Entertainment
How to watch Drop: Catch the Blumhouse popcorn thriller at home
Table of Contents
One of the most anticipated movies out of SXSW this spring, Drop is the latest from filmmaker Christopher Landon (Happy Death Day) and Blumhouse (M3GAN, Five Nights at Freddy’s). Dubbed “solidly fun” and “a great date night movie” by Mashable’s Film Editor, it’s a popcorn thriller with some depth. It features The White Lotus star Meghann Fahy as its leading lady, alongside Brandon Sklenar (It Ends With Us), who are “a demented pleasure to watch.”
If you missed it in theaters, you can now get in on the action at home. Here’s everything you need to know about how to watch Drop.
What is Drop about?
Written by Jillian Jacobs and Chris Roach, Drop follows widowed mother Violet (Fahy) as she gets back on the dating scene. On her first date in years, she starts receiving anonymous airdropped threats on her phone that put her son (Jacob Robinson) and babysitting sister (Violett Beane) at risk. As it turns out, a masked intruder is in her house and monitoring her every move. The only way she can save her family is by killing her date.
Check out the official trailer:
Is Drop worth watching?
Despite a less-than-excellent opening weekend, debuting in fifth place at the box office — behind A Minecraft Movie, The King of Kings, The Amateur, and Warfare — Drop has already earned more than double its $11 million budget since its release. Earning $27.7 million worldwide to date, that’s a pretty good sign for a low-budget horror. Critics and audiences both have been loving it to boot. Drop currently holds an 84 percent critic rating and 79 percent audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes — a pretty impressive feat for a popcorn thriller.
“Jacobs and Roach’s script is so full of twists that while you may see some coming, others will undoubtedly catch you by sweet surprise. Whether relishing in the situational comedy of an awkward first date or combatting mysterious and malevolent forces, Drop‘s characters are a demented pleasure to watch,” Puchko writes in her review. “All of these successes mean that Drop is charming enough to make up for its biggest flaw. In the climax, when the plot takes a big swing with a dubious but pivotal kill, you might well eye-roll over the unlikelihood of such a demise, but you won’t get the ick.“
How to watch Drop at home

Credit: Universal Pictures
It’s time for audiences to show up for Drop from their couches. There are a couple ways to watch at the time of writing — and the streaming debut will expand your options at a later date. See the details below.
Buy or rent it on digital
Drop made its at-home debut on major digital platforms (Prime Video, Apple TV, etc.) on April 29, 2025. The film is available to buy for $24.99 or rent for $19.99. While it’s certainly tempting to save a few bucks and opt for the rental option, just be aware that you’ll only get 30 days to watch the film and just 48 hours to finish it once you start. If you choose to buy it instead, then it’s yours to keep.
Here are some quick links to rent or purchase Drop:
Stream it on Peacock
While Universal has yet to announce when Drop will make its streaming debut, we know that as a Universal Pictures film, it’ll premiere on Peacock. Based on the digital-to-streaming trajectory of previous Universal movies, it will most likely hit Peacock between the end of June and the end of July. Blumhouse’s other recent horror flick, Wolf Man, and fellow Universal horror hit, Abigail, started streaming about two months after their digital debut, while other Universal films like Fall Guy and Twisters had a longer window of three months or so.
Don’t have a Peacock subscription? You can sign up for as low as $7.99 per month with ads or $13.99 per month without. But before you get ahead of yourself, be sure to check out the best ways to save some money on a subscription below.
The best Peacock streaming deals
Best Peacock deal: Save 17% on an annual subscription
The best Peacock deal on any given day is the annual subscription deal. You’ll get 12 months of streaming for the price of 10 if you pay for a year upfront. The annual Peacock subscriptions cost just $79.99 per year with ads (which breaks down to about $6.67 per month) or $139.99 per year without ads (which breaks down to about $11.67 per month). That’s about 17% in total savings.
Best Peacock deal for Xfinity customers: free Peacock Premium for eligible accounts
Are you an Xfinity customer? Be sure to check the eligibility details below, as you might be able to score a Peacock Premium subscription for free. Here’s a breakdown of who is eligible for the deal or you can head to Xfinity.com for more details.
-
Xfinity Internet users on the Gigabit or Gigabit+ plans can get Peacock Premium (with ads) for two years (offer ends June 25, 2025) for free.
-
Xfinity Internet customers who are Diamond or Platinum Xfinity Rewards members can get Peacock Premium for free by redeeming a reward for it. Sign in at xfinity.com/rewards and choose Peacock as a reward. Then, wait for your email (it may take a few hours) with instructions on activating the offer.
-
NOW TV customers can also receive Peacock Premium as part of their service.
-
New customers with Xfinity Internet and an X1 TV Box, Flex streaming TV Box, or a Xumo Stream Box from Xfinity can get Peacock Premium for free for six months.
Best Peacock deal for students: Save $5/month for one year
Students can get an entire year of Peacock Premium at a discounted rate of $2.99 per month instead of $7.99. That’s a total of just $35.88 for the year. You’ll have to verify your student status via SheerID to get the unique promo code that will unlock the savings. Just note that it can only be used once, and after the promo year is up, you’ll be charged full price again.
Mashable Deals
Best Peacock deal for first responders: Save $4/month
First responders and medical professionals are also able to score a Peacock Premium subscription at a discounted rate. Just verify your first responder or medical professional status via SheerID, and you’ll get a unique promo code that will drop the cost of a subscription from $7.99 per month to just $3.99. If you continue to meet verification qualifications, you can renew the deal each year — although you may have to go through the verification process each time and receive a new promo code. Learn more about eligibility terms and requirements.
Best for active military and veterans: Save $4/month
Active duty U.S. military service members, Reservists, National Guard members, veterans, or U.S. military retirees can also score a Peacock Premium subscription for a discounted rate of $3.99 per month instead of the usual $7.99 per month. You’ll have to prove your military status using SheerID and retrieve a promotional code to activate the offer. Eligible military personnel who continue to meet requirements can redeem the deal annually.
Best for teachers: Save $4/month for one year
Teachers can get in on the savings as well. For one year, educators who can verify their status on SheerID can get Peacock Premium for just $3.99 per month. However, once the promotional period ends, you’ll be charged full price. Be sure to cancel before the year ends.
Best for Instacart users: free Peacock Premium for Instacart+ subscribers
If you sign up for Instacart+ for $99.99 per year, you’ll unlock a free Peacock Premium subscription. And that’s on top of free grocery delivery, lower fees, and credit back on eligible pickup orders. That’s a $79.99 per year value tacked on to your Instacart+ subscription for free. Not to mention, if you’re new to Instacart+, you’ll get a free two-week trial to test the waters. If you wait until the streaming release of Drop, you could even watch it for free during the trial period.
Best for JetBlue members: free Peacock Premium for one year for Mosaic status members
If you’re a JetBlue TrueBlue Mosaic status member, you can get your first year of Peacock Premium for free through July 2025 (a $79.99 value). If you don’t have Mosaic status, you can earn 1,000 free TrueBlue points when you sign up for Peacock. Learn more about eligibility and terms over on Peacock’s special offer page.
Entertainment
The moments that defined the 2026 World Cup
Every four years, the World Cup reminds us why we fall in love with sports in the first place.
The 2026 tournament was one of firsts. For the first time, three countries — Canada, Mexico, and the United States — shared hosting duties. For the first time, the field expanded from 32 to 48 teams, giving more nations a chance to compete on the sport’s biggest stage and more federations the opportunity to showcase their depth.
That expansion brought historic debuts for Cape Verde, Jordan, Curaçao, and Uzbekistan. Their first appearances delivered some of the tournament’s most unforgettable moments.
It also felt like a farewell tour. Cristiano Ronaldo. Lionel Messi. Luka Modrić. Neymar. Son Heung-min. Guillermo Ochoa. A generation that shaped the sport for two decades took one last bow on the biggest stage, with several likely making their final World Cup appearances.
Taken together, those storylines made this World Cup feel bigger than any single match. Over the course of several weeks, the tournament gave us unforgettable goals, shocking upsets, viral celebrations, heartbreaking exits, and moments that transcended soccer altogether. Here are the moments that defined the 2026 World Cup.
Vozinha and the Blue Sharks
The best feel-good story of the World Cup has to be Cape Verde’s historic run and their goalkeeper, Vozinha (née Josimar José Évora Dias). The 40-year-old keeper and Cape Verde stalwart rocketed to international fame after a heroic performance against eventual champions Spain, keeping a clean sheet against the European giants to earn the 500,000-strong nation its first-ever points in a World Cup.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Vozinha, who was on the verge of retirement from club football, blew up on social media, amassing 29 million Instagram followers to become one of the most-followed soccer players on the platform.
The magic kept coming for the Blue Sharks. A 2-2 draw with Uruguay and a scoreless draw against Saudi Arabia secured a second-place finish in their group behind Spain, and a spot in the knockouts. There, the smallest nation ever to reach a World Cup knockout round took defending champs Argentina to the brink, including a spectacular extra-time equalizer from Sidney Lopes Cabral. It wasn’t enough — an own goal in the 111th minute gave Argentina the lead, and the win.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Even in defeat, Cape Verde and Vozinha became the darlings of the 2026 World Cup, earning a hero’s welcome when they returned home to Praia, the nation’s capital.
America’s World Cup ends in disappointment and controversy
The U.S.’s lowest moment in the tournament came wrapped in controversy. Folarin Balogun was sent off in the round of 32 against Bosnia-Herzegovina for a tackle that injured Tarik Muharemovic — a red card overturned on review, then reinstated by VAR, that should have kept him out of the quarterfinal against Belgium.
Instead, on the eve of that match, news broke that President Trump had personally called FIFA president Gianni Infantino about the suspension, and FIFA’s disciplinary committee — invoking the same conveniently vague rule it used to keep Cristiano Ronaldo eligible for his final World Cup — cleared Balogun to play.
FIFA denied any connection to the call, but the optics were brutal regardless: the first in-tournament suspension reversal FIFA had made since 1962. Balogun’s actual impact on the game was negligible — one good chance in the 82nd minute that Thibaut Courtois saved — and the U.S. lost 4-1, undone far more by sloppy defending than by anything happening off the pitch. But the timing made it impossible to separate the two.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
A team that had looked loose and confident through the group stage and into the knockout rounds showed up tight and rattled.
Insane Third Place game ends Golden Boot race
The World Cup is known for its magnificent scorers: Pelé, Maradona, Klose. It’s rare to see one player absolutely rake in the goals in a single tournament, but 2026 delivered a real fight for the crown. Heading into the final weekend, Messi and Mbappé sat tied atop the table at eight goals each, having both already passed Miroslav Klose on the World Cup’s all-time scoring list along the way. Behind them, England’s Jude Bellingham and Harry Kane lingered at six apiece, two goals back but not out of it.
Then the third-place game happened, and it blew the race open. England beat France 6-4 in a match that had no business being that entertaining for a game “nobody wanted to play.”
Mashable Trend Report
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Instead, it turned into an old-fashioned track meet. Mbappé found the net twice to push his tally to 10, breaking the tie with Messi outright and matching the mark he set back in 2022. Bellingham, meanwhile, kept crashing the box the way he had all tournament and picked up his seventh, cutting the gap to Mbappé to three with only the final left. With that crazy game over, and Spain’s 1-0 win over Argentina, Mbappé ended the tournament as the Golden Boot winner.
The last time this fixture featured multiple Golden Boot winners padding their totals was in 1990, and even that wasn’t a shootout like this one. Between Mbappé and Messi, both represent the first 8+ goal scorers since Gerd Müller scored 10 back in 1970.
We truly are blessed.
International fans experience American baseball
One of the best things about the World Cup is when international fans and players come to town and immerse themselves in local culture. The best subplot from this year’s World Cup was undoubtedly taking place at the ballpark.
With days off between fixtures, traveling World Cup fans started showing up in force at MLB games, and stadiums across the country turned into unlikely satellite fan zones. It kicked off on June 14 at Fenway, when Scottish fans fresh off a win over Haiti marched from downtown Boston straight into a Red Sox game — timed, by pure coincidence, with the ballpark’s own Scottish Heritage Night.
Two days later, the Tartan Army (the nickname for the Scottish supporters) packed part of the upper deck at Yankee Stadium, and by June 22, roughly 8,000 of them turned up in Miami for a Marlins-Rangers game, making up nearly half the announced crowd.
Norway’s supporters did their own version of the takeover at Citi Field on June 24, filling the outfield seats in Viking helmets and getting the stadium’s mascots to join their signature rowing celebration. Even England manager Thomas Tuchel, a generally terse-looking man, threw out a ceremonial first pitch at Kauffman Stadium during the team’s stay in Kansas City. He could definitely strike out Timothée Chalamet in three pitches.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
U.S. visa entry nightmare
For all the goodwill the tournament generated, the road to it exposed something uglier. In the run-up to the World Cup, visa denials and delays became a recurring headache for teams, and in some cases, outright barred people from the competition entirely.
Swiss forward Breel Embolo was blocked from boarding a flight to his own team’s training camp over a year-old conviction that had already been settled back home. South Africa’s delegation nearly missed its trip to Mexico when more than 20 players and staff got stuck waiting on visas, and Iran’s team ended up sleeping in Mexico every night of the tournament after U.S. officials barred its players and staff from overnight stays, with more than a dozen federation staffers, including the federation’s own president, never cleared to travel at all.
None of this happened by accident. It was the Trump administration’s own immigration architecture doing exactly what it was built to do, and the tournament exposed it long before the opening whistle.
The policy wasn’t limited to a handful of unlucky cases: 39 countries entered the tournament under some form of U.S. travel restriction, and for 19 of them the State Department had stopped issuing visas altogether, a list that happened to include four World Cup nations (Iran, Haiti, Côte d’Ivoire, and Senegal).
Somali referee Omar Artan, freshly named his continent’s top official and set to become the first Somali to work a World Cup match, was detained for eleven hours at Miami International Airport and sent back to Istanbul over alleged “associations with suspected members of terror organizations” that CBP officials declined to specify.
To be fair, Canada has also been just as strict, with Ghanaian fans getting an 11 percent approval rate for visas to the country. Most notably, Ghanaian player Thomas Partey had his visa and subsequent appeal denied and missed Ghana’s World Cup opener due to ongoing criminal proceedings in the UK. Partey, however, was allowed to play in the team’s other group-stage matches in the US.
Through all of this, FIFA, the one body with standing to push back, chose instead to call it a host country’s prerogative.
The world falls in love with Erling Haaland
The most terrifying striker in the world seems to be a completely normal guy. It’s something only Erling Haaland seems to be able to do, with the ruthlessly efficient Norwegian striker netting himself into the Golden Boot conversation alongside Messi and Mbappé.
Off the field, though, the man nicknamed “The Terminator” is a glorified Snapchat shitposter.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
On his personal Snapchat, you can find selfies with Shrek, face filters, and a bit where he wanders around Manhattan in a cap pretending nobody recognizes him. Despite being two years younger than fellow Gen Z superstar Mbappé, the Manchester City striker doesn’t seem to carry the same weight of expectations as his world soccer compatriots. This man is doing photoshoots with cowboy hats and wearing shirts that say “y’all can kiss my Dallas.”
It’s probably why the world can’t get enough of him.
Estadio Azteca
The Estadio Azteca, the home of Mexican soccer, delivered one of the most breathtaking scenes in this World Cup.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
The stadium is a historic site not just in Mexico but also in World Cup history. It also made for some great memes. Mexico hosted the World Cup for the third time and, for the first time ever, won all three group-stage games. The vibes coming off El Tri and its fans were at an all-time high — probably the only thing higher than the altitude at Estadio Azteca, which became a running joke all tournament long.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Entertainment
Everything we expect from Samsung’s July event (Fold 8, watches, and glasses!)
Samsung’s next big event could reveal foldables, smartwatches, and its first Android XR glasses.
on
The biggest stories of the day delivered to your inbox.
Thanks for signing up. See you at your inbox!
Entertainment
AI just disproved a major math problem. A mathematician explains.
While the rest of the world was watching the World Cup on Sunday evening, mathematician Levent Alpöge casually announced on X that he had used Anthropic’s Fable 5 to disprove the Jacobian conjecture.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
The Jacobian conjecture is a long-standing open problem in algebraic geometry that’s bedeviled highly accomplished mathematicians for almost 90 years. It was included in “Smale’s problems,” a list of unresolved math problems put forward by mathematician Stephen Smale in 1998.
But that proved no obstacle for Fable 5, Anthropic’s latest frontier AI model. (You may remember Fable 5 as the public version of Claude Mythos Preview, the AI model that Anthropic says has such advanced cybersecurity capabilities that it was too dangerous for public release.)
Alpöge is part of Harvard’s Society of Fellows, and his Linkedin profile notes an affiliation with Anthropic. We’ve reached out to Anthropic with questions about Alpöge’s work.
Meanwhile, for those of us who don’t understand polynomial functions from n-dimensional space, the question is: Does this represent a major breakthrough in artificial intelligence, or mathematics, or neither?
“This did not cause me to update my priors about what AI can and can’t do,” professor and mathematician Andrew Blumberg told Mashable. “This is exactly the kind of thing I would expect AI to be able to do. If there was a counterexample that was concise and easy to state that people haven’t found because it’s a pain to search through all this stuff, AI will find it.”
Blumberg, who has a joint appointment in mathematics and computer science at Columbia University, is involved in the First Proof project, an effort to test the capabilities of frontier large language models in solving research-level mathematics. So, it’s safe to say he understands mathematics and AI better than most of us.
Mashable Light Speed
‘You want to learn something from the answer’
Providing a counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture is still a significant achievement for AI in mathematics, Blumberg notes. But he also says there’s a big difference between providing a positive proof for a major math problem and providing a single counterexample that disproves it. Here’s the metaphor Blumberg used to explain.
“Suppose that Moses came down from the mountain with tablets, and on the tablet was written, ‘Cancer can be cured.’ Would you care? You don’t just want the answer to the question. You want to learn something from the answer. And the reason Smale thought this problem was important is because he thought that if we solved it, we would understand more things about the about the way nature is structured.”
In other words, Blumberg says, “this counterexample tells us essentially nothing. It’s just, you know, there are a lot of polynomials, and it’s hard for people to check them all, but it’s not hard for machines.”
The Jacobian conjecture isn’t the only math problem AI has tackled in recent months. OpenAI announced in May an “internal model” had disproved the Erdős unit distance conjecture, a central conjecture in discrete geometry.
However, in that case, the result was more productive, Blumberg says. That’s because OpenAI didn’t just provide a counterexample — but a disproof of the problem itself.
“The disproof there already has led to interesting things because experts in the area unpacked what was going on in the disproof and then used it to do other things,” Blumberg says.
And that’s not necessarily the case with the Jacobian conjecture counterexample, he adds — while conceding he’s not expert enough to see if there’s something special about the structure of the counterexample that we can learn from. “But it’s not in and of itself interesting.”
Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable’s parent company, in April 2025 filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.
