Connect with us

Entertainment

How Worf Accidentally Created Star Trek's 2009 Reboot

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

After Enterprise fizzled out, a new film brought the world’s greatest sci-fi franchise back to life: Star Trek (2009), a snazzy reboot that brought back the characters and impeccable vibes of The Original Series. To mollify fans worried that the new film would completely retcon older Star Trek media, Paramount set all of its Trek reboot films in a parallel universe that was completely different from the familiar “prime” universe. What most fans don’t realize, though, is that this parallel “Kelvinverse” (so named after Kirk’s father’s doomed starship) would have been impossible without “Parallels,” an often-overlooked episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation.

In that episode, Worf returns from a bat’leth tournament only to find himself slipping in and out of different realities; this allows him to experience the lives of different Worfs while seeing how different things could be aboard the Enterprise-D. He is married to Deanna Troi in one reality, for example, and is the first officer of the ship in another. Eventually, Worf (with the help of Data, Geordi, and the rest of the senior officers) discovers that this all started because his shuttle accidentally weakened the barrier between different quantum realities, and he is able to fly back to his own reality while closing the dimensional fissure behind him.

How Worf’s Multiverse Adventure Created The Star Trek Reboot

This makes for a fun episode (especially if you’re a Worf fan), but what does this story have to do with Star Trek (2009)? Back in 2008, that film’s cowriter, Bob Orci, gave an exclusive interview to TrekMovie, and their conversation focused primarily on how the new movie’s timeline could exist without erasing all the franchise lore that came before it. Orci basically gave fans a crash course on quantum mechanics, and he cited Data’s comments from “Parallels” to sum up that “all possibilities that can happen do happen” in various other realities.

That may sound pretty basic, especially for those who are familiar with Marvel’s various movies and TV shows involving the Multiverse. But the MCU was less than a year old when Orci gave this interview, and the Multiverse was not yet even a sparkle in Kevin Feige’s eye. Therefore, the writer walked Trek fans through how the upcoming Kelvinverse film was rooted strongly in both real-world quantum mechanics (which the interviewer helpfully pointed out is known as the Many Worlds Theory) and the Trek lore established in “Parallels.”

The Many Yawns Theory?

For Star Trek fans, the Many Worlds Theory is both blessing and curse: it allows for telling stories in different realities, contextualizing settings like the Mirror Universe and explaining how the Kelvinverse and any future reboot realities can exist alongside the Prime Universe of shows like The Original Series and The Next Generation. But (as Red Letter Media recently pointed out), this theory arguably cheapens the drama of the choices our characters make. Not only is there a dimension where they made a completely different choice, but the existence of countless other dimensions means it doesn’t really matter who lives and who dies because everyone is alive somewhere else.

Whether you love or hate the narrative sandbox it created, “Parallels” paved the way for the existence of Star Trek (2009), a movie that saved the franchise when Trek was falling into cultural obscurity. Those reboot films are controversial among some fans, but their success undeniably helped make Star Trek into a mainstream hit once again. If you’re one of the fans who hated it, that probably won’t bother anyone involved; after all, quantum mechanics tells us that there’s a universe out there where this is your favorite film series of all time! 


source

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

How to watch Marty Supreme: When is Timothée Chalamet’s Oscar-nominated film streaming?

Table of Contents

It’s hard to escape Timothée Chalamet in film these days. First, he was Wonka, then he conquered Bob Dylan, and now he’s taking audiences into the high-stakes world of 1950s table tennis as ping pong star Marty Mauser.

Directed by Josh Safdie and distributed by A24, Marty Supreme is a major contender this awards season. Chalamet has already won the Golden Globe for his performance as Marty, and we wouldn’t be surprised if he took home the Oscar (finally). The sports dramedy also has a fantastic ensemble cast that includes Gwyneth Paltrow, Odessa A’zion, Kevin O’Leary, Tyler Okonma (aka Tyler, the Creator), Abel Ferrara, and Fran Drescher.

While it’s still floating around in theaters, you don’t have to battle the cold to watch it. Here’s everything you need to know to catch it from your couch.

What is Marty Supreme about?

Inspired by the real-life story of table tennis champion Marty Reisman, Marty Mauser (Chalamet) is a man with a big dream — to achieve greatness and bring ping pong to the masses. Already a legend in his own mind, though he’s barely scraping by, Marty just needs to pay his way to the championship overseas first. And he’ll do anything to get there.

“Exploding with chaos, character, and kinetic energy, Marty Supreme is a movie about the city’s scoundrels, their sins, and why we love them anyway,” writes Mashable’s entertainment editor Kristy Puchko.

Check out the official trailer for a glimpse at Marty Supreme:

Is Marty Supreme worth watching?

Now the highest-grossing A24 film domestically, Marty Supreme has surpassed Everything Everywhere All at Once in North America with over $80 million. Audiences aren’t just showing up for it; they’re loving it. Currently, the sports comedy holds an 82 percent audience rating and an impressive 93 percent critic rating on Rotten Tomatoes — with most cheering on Chalamet’s performance. He’s already won the Golden Globe and is nominated for an Oscar. That’s not all, though; the film is also nominated for Best Picture, Best Production Design, Best Film Editing, Best Directing, Best Cinematography, Best Casting, Best Costume Design, and Best Original Screenplay.

“This zinging dialogue, racing score, and electric cast collide to create cinema that celebrates New York, while recognizing its warts with a bleeding grin. All of this makes Marty Supreme an unusual crowdpleaser,” Mashable’s Puchko writes in her review. “Full of wild humor and shocking turns, it has its audience in a chokehold of tension and surprise, rarely letting up for us to breathe. And yet, what a thrill to be breathless.”

Check out Mashable’s full review of Marty Supreme.

How to watch Marty Supreme at home

Timothee Chalamet as Marty Mauser in "Marty Supreme"


Credit: A24

A24 was expected to release Marty Supreme on digital on Feb. 3, but that date was pushed back to Feb. 10 for some reason. We’re still waiting for details on its streaming debut. We’ve broken down the details below.

Buy or rent on digital

Marty Supreme made its at-home debut at digital-on-demand retailers on Feb. 10. You can purchase the film for your digital library for $24.99 or rent it for $5 less. If you choose to rent, you’ll get access for 30 days, but just 48 hours once you start watching.

Quick links to buy/rent Marty Supreme on digital:

Stream it on HBO Max

While we haven’t got word on a specific streaming release date yet for Marty Supreme, we do know that it will make its debut on HBO Max.

A24 just renewed its output deal with Warner Bros. Discovery, so new A24 theatrical releases will still exclusively stream on HBO Max before anywhere else. If Marty Supreme follows a similar theater-to-streaming trajectory as other recently released A24 movies — like Sorry, Baby, Bring Her Back, and The Smashing Machine — we estimate that it will hit HBO Max sometime in April 2026.

HBO Max subscriptions start at $10.99 per month (thanks to its most recent price hike), but there are some ways to save some money on your plan. Check out the best HBO Max streaming deals below.

The best HBO Max streaming deals

Best for most people: Save 16% on HBO Max annual subscriptions

$109.99 per year (save $21.89)

$184.99 per year (save $36.89)

The best way to save on HBO Max on any given day is to sign up for the annual plan over the monthly plan. The HBO Max Basic plan with ads typically costs $10.99 per month, but if you pay for an entire year upfront, that price drops down to just $9.17. You’ll pay $109.99 total for the year, which saves you about 16% compared to paying each month.

Rather go ad-free? The annual HBO Max Standard or Premium plans will also save you about 16% over their monthly counterparts. The Standard tier costs either $18.49 per month or $184.99 per year (about $15.42 per month), while the Premium tier costs either $22.99 per month or $229.99 per year (about $19.17 per month). Both tiers unlock ad-free viewing, but the Premium tier also adds 4K Ultra HD video quality, Dolby Atmos immersive audio, and the ability to download more offline content.

Get HBO Max for free: Switch to Cricket’s Supreme Unlimited plan

Credit: HBO Max / Cricket

Free for Cricket customers on the Supreme Unlimited plan

Want to get HBO Max for free? One of the best ways in 2026 is to switch your phone plan to Cricket’s $60 per month Supreme Unlimited plan. It includes HBO Max Basic with ads for free — a $10.99 per month value. When you open up the HBO Max app or website, you’ll just select Cricket as your provider and use your credentials to log in.

Best HBO Max deal for students: Save 50% on HBO Max Basic with ads

$5.49 per month for 12 months

College students can watch Marty Supreme when it hits streaming by signing up for an entire year of HBO Max with ads for half price. Verify your student status through UNiDAYS and retrieve the unique discount code to drop the price from $10.99 to just $5.49 per month. After 12 months, the price will jump back up to the full $10.99 monthly fee unless you cancel.

Best bundle deal: Get HBO Max, Disney+, and Hulu for up to 42% off

Credit: Disney / Hulu / HBO Max

$19.99 per month (with ads), $32.99 per month (no ads)

You’ll get the most bang for your buck if you opt for the Disney+ bundle deal that includes Disney+, Hulu, and HBO Max for just $19.99 per month with ads. That lineup of streamers would usually cost you $34.97 per month if you paid separately for each, so you’ll keep an extra $15 in your pocket monthly. If you prefer to watch without ads, the bundle will run you $32.99 per month as opposed to $56.47. That’s up to 42% in savings for unlimited access to all three streaming libraries.

UPDATE: Feb. 10, 2026, 3:00 a.m. EST This article has been updated with the latest streaming information for “Marty Supreme.”

source

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Jon Stewart hits back at MAGAs reaction to Bad Bunnys Super Bowl halftime show

Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl LX halftime show may have been brimming with popular music, Easter eggs, and celebrity cameos, but not everyone was a fan.

In The Daily Show clip above, Jon Stewart discusses the right’s reaction to the show, from the Kid Rock-fronted alternative event to right-wing pundits complaining that they could have found someone “more uniting”.

“Why the f*** is it the Super Bowl halftime entertainer’s job to unify the country?” asks Stewart. “In what world is that their job? Oh, isn’t there another person whose job description is much more along those lines?”

Stewart goes on to share Donald Trump’s Truth Social reaction to the performance, in which he called Bad Bunny “absolutely terrible”.

“You know, the right has a lot of balls, complaining that Bad Bunny didn’t do enough to unify this country, when you only found out a few days ago that Puerto Rico’s a part of it,” says Stewart. “And before you get your panties in una torsión, a unifying pro tip might be to tell your guy to stop tweeting out racist slop during, I don’t know, Black History Month.”

source

Continue Reading

Entertainment

New Star Trek Spinoff Is Running Out Of Time

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

The new Star Trek spinoff, Starfleet Academy, has proven to be very controversial, but its fans always offer the same rebuttal to any criticism of the show: “give it time.” The logic goes that this show might need time to find its footing, just like The Next Generation and Voyager did. However, given that the show is limited to 10 episodes per season and a maximum of four seasons, Starfleet Academy is officially running out of time to impress viewers.

This reaction to a new spinoff began with Star Trek: The Next Generation, whose first season was its absolute worst. Season 2 wasn’t much better, but the show (thanks largely to new showrunner Michael Piller) transformed into must-see TV with Season 3. After Deep Space Nine had a similarly rocky Season 1, it became gospel among many Trek fans that you should always give a new series a season or two to really find its footing.

It Gets Ugly When You Run The Numbers

Needless to say, this has become the most common defense Starfleet Academy fans have used against any and all criticisms of the show. Those fans love to make comparisons to TNG and say that critics should give these cadets time to find their space legs, just like we gave Picard and crew time. However, what these Starfleet Academy fanboys don’t realize is that the new show is racing the clock, and it’s all Paramount’s fault.

Back in the Golden Age of Star Trek, shows ran for seven seasons, with (outside of the occasional writer’s strike) 26 episodes per season. This is why shows like Voyager could afford to have a rocky first season: whenever there was a bad episode, fans could reasonably expect that a good one was around the corner. Even if the first two seasons were wildly rocky (looking at you, The Next Generation), there would be 130 episodes left that would be, relatively speaking, very good.

Each Season Is A Bubble, Waiting To Pop

But those were the salad days of network television. In the streaming era, shows are more streamlined, and Starfleet Academy (like Strange New Worlds before it) has only 10 episodes per season. Moreover, executive producer and co-showrunner Alex Kurtzman has confirmed that the show is designed to last only four seasons, mirroring the four years it takes the cadets to complete their academy training.

That means that Starfleet Academy has a much more limited window to find its audience than fans think. Every episode represents ten percent of an entire season, meaning that a few bad episodes can make the entire season feel like a mixed bag. This is why fans began turning against the more whimsical episodes of Strange New Worlds: while the occasional lighthearted story can be fun, it feels weird when 30 percent of your third season is devoted to overly wacky episodes.

Starfleet Academy is facing a similar problem because the writers keep dragging decent stories down with juvenile humor. Tales of parental trauma and racial diaspora exist uneasily alongside jokes about cadets eating comm badges and vomiting glitter (incredibly, these are different cadets). By the time the show ends, fans may well wonder how much more character development we might have gotten if there had been fewer scenes of farting fish, drunken dancing, and other try-hard attempts to make us laugh.

The Show Will Be Over Before You Know It

It’s also important to remember that Starfleet Academy lasting four seasons is actually a best-case scenario. Previously, NuTrek shows like Discovery and Lower Decks were prematurely canceled by Paramount. Strange New Worlds, meanwhile, unexpectedly had its final season (which recently finished filming) cut in half. While Starfleet Academy has already been renewed for a second season, poor reception of Season 1 could very well get the show prematurely canceled.

That may already be happening, as Starfleet Academy recently tumbled out of the Top 10 list on Paramount+. With any luck, the show will continue to smooth out its rough edges and grow more impressive over time, like The Next Generation before it. But considering that Starfleet Academy will have fewer episodes in its total run than TNG had for only two seasons, it’s important for fans and showrunners alike to realize that this new show is rapidly running out of time to win over new audiences. 


source

Continue Reading