Sports
MLB Salary Cap Proposal: What a Cap and Floor Could Look Like
The proposed cap would be between $260 and $280 million, and the proposed floor would be between $140 and $160 million. Currently, five teams are above the upper quadrant of the proposed cap, and eleven teams are below the bottom quadrant of the floor. That’s probably the biggest issue to address when discussing a proposed cap.
It’s unfair to expect teams to overhaul their already constructed rosters in one year in order to be within the cap. Teams would need a transition period to reach the target. Maybe rules could be put in place that prevent teams from making more signings if they are a certain amount over the cap.
The MLB could institute its version of a second apron. In the NBA, if a team is above the second apron, they are penalized with strict tax penalties, cannot make trades that aggregate contracts, have their first-round pick moved to the end of the draft, and can only sign players to the veteran minimum.
Most of these penalties would not occur in the first year the cap is implemented, but they could immediately force teams above the cap to no longer be able to offer contracts to free agents outside the veteran minimum or minor league deals.
Another massive issue that would need to be solved is deferred contracts. The most obvious solution is limit the amount of time or the amount that can be deferred for each contract. Unfortunately, teams like the Dodgers have billions in deferred money on the books, so I’m not sure how you could fix that. Those contracts are ruining baseball, but they might just need to be grandfathered in.
Another key piece is teams well under the salary floor. The Cleveland’s and Miami’s of the world currently have rosters that are hardly half of the salary floor. I wonder if they will have to restructure most of the contracts on their team, or if they will have to make swings for contracts on teams over the cap, so both sides can be within the rules.
Another speed bump is that many players feel that a cap limits the potential earnings for the entire league. I fully disagree with that sentiment. The days of players getting $750M over ten years might be done, but the bottom half of the league will see very nice pay bumps as teams try to raise their salary floors.
Another issue comes with the percentage of the cap floor. In the NFL and NBA, the cap floor is 90% of the cap ceiling. Owners would never allow a number that high, but the players would probably like that, as it would almost force every team to have at least one “max contract”.
Implementing a cap will be a difficult process, and both sides will face issues with it, but to maintain competitive balance in the league, it’s necessary.
Sports
Big Ten March Madness Contenders Ranked by Analytics
The last time a Big Ten school won the NCAA Tournament, Dusty May was a senior at Indiana working as a team manager for Bob Knight and preparing for a life in coaching.
Considering the Michigan boss turns 50 in December, it has indeed been a long, long time since Michigan State — led by Tom Izzo, Mateen Cleaves and the rest of the Flintstones — captured the 2000 NCAA title in Indianapolis.
Now, all these years later, May has constructed the Big Ten’s most dominant team since Izzo’s champs, which means the Wolverines have a great chance to snap the league’s 25-year absence from the “One Shining Moment” spotlight.
As of Friday morning, Michigan was the odds-on favorite to win it all according to BetMGM, Caesars, DraftKings, FanDuel and presumably every other online sportsbook.
If you don’t care what the gambling world thinks, Michigan ranks No. 1 in Wins Above Bubble — a crucial metric the NCAA Tournament committee loves — along with a close No. 2 to Duke in the national NET ranking and KenPom.
Michigan’s KenPom rating of +38.39 ranks as the fourth-highest number since Ken Pomeroy started calculating his rankings in 1996-97. These Wolverines — who stand out because of their depth and their frontcourt led by likely first-team All-American Yaxel Lendeborg — trail only 1999 Duke, 2024 Duke…and the Duke team that just edged them on Saturday night in Washington, D.C.
Because Michigan boasts such a high ceiling, yet has struggled to reach it the last few games, May spends a lot of his time these days alternating between boosting and cajoling his bunch.
After Tuesday’s relatively narrow home win over Minnesota that clinched a share of the Big Ten title, May used such phrases as “We have such big and lofty goals in front of us…” and “I know this: The further we get into this, our guys have a further gear they can kick into…” and “Proud of our guys that we’ve been able to weather the storms to go through this (Big Ten) marathon that we’re on to get to this point, but if you get to the last five miles of a marathon and you collapse and you don’t stay hydrated, then it’s all for naught. We’ve got to keep pushing, keep moving forward and getting better.”
But Michigan (26-2) ain’t the only Big Ten squad on the short list of teams with a legitimate shot to capture the NCAA title on April 6 in Indianapolis.
Other Big Ten teams that can win the title
How do we know? Thanks to the steady improvements made in statistical analysis, predictive metrics and results-based metrics over the last 10-odd years — think Ken Pomeroy KenPom), Bart Torvik (T-Rank), Kevin Pauga (KPI), Evan Miyakawa, etc. — it’s easier to identify the teams truly worthy of a championship.
To put it another way, it’s nearly impossible for a great team’s potential to be camouflaged by a less than incredible record. For example, Illinois enters Friday’s visit from Michigan with a 22-6 record. That’s only good for No. 10 in the current Associated Press Top 25 and No. 11 in the coaches poll.
But KenPom sees through the record and ranks the Fighting Illini, who boast the nation’s most efficient offense, as the nation’s No. 4 team. Torvik has the Illini at No. 5.
It might not sound like a big difference whether you’re considered the nation’s fifth-best or 10th-best team, but the last decade’s worth of results suggests it’s huge.
Here are the last 10 NCAA champions and where they stood in KenPom’s national rankings when the brackets were revealed on Selection Sunday:
2025: Florida 2nd
2024: Connecticut 1st
2023: Connecticut 4th
2022: Kansas 6th
2021: Baylor 4th
2019: Virginia 1st
2018: Villanova 2nd
2017: UNC 3rd
2016: Villanova 5th
2015: Duke 6th
Of course, there’s no rule you have to be among the nation’s top six on March 15 or you can’t win the NCAA championship, but it’s clearly the trend. That’s why Illinois coach Brad Underwood doesn’t give a spit that Michigan has all but clinched the conference crown.
“I couldn’t tell you the Big Ten standings — and I mean that,” Underwood said Thursday. “I couldn’t tell you what that is. Michigan’s obviously in a place to win the league, but I couldn’t tell you who’s where. That is an absolute waste of my time.
“I do care about and look at the analytics and where we’re at and the NET and the KenPom and Torvik and all of that. I pay attention to that because it’s got wide-ranging stuff that helps me gauge my team much more than (the standings).”
With Michigan at No. 2 and Illinois at No. 4 in the current KenPoms, that’s two Big Ten teams that can dream on a title. Does anybody else belong alongside Duke, Arizona, Florida, Houston and Iowa State?
Purdue, No. 8 in KenPom, has enough time to climb into the top six, but the Boilers keep flunking key showdowns. With Thursday’s 2-point loss to Michigan State, they’ve dropped home games to Michigan, Illinois and Sparty — and the 23-point home loss to Iowa State on Dec. 6 also will resonate come NCAA seeding time.
So, No. 10 Michigan State? Perhaps, but it feels like Izzo has a team similar to last year’s that had to fight its guts out just to reach the Elite Eight. Izzo ratified that viewpoint during Peacock’s postgame show Thursday while sharing how much he enjoyed spending 90 minutes with former Purdue coach Gene Keady that morning. Among other things, they talked about how many teams today don’t seem as together.
“I said, ‘You know, that’s one thing I have: We’re not overly talented, but we are connected and together,’ ” Izzo said.
And No. 12 Nebraska? It has been a legendary year for Fred Hoiberg’s squad, but how can you project an NCAA championship for a school that has never won an NCAA Tournament game?
Sports
The Five Best Quarterbacks Available in the 2026 NFL Offseason
At least five teams are in dire need of a quarterback upgrade. More than that are considering one.
As per offseason tradition in the NFL, demand far outpaces supply in free agency and the draft in 2026.
Starting at the top of the current draft order, the Raiders (No. 1 overall), Jets (No. 2), Cardinals (No. 3), Browns (No. 6), Dolphins (11) are most desperate for a fix. A few have veterans on hand that haven’t worked out with a previous coaching regime.
Keeping them around under the guise of a fresh start might become reality because, frankly, what else are they going to do?
Count the Steelers, Vikings, Saints — no, I’m not yet calling Tyler Shough a bust — and Falcons are all on shaky turf at the QB spot. They might not be defined as desperate, but could find themselves knocking on that door.
Unless an outfit truly covets Kirk Cousins, Justin Fields or Geno Smith, where can they turn? These are the five best quarterbacks available this offseason.
Fernando Mendoza, Indiana
The No. 1 pick barring a calamity of a pro day or Godfather trade offer for the top spot from a team not planning to secure the Heisman Trophy winner, Mendoza might be the second coming of Cousins or an off-brand Joe Burrow.
Neither would be the worst-case scenario for the Raiders or Jets, who are decades into swinging and missing at quarterback and have the assets to make the match a reality.
Kyler Murray, Arizona Cardinals
For a player yet to prove he’s a franchise-caliber quarterback at 29 years old, we know there will be seats available on the Murray bandwagon until he wins consistently.
But if your alternative today is hoping Michael Penix Jr. avoid another round of Operation in Atlanta or banking on JJ McCarthy suddenly finding it, it could be time to circle Murray’s name on the QB board. He’s all but talked his way out of Arizona. The new coaching staff of the Cardinals is better off to break here and begin anew. Can Murray pull a Sam Darnold with the Vikings under Kevin O’Connell or experience a revival with the Dolphins as a Tua replacement?
Ty Simpson, Alabama
He isn’t the classic boom-or-bust quarterback prospect because of his age and plus decision-making and processing from the pocket. Even so, nobody can argue Simpson as a proven or complete product after one season as a starter. The cost and value debates will rage on this prospect and any other under consideration as the second quarterback off the board in the 2026 draft. He doesn’t have a first-round grade for every team and there will be arguments made for draft prospects with higher upside.
Tua Tagovailoa, Dolphins
Wonder aloud how the Dolphins might reconcile the bill inherited by the new regime in Miami, which calls for a $99.2 cap hit in 2026, but don’t doubt they are ready to let him walk.
It’s highly unlikely a team wants to trade for Tagovailoa but he’ll get a look as a QB2 for a team unsettled at the position. He could compete with McCarthy if the Vikings don’t find a better solution, head to Arizona with an endorsement from Mike McDaniel to Mike LaFleur, or get a Russell Wilson-type audition as a short-term starter with the Falcons while Penix Jr. heals from an ACL tear. HIs game is built for the dome home field.
Aaron Rodgers, unrestricted free agent
Another one-year fix who could be back in Pittsburgh or try a reunion with Nathaniel Hackett with the Cardinals.
His best play if the Vikings are willing would be Minnesota. As long as the Vikings have the line in front of him, Rodgers flinging the ball to Justin Jefferson in a division with the Packers would be the fitting curtain call to his prolific career.
Sports
Daniil Medvedev wins Dubai title in walkover
Jan 23, 2026; Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Daniil Medvedev in action against Fabian Marozsan of Hungary in the third round of the men’s singles at the Australian Open at Margaret Court Arena in Melbourne Park. Mandatory Credit: Mike Frey-Imagn Images Third-seeded Daniil Medvedev won the Dubai Duty Free Tennis Championships on Saturday when Tallon Griekspoor of the Netherlands was forced to withdraw due to a hamstring injury in the United Arab Emirates.
Griekspoor defeated another Russian, fifth-seeded Andrey Rublev, in straight sets in the semifinals on Friday but fought through the injury suffered in that match. He said after his victory that he would have retired from the match if he had lost the second set.
For Medvedev, this is his 23rd career title and second in Dubai (2023). This is the first time he has won a tournament for a second time.
He defeated top-seeded Felix Auger-Aliassime of Canada in the semifinal and didn’t drop a set in the tournament.
“Not how I want to win a final. Hoping the injury for (Griekspoor) is not too bad and wishing him a speedy recovery,” Medvedev wrote on X.
–Field Level Media
