character would be much better utilized as a sidekick than as the main star. The Merc With a Mouth is a bit like Hulk in this way: a character whose individual stories don’t always work (some of those Deadpool comics are rough, y’all) but whose extreme personality is fun for other characters to bounce off. That’s the real secret behind Deadpool & Wolverine’s success. It’s basically an X-Men movie where Deadpool gets to be a hilarious fish out of water.

Ryan Reynolds is right: we don’t need more Deadpool solo movies. We need him as a secret sauce sidekick that pops up in future MCU adventures. How great would it be for him to finally interact onscreen with Spider-Man or for him to steal scenes in Avengers: Doomsday? The fact that the actor behind the iconic character agrees he should be a vulgar supporting character rather than endlessly playing a leading man does something I no longer thought possible: gives me hope for the future of Marvel cinema. 


source

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Mortal Kombat II review: The bar is in hell for video game movies, huh?

How many times do we have to go through this?

Yes, Mortal Kombat has been a massively popular video game franchise since its spawning in 1992. Yes, its over-the-top kills and thrillingly scornful catchphrases make the fighting games incredibly fun. But despite several attempts including 1995’s Mortal Kombat, 1997’s Mortal Kombat: Annihilation, and the 2021 reboot, also titled Mortal Kombat, not a single good live-action movie has been made from this IP.

Yet here we are again with another ugly, nonsensical mess, this time called Mortal Kombat II.

Mortal Kombat, the last film in this much-flubbed franchise, centered on Cole Young (Lewis Tan), a descendant of Sub-Zero (Joe Taslim), who’s a fish out of water in the titular fighting tournament world. This time, he’s relegated to a tertiary character, so the sequel can pivot to a new fish out of water, Johnny Cage (Karl Urban), a washed-up ’90s action star who’d rather crush a beer than a spine. However, when a malevolent conqueror named Shao Kahn (Martyn Ford) threatens Earthrealm, it’s up to Cage and a coterie of super-powered fighters to win a Mortal Kombat tournament to save their world.

Wisely, Warner Bros. led with Cage in their early promos, releasing teasers that showed a cheeky self-awareness of the Western martial arts movie while suggesting Mortal Kombat II would be funnier than its predecessor. Frustratingly, this is another example of good trailer, bad movie. And a big part of why is that Cage feels like he’s been wedged in, rather than centered on, for a new perspective.

Mortal Kombat II is a befuddling eyesore with sub-zero emotional depth.

Adeline Rudolph as "Kitana" in New Line Cinema's "Mortal Kombat II", a Warner Bros. Pictures Release.

Adeline Rudolph as Kitana.
Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

Mortal Kombat (2021) director Simon McQuoid is back with muddy CGI settings, rubbery CGI fighters, and much of his movie’s cast reprising their roles. Along with Tan and Taslim, Jessica McNamee is back as Sonya Blade, Josh Lawson as Kano, Mehcad Brooks as Jax, Ludi Lin as Liu Kang, Tadanobu Asano as Raiden, and Hiroyuki Sanada as Hanzo Hasashi / Scorpion.

Joining the fighter line-up opposite Cage are fan-wielding Kitana (Adeline Rudolph), staff-armed Jade (Tati Gabrielle), the many-fanged Baraka (CJ Bloomfield), and Ford as brutish conqueror Shao Kahn.

Now, you might think that’s too many characters to create meaningful story arcs over the course of a 116-minute runtime. And you’d be right!

Sure, screenwriter Jeremy Slater could have narrowed the focus to Cage’s experience to better create a moving narrative, while still folding in the requisite fighting, brawlers, and game allusions. But hey, why not split the story focus between Cage, whose gruff has-been attitude pitches Mortal Kombat II toward a promising Galaxy Quest vibe, and Kitana, whose rebellious warrior princess thread is reminiscent of Guardians of the Galaxy‘s Gamora as she battled Thanos and her “sister” Nebula. But here, Thanos is Shao Kahn, who murders Kitana’s dad in the film’s glacially paced opening sequence. And Nebula is Jade, Kitana’s bestie/guard since she became Shao Kahn’s prisoner as a girl. (If you want more backstory, fret not, there’s plenty.)

Tati Gabrielle as “Jade” in New Line Cinema’s “Mortal Kombat 2,” a Warner Bros. Pictures release.

Tati Gabrielle as Jade.
Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

Cage won’t even show up for the first 14 minutes of Mortal Kombat II. In that time, the sequel plunges into the same grim and self-serious atmosphere that made McQuoid’s first Mortal Kombat a bore. Sure, the fight scenes are really violent and bloody, befitting the film’s R-rating. But the fights feel disconnected from the storytelling. Worse yet, these battles are shot with very little visual logic, meaning some big blows just don’t hit.

And yep, there sure are recreations of memorable characters, their costumes, weapons, and catchphrases. But the major important distinction between this rebooted movie franchise and the games is, the games were fun.

The most fun Mortal Kombat and Mortal Kombat II can offer is Kano, the only character who resolutely refuses to take things seriously.

Karl Urban shines, but Josh Lawson is Mortal Kombat II‘s MVP.

Karl Urban as “Johnny Cage”, Hiroyuki Sanada as “Scorpion”, and Josh Lawson as “Kano” in New Line Cinema’s “Mortal Kombat 2,” a Warner Bros. Pictures release.

Karl Urban as Johnny Cage, Hiroyuki Sanada as Scorpion, and Josh Lawson as Kano.
Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

As Cage, Urban brings with him an American arrogance that shakes up the seriousness of the Earthrealm battlers. He’s snarky where they’re stern, creating a feisty dynamic that borders on amusing. But as Cage’s clichéd plot line demands he become a selfless, brave hero, he becomes more grave and less giggle-inducing. Thank the gods for Lawson’s Kano.

This crusty criminal and unrepentant asshole died in the last movie, but like other MK fighters, he’s resurrected for this sequel. Thankfully, rather than being brought back as another humorless revenant, Kano is as chaotically insulting as ever, slinging barbs with reckless abandon. When he mocks necromancer Quan Chi (Damon Herriman) for his “eyeliner,” I howled with laughter. And for a brief moment I thought that between Cage and Kano, this movie might actually begin to get fun!

Alas, my hopes were squashed like a skull under a warhammer. Kano and Cage get to be comic relief, while Kitana broods and a new quest kicks off to heist a magical gem from Shao Kahn, which he effectively uses as an immortality cheat code. Again, life-or-death battles and a heist into the heart of a tyrant’s castle? This should be exciting and entertaining!

Inexplicably, McQuoid bleeds any tension from these sequences with a mangled visual language that makes fights hard to follow and the quest feel like an afterthought. Suspense cannot build because in every other scene, Slater’s script delivers another exposition drop to explain the tournament, the realms, the revenants — on and on! Video games are a visual medium. Movies are a visual medium. Yet much of this movie feels like I got locked into a tedious podcast.

In the end, Mortal Kombat II feels like the wretched compromise of two movie pitches. One is a sequel that closely follows the saga and dolesome tone of the last movie. The other is an action-comedy in the vein of Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves. Whether it’s Kano reading other fighters to filth, or a sequence where Cage is chased around a village by a rampaging Baraka, there are moments where Mortal Kombat II flirts with not taking this IP deadly seriously. But then McQuoid pivots back to a tone that’s less Shogun and more Iron Fist. And as sloppy and artless as this adaptation is, it probably won’t matter.

Gamers need to demand more of video game movies.

C.J. Bloomfield as “Baraka” in New Line Cinema’s “Mortal Kombat 2,” a Warner Bros. Pictures release.

CJ Bloomfield as Baraka.
Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

It’s long been a cliché that video game movies are traditionally bad. I was recently disappointed by the Until Dawn movie and moved to consider my own mortality over the vacuousness of The Super Mario Galaxy Movie. And yet, studios keep plugging along with these movies “for the fans.”

Don’t be fooled. That’s a cynical sales pitch that assumes gamers love the source IP so much that studios don’t need to bring skilled filmmakers or spend the money on top-notch fight choreography, stunts, or visual effects. They believe the fans will come regardless of what they actually put on screen. And maybe they’re right! After all, critics warned that The Super Mario Galaxy Movie was a soulless sequel with more allusions than entertainment. But it’s nearing a billion dollars for worldwide box office. So, why should studios change strategy?

Warner Bros hired a commercial director to make his feature directorial film debut with Mortal Kombat, and now he’s back with a muddled vision that’s an ugly and lifeless slog. But if fans go to the theater or stream this exhaustively on HBO Max, like they presumably did its predecessor, then the bar is in hell, and it won’t be raised.

At least we have more Last of Us to look forward to, right?

Mortal Kombat II opens in theaters on May 8.

source

Continue Reading

Entertainment

This robotic pool vacuum is basically a Roomba that can swim, and it’s $449 off today

SAVE 35%: As of May 6, you can get the Beatbot AquaSense 2 for $849 at Amazon, down from $1,298. That’s a 35% discount or $449 savings.


$849
at Amazon

$1,298
Save $449

 

I don’t have a pool (well, not a personal one, anyway; I live in an apartment complex), but I do have a robot vacuum, and I know the joy of watching a little machine clean my floors while I do other things. If you apply that same logic to pool maintenance (which I imagine is a lot more annoying than keeping your floors clean), then investing in a robo pool cleaner makes a lot of sense.

And, right now, you can get one of Amazon’s top-rated models for a fraction of the price. As of May 6, you can get the Beatbot AquaSense 2 for $849 at Amazon, down from $1,298. That’s a 35% discount or $449 savings. It’s also the lowest price we’ve seen this model go for. The only problem? Amazon marked this as a “limited-time deal,” and the countdown clock shows it ends in about 16 hours.

This thing works just like an indoor robot vacuum; it maps out its cleaning path and then uses an onboard 4-core CPU and 16 sensors to navigate using an S-path for the pool floor and an N-path to scrub the walls and waterline. It also has a “Double-Pass Scrubbing” feature for the waterline, so it’ll get the grimiest spots twice per pass. Bonus: When it’s done cleaning (or when the battery runs low), it automatically parks itself at the surface of the water so you don’t have to go diving to retrieve it.

source

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Grandma Anne’s Secret Jell-O

Grandma Anne's Secret Jell-O

I love making food that people appreciate — the kind of meal that makes the whole table go quiet at the first bite. But you know what I kind of love more? Making food that makes the whole table shriek like kids chasing the ice-cream truck.

So, when I happened upon a “secret Jell-O” recipe in chef Hillary Sterling’s new cookbook, Ammazza! — titled for the Roman slang term, which roughly translates to “wowee!” — I knew I had to share.

“This was the defining treat of my childhood,” explains Hillary. Growing up, her Grandma Anne always kept a bowl of Jell-O in the fridge. “She added halved grapes, and they’d hover in the middle while it ‘jellified.’ It tasted so cool, refreshing, and delicious.” As adults, Hillary and her sister tried to replicate it, but never managed to get the taste just right. That’s when their grandpa clued them in to Grandma Anne’s secret ingredient: sweet liqueur. “Turns out, our favorite childhood dessert was one part Grandma, one part frat party.”

Hillary’s own adaptation is a little more cocktail-party than frat, but just as festive: a ruby-red confection, studded with plums and served in a champagne coupe. Plus, it’s incredibly simple, with less than 10 minutes of active cooking time. And while I’ll give Grandma Anne the benefit of the doubt, and say she probably wasn’t trying to inebriate her grandchildren, this recipe has almost a shot’s worth of brandy per serving (wowee, indeed!). So, let’s maybe keep it at the grown-ups table.

Grandma Anne’s Secret Jell-O
from Ammazza! by Hillary Sterling
Serves 4

1/2 cup (115 g) prunes*
3/4 cup (180 ml) brandy
1 85-gram package cherry gelatin

*It’s true, prunes are dried plums. Here, they’re essentially rehydrated in the cooking process.

In a small pot, combine the prunes and 1/2 cup (120 ml) of the brandy. Bring to a boil, then turn the heat low, and cook until the prunes absorb all the liquid (about 5 minutes). Set aside. In a separate small saucepan, bring 1 cup (240 ml) of water to a boil. Place the gelatin in a heatproof bowl, then pour the hot water over it, whisking until fully dissolved (about 2 minutes). Stir in the remaining 1/4 cup (60 ml) of brandy and 1 cup (240 ml) of cold water.

Divide half of the gelatin mixture evenly among four glasses, filling them about halfway. (“This is the time to break out your heirloom wine glasses or champagne coupes,” says Hillary. “Style and presentation meant everything to my grandmother.”) Arrange the glasses on a small sheet pan for stability. Refrigerate, uncovered, until just set (about 1 hour).

Finally, divide the steeped prunes evenly among the glasses, gently placing them on top of the set layer. Top each glass with the remaining gelatin — the fruit will “float” as it sets. Cover and refrigerate until firm but still jiggly (about 1 hour more). Serve, and enjoy!

ammazza cookbook

Thank you so much, Hillary! And congratulations on your beautiful cookbook.

P.S. More fun party recipes, including a chaotic pavlova and a pasta cake.

(Photos by Kelly Puleio. Excerpted with permission from Ammazza!, on sale now from Scribner, an imprint of Simon & Schuster. Copyright © 2026 by Hillary Sterling)

source

Continue Reading