Entertainment
Iconic Sci-fi Series Predicts This Year Will Be The End Of The World
By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

What if this year were the end of the world as you know it? That sounds like crazy talk, of course, but this is the year that has long been prophesied by one of the greatest sci-fi franchises as the beginning of World War III. That prophecy comes to us from the last IP you’d expect to predict the end of the world: Star Trek!
Obviously, Star Trek is known for its optimistic portrayal of a future where most people do not have to worry about modern concerns such as poverty, disease, and war. However, a major part of the franchise lore is that things have to get incredibly worse before they start to get better. Humanity doesn’t begin working towards its bright, shiny future until it survives World War III, a catastrophic global conflict that is supposed to start in 2026.
World War III Starts With One Man

Fittingly enough, much of our franchise knowledge of World War III comes from Star Trek: The Original Series. Classic episodes like “Bread and Circuses” and “The Savage Curtain” tell us that a man named Colonel Phillip Green was responsible for leading a bunch of ecoterrorists in attacks that ultimately claimed the lives of 37 million people. He may actually be the one responsible for causing this war, as it is mentioned in “The Savage Curtain” that he “led” a genocidal war, later identified as WWIII.
Frustratingly, The Original Series doesn’t tell us much more about Colonel Green except that he was infamous for striking his enemies in the midst of ostensibly peaceful negotiations. Later, Star Trek: Enterprise clarified that he used his troops to kill those affected with radiation sickness and other conditions that he considered “impurities.” He was worried about these traits being passed on to children, making Green an explicitly Hitler-like figure, right down to his obsession with eugenics.
And The Rockets’ Red Glare

It was the fan-favorite film Star Trek: First Contact that specified that World War III began in 2026, and the movie also put a name to one of the factions involved: the Eastern Coalition. The first episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation revealed that some of the different factions used drugs to control their soldiers. Discovery and Strange New Worlds specified that as late as 2053, nuclear bombs were being dropped on cities like Richmond, Washington, New York, and Paris.
Speaking of Strange New Worlds, that show used an interesting retcon to tie World War III with a major conflict first mentioned in The Original Series: the Eugenics Wars. During Earth’s troubled history, unethical scientists began experimenting with selective breeding and genetic editing, and their ultimate goal was to create a race of supersoldiers. Those soldiers were known as Augments, and their most famous member was Khan Noonien Singh, who would later go on to have multiple iconic fights with an equally legendary figure: Captain James T. Kirk.
A Real Khan Job

Predictably, these Augments tried to take over the world, seizing power in over 40 nations before they were ultimately overthrown by humanity. Most Augments were tried and executed as war criminals, but Khan and dozens of his followers escaped in a sleeper sheep, where they were later awoken from cryogenic stasis by Captain Kirk. In the classic episode “Space Seed,” Spock mentioned a very specific fact that Star Trek spent decades trying to run from: that the Eugenics Wars lasted from 1992-1996.
Why has Trek been running from this bit of trivia, and how does it connect to World War III? After Star Trek: The Next Generation came out in 1987, it became increasingly hard for the writers (especially after the end of the Cold War) to imagine the ‘90s as a period of major global upheaval. The best evidence of this is that in the Voyager episode where they traveled back to 1996 (“Future’s End”), and despite this being the last year of the Eugenics Wars, there is no sign that America had experienced any of the worldwide conflict that took the lives of over 30 million people.
Burned By The Retcon

Strange New Worlds addressed this matter in a very unexpected way. “Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow” revealed that the Temporal War and assorted meddling time travelers ended up affecting Khan’s personal timeline. Now, the tyrant was born later in the timeline, but his rise to power is still inevitable: in the Picard episode “Farewell,” the mad scientist Doctor Adam Soong was last seen in 2024, examining a file (from 1996, no less) titled “Project Khan.”
That would put Khan on the right track to be a major player when World War III kicks off in 2026, but how do we know for sure that he was involved? In the premiere Strange New Worlds episode (“Strange New Worlds”), Captain Pike gave a speech to a group of aliens where he mentioned how Earth’s last major global conflict had gone by different names over the years. “We called it the Second Civil War, then the Eugenics War, and finally just World War III.”
No Place On Earth Was Safe

Previously, in The Original Series episode “Space Seed,” Spock claimed (while admitting that records of the time period were “fragmentary”) that the Eugenics Wars simply took place during World War III. Now, Pike is retroactively claiming that the Eugenics Wars and World War III are considered the same conflict. However, we do know that these different names likely referred to distinct periods of time during this overall conflict.
That’s because the first name for what would be called a global conflict was “the Second Civil War;” at this point, the presentation Pike is showing to a group of aliens shows footage of the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol. Putting aside the wacky politics of this as a creative decision (is Star Trek really linking Khan and Donald Trump in official canon?!?), this gives us an approximate timeline of events. The Second Civil War starts in early 2021, the Eugenics Wars begin sometime after 2024, and World War III breaks out in 2026.
2026: The End Of The World As We Know It

Hey, that’s this year! Since Star Trek has predicted that this is the end of the world, you should probably take the time to put your affairs in order. Tell your loved ones how much they mean to you, make time for your own needs, and remove anything from your life that no longer sparks joy.
After the last episode of Starfleet Academy, that probably includes your Paramount+ subscription. Trust me: even if the world doesn’t end in apocalyptic disaster, you don’t need a streamer whose exclusives feel like every single biblical plague, all rolled into one!
Entertainment
NASAs incredible new telescope will offer an atlas of the universe
NASA has completed its next space observatory, built to create sharp, panoramic maps of the universe while revealing how the most mysterious, invisible substances and distant worlds shape the cosmos.
About a quarter-century after the Hubble Telescope reshaped astronomy, and a few years into the era of the James Webb Space Telescope, NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope will join them not as a replacement, but as a big-picture partner. Where Hubble and Webb zoom in for close‑ups, Roman will capture Hubble‑like detail across areas about 100 times larger, turning isolated snapshots into sweeping surveys that show the very scaffolding of the universe.
At NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, engineers are wrapping up prelaunch testing on the cutting-edge telescope. Next, the observatory will travel 900 miles to Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida, where teams will prepare it for launch.
That could happen as early as this September, about eight months ahead of schedule, NASA managers said at a news conference on Tuesday, April 21. Once in space, Roman will head to a stable orbit about 1 million miles from Earth, near the same region where Webb orbits the sun, and begin a years‑long campaign of deep space imaging.
“We didn’t want to wait to launch the Nancy Grace Roman. We’re eight months ahead of schedule,” said Nicky Fox, NASA’s associate administrator of science. “Everybody felt the urgency. Everybody was sprinting towards this.”
Named for Nancy Grace Roman, who became the agency’s first chief of astronomy and one of its earliest female executives, the telescope reflects a legacy of opening new windows on the universe from above Earth’s atmosphere. Nicknamed the “mother of Hubble,” Roman helped lay the groundwork in the 1960s for a whole fleet of space telescopes.
A wide shot of the dark universe
At the heart of the mission is Roman’s eight-foot-wide mirror, the same size as Hubble’s, paired with a powerful camera that sees in infrared light, like Webb. That camera’s field of view is Roman’s superpower. In a single shot, it can image vast swaths of sky that Hubble simply can’t match.
Because a space telescope can only see one patch of sky at a time, it has to take many separate “pointings” — individual shots aimed at slightly different spots — and stitch them together into a mosaic.
In 2023, Ami Choi, an astrophysicist and scientist for Roman’s wide field camera, contrasted the difference between Hubble and the new telescope. To photograph the Andromeda Galaxy, Hubble has to take 400 smaller images and stitch them together. For Roman’s camera, that should only take two pointings, she said.
This wide, sharp vision is what scientists need to study the so-called “dark universe.” Ordinary matter — the stuff that makes up stars, planets, and even people — accounts for only about 5 percent of the cosmos. The bulk of it is dark matter and dark energy, which do not emit light but leave clues where they’ve influenced space’s expansion and the arrangement of galaxies.
Mashable Light Speed
“Current observations hint that our standard model of the universe is incorrect,” said Julie McHenry, senior project scientist, referring to cosmologists’ best recipe for the universe. “Roman will be able to confirm these and set us on the path to understanding what’s right.”
Roman will trace those clues in several ways at once. By mapping the positions and shapes of hundreds of millions of galaxies, it will show how structures have grown from the early universe to today. Subtle distortions in galaxy shapes will reveal how clumps of invisible space stuff bend their light on the way to us, exposing the hidden dark matter. At the same time, Roman will discover and track large numbers of a special kind of exploding star, known as Type Ia supernovas; their predictable brightness lets astronomers measure how quickly space has expanded over time.

Imaging large space targets, such as the Andromeda Galaxy, will require far fewer smaller images to stitch together than other flagship observatories.
Credit: NASA composite image
Taken together, these measurements will allow scientists to test competing ideas about dark matter, dark energy, and even the laws of gravity themselves with far greater precision than ever before. Other observatories can make similar kinds of measurements, but none combines Roman’s sharpness and sky coverage in the infrared, NASA mission leaders say, which lets it see more distant and dust-covered galaxies.
A new census of distant exoplanets
Roman’s wide‑field power also makes it skilled at exoplanet hunting. Previous missions like Kepler and TESS mostly found planets close to their stars, where their repeated crossings dim starlight in a regular rhythm. Roman will focus on a different region of planetary systems: the cooler, outer zones, where worlds similar to Jupiter and Saturn reside. It may even find wandering planets that aren’t tethered to stars.
To do this, Roman will repeatedly monitor dense star fields toward the center of our Milky Way. As a foreground star passes in front of a more distant one, its gravity will briefly magnify the background star’s light. If the foreground star carries planets, they can produce smaller, telltale blips in that brightening. This technique, called microlensing, works best in precisely the kind of crowded, faint, and distant regions that Roman is expected to capture.

Optical Engineer Bente Eegholm inspects the primary mirror for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope.
Credit: NASA / Chris Gunn
Over its mission, Roman will attempt to record thousands of these microlensing events, revealing planets at distances and masses other surveys mostly miss. From that haul, astronomers will compare our solar system’s architecture with many others and judge whether having inner rocky worlds and outer giant planets is the status quo or something more rare.
Roman will also test an advanced coronagraph — a system of masks and mirrors that blocks a star’s glare so the telescope can try to see the faint glow of planets around it. On Roman, this is more of a technology trial than an everyday science instrument, but if it works, it will set the stage for a future observatory whose main goal is to directly image Earth‑like worlds around other sun‑like stars.
“What astronomers can do today with coronagraph instruments is see planets that are maybe a million times fainter than their stars,” Vanessa Bailey, NASA’s Roman coronagraph scientist, told Mashable. “What we’re doing with the Roman coronagraph is hopefully getting to 10 million to 100 million times fainter, maybe even a little bit more, in the best case scenario.”
Catching the universe in motion
Roman is also built for studying how the sky changes, creating a veritable library of “before” and “after” shots.

Technicians assemble the solar panels on the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope.
Credit: NASA / Sydney Rohde
One of its major surveys will repeatedly scan high‑latitude regions of the sky, away from the plane of the Milky Way. By returning to the same fields every few days, Roman will catch supernovas as they ignite and fade, watch black holes light up as they feed on nearby material, and uncover other short-lived, dramatic events across the distant universe. Its infrared vision will reveal explosions and flares that dust clouds hide from visible‑light telescopes.
Another core program will stare toward the Milky Way’s central bulge. There, Roman will track how the brightness of millions of stars rises and falls on timescales of minutes to months. Those records will not only power the microlensing planet search but also expose other phenomena, such as neutron stars and black holes.
Because Roman will cover such large areas with fine detail, its images will also become a long‑lasting reference tool. When other telescopes later spot something odd — a burst of high‑energy radiation, for instance, or an unusual variable star — astronomers will be able to pull Roman’s earlier images and see what was there before the excitement.
“The images it captures will be so large there is not a screen in existence large enough to show them,” said NASA administrator Jared Isaacman. “Roman will give the Earth a new Atlas of the universe. I think it’s worth pausing for a moment just to think about how really incredible that is.”
Entertainment
400K MagSafe power banks recalled after fatal fire, the 10th power bank recall in a year
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and Casely reannounced a power bank recall this April after a fire linked to the device fatally injured a user. This is the tenth power bank recall in the United States in the last 12 months, and Anker recalled 1.5 million power banks in 2025.
The recall affects an estimated 429,200 Casely 5,000-mAh MagSafe Power Pods (Model E33A), which were originally recalled in 2025. The MagSafe power banks need to be completely replaced.

Back of Casely power banks.
Credit: CPSC
Affected customers should stop using the portable power banks immediately. They can also contact Casely to receive a free replacement.
“The recalled lithium-ion battery in the power banks can overheat and ignite, posing risk of serious injury or death from fire and burn hazards to consumers,” the CPSC stated on its recall website.
Mashable Light Speed
The Brooklyn-based company is reannouncing the recall after receiving 51 reports of the lithium-ion battery overheating, expanding, and/or catching fire while charging smartphones, “resulting in six minor burn injuries.”
However, in the past year, the CPSC says 28 more reports have been made, including explosions that caused a serious accident on an airplane and one death.
In August 2024, a 75-year-old woman from New Jersey, was charging her cell phone with the power bank on her lap when it caught on fire and exploded. The victim suffered second and third degree burns and later passed away from complications from her injuries. In February 2026, a 47-year-old woman was charging her cell phone with the power bank on an airplane when it caught on fire and exploded, resulting in the victim suffering first degree burns.
How to check your Casely Power Pod
Worried you may own one of the 429,000 recalled power banks? It’s easy to check if your device is included in the recall.
On the back of the device, look for the device’s model number, as show in a picture provided by the CPSC. If the model number reads “E33A,” then stop using the device immediately.

Look for the model number.
Credit: CPSC
More information on requesting a replacement power bank is available on the CPSC and Casely recall websites.
Entertainment
The new Dyson Supersonic Travel is the cheapest Supersonic yet
Table of Contents
Nearly three years ago, I asked if the (then) $429 Dyson Supersonic was still worth the price of entry.
These days, with the Supersonic line having expanded, the standard model having increased in price to $449.99, and the most expensive version of the hair dryer topping out at $549.99, it’s a question that feels even more apt.
The good news? If you’re not super into the idea of spending about $500 for a hair dryer, Dyson just announced the Dyson Supersonic Travel, a $299.99 model of its famous hair tool. In addition to its lower price point, it comes with more travel-friendly proportions and features.
As someone who’s personally tested Supersonics (and their many dupes), I took a closer look at the latest Dyson beauty launch to gather everything you need to know.
The design differences of the Dyson Supersonic Travel
In short, the Supersonic Travel is the standard Supersonic but smaller. According to Dyson, that comes out to exactly 32 percent smaller and 25 percent lighter than the OG Supersonic. In other words, it’s 0.7 pounds to the standard Supersonic’s 1.8 pounds, and 8.7 inches tall to the larger model’s 10 inches.
Mashable Trend Report
This model also comes with one attachment, the styling concentrator, a la the now-discontinued Dyson Supersonic Origin (which ran for $399.99). For comparison, the $449.99 Supersonic comes with three attachments: a styling concentrator, diffuser, and wide-tooth comb. For all five attachments, you’ll have to shell out $549.99.

The Supersonic Travel is compatible with all original and Supersonic Nural attachments.
Credit: Dyson
The same attachments can be used between the Travel, original, and Supersonic Nural dryers. This means opting for the Travel could technically save you some money — individual attachments range from $19.99 to $44.99. If you only use a styling concentrator and diffuser, for instance, the total cost of a Travel dryer with the extra attachment purchase would come out to $344.98, making it still over $100 cheaper than the three-attachment original Supersonic.
The Supersonic Travel is more versatile in some ways, and less so in others
Functionality-wise, the Supersonic Travel is a slightly different product from the other Supersonics in the line. It has anywhere from 1,000 to 1,220 watts of power and an airflow speed of 11.6 liters per second, compared to the 1,600 watts and 13.3 liters per second of the standard Supersonic. In other words, the bigger dryer is slightly more powerful, so it wouldn’t be unreasonable to expect longer dry times.
The standard Supersonic and Supersonic Nural also feature four heats and three air speeds, where the Supersonic Travel features three heats and two air speeds.
The best noise-cancelling headphones for flying: 8 picks to improve your travel experience
That said, the Supersonic Travel has universal voltage compatibility, so it can be used from 100 to 240 volts, whereas the other Supersonics are locked into 120 volt compatibility.
In terms of its portability, it’s also worth noting the Supersonic Travel weighs the same as the Supersonic r, a professional grade hair dryer (priced as such at $549.99) that’s become more popular due in part to being lightweight and easy to maneuver.
Where to buy the Dyson Supersonic Travel
The Dyson Supersonic Travel is available for $299.99 at Dyson’s website, Amazon, and Best Buy. If you buy at the former, you will receive a complimentary $59.99 travel bag along with the hair dryer.
