Entertainment
Hinge tests facial recognition scans in these countries
The dating app Hinge is testing the facial recognition feature Face Check in a number of countries this quarter. That’s according to its parent company, Match Group, which announced the test during its 2025 Q4 earnings call.
Tinder has required Face Check for all new U.S. users since October 2025, after making it mandatory for California users. By the end of this first quarter in 2026, Match Group expects Tinder to launch Face Check globally.
Where it has been rolled out, the company claims the face-checking feature has led to a more than 50 percent reduction in interactions with bad actors (accounts that engage in deceptive or harmful behaviors like spam and scam attempts).
Hinge says it will test the feature in Mexico, Brazil, Australia, and Canada this quarter. More details about the U.S. rollout of Face Check are coming soon, with testing beginning as early as next month, a spokesperson told Mashable.
Mashable Trend Report
Hinge is also preparing to test Direct to Date, “which clarifies intent to accelerate IRL plans,” according to the Q4 2025 prepared remarks.
Hinge told Mashable that the app is exploring a new way to help daters start planning for a first date as soon as they match — including sharing their availability, as well as date activities they’re interested in. The test is planned for this spring.
Hinge continues to be the darling of Match Group’s array of apps, as shown by the Q4 results. Paying users and direct revenue increased again quarterly and yearly, while Tinder’s have decreased.
In December, Hinge founder Justin McLeod announced he was leaving Hinge to launch an AI dating service, which has yet to be unveiled.
Entertainment
Unrated Slacker Comedy Is This Generation’s Office Space
By Robert Scucci
| Published

No matter where you’re from, you probably grew up with somebody like Marty (Joshua Burge) from 2014’s Buzzard. While you went to college or joined the workforce, or at the very least tried to make something of yourself, Marty wants nothing to do with the rat race. The problem is he’s not smart enough to scrape by without resorting to criminal activity. He’s the kind of guy who would stage a slip and fall at a fast food restaurant just to get a $500 payout three years later, thinking he stuck it to the man and came out on top.
Buzzard explores this behavior to the extreme, one scam, pizza coupon, and Nintendo controller at a time. It’s the ultimate slacker comedy because Marty cares about self-preservation just enough to stay out of serious trouble, but not enough to stop himself from constantly getting hoisted by his own petard. It’s Office Space for the disenfranchised Millennial. It’s a slacker comedy with a nihilistic bent. It’s the $20 plate of hotel spaghetti that keeps you going until you can find more Mountain Dew to sustain yourself.
It’s Always A Party With Marty

Buzzard, like most films written and directed by Joel Potrykus and starring Joshua Burge, centers on Marty, an office temp at a mortgage company who’s always looking for the next scheme to help him coast through life. He lives off frozen pizzas he gets at a discount by calling customer service to complain after every meal, scoring coupons in return. He steals toner, staplers, telephones, and keyboards from the company dumpster and returns them to office supply stores for cash. He opens bank accounts for the free $50 deposit, withdraws the funds, and then does it again. It’s not beneath him to cut his hand at home, show up to work, and stage an accident with the paper slicer so he can file a worker’s comp claim.
Marty decides to ante up when he realizes he can steal customer refund checks, sign them over to himself, and cash them at the bank. Never thinking about the consequences, he quickly learns the company receives monthly check-cashing reports, complete with images of the checks and the accounts they were deposited into.

Fearing he’s about to get caught red-handed, Marty lays low at his friend and coworker Derek’s (Joel Potrykus) house while trying to figure out his next move. If you haven’t noticed by now, planning ahead is not Marty’s strong suit. For reasons never explained, he modifies an old Nintendo Power Glove with steak knives, a la Freddy Kreuger, and carries it with him everywhere. Just in case.
The rest of the movie plays out exactly how you’d expect. Marty tries cashing checks, but every bank flags his account. He tries breaking into a motel to sleep for free and immediately gets caught. He burns through the last of his money with no backup plan other than continuing to live exactly how he wants. The problem is he’s running out of options, and his increasingly sloppy crimes are catching up to him.
Marty Will Never Learn

What’s most fascinating about Buzzard is how deeply the slacker DNA is embedded in Marty. No matter what happens, he finds a way out of a jam, and he doesn’t care how pathetic it makes him look. When called out for his “worksite injury,” he shrugs and waits for it to blow over while the doctor stares him down, clearly not buying it. When he’s finally backed into a corner where the authorities might get involved, he busts out the Power Glove in a desperate attempt to fend off his problems. When he spends his last $20 on hotel spaghetti, he shovels it down without a single thought about where his next meal will come from.
Marty is every slacker you’ve ever met, all rolled into one composite character. He’s impulsive, repulsive, and never sympathetic. But that’s also what makes Buzzard so much fun to watch, because you end up rooting for him anyway. He’s screwing the system every chance he gets, or so he thinks, and part of you wants to live vicariously through that because he genuinely does not give a single sh*t. It’s almost inspiring how little he cares about anything, whether it’s his friendships, job security, or reputation. None of it matters to Marty.

It’s the kind of personality you envy in small doses, if only because you know you could never carry yourself with that level of nonchalance while still functioning as a productive member of society.
Consequences Be Damned
Half the fun of watching Buzzard is wondering when Marty’s run will finally end, and how many people he’d be willing to drag down with him if it means squeezing out one more free Party Pizza before getting hauled off to jail, flipping his boss the bird on the way out. Even if he does face consequences, you get the sense he’ll find a way to keep scamming his way through life.

That’s what makes Buzzard so compelling. Marty puts more effort into avoiding responsibility than it would take to just show up, do the bare minimum, and live comfortably. That’s the real irony, because everything he does looks exhausting.

As of this writing, Buzzard is streaming for free on Tubi.

Entertainment
The Forgotten Buffy Episode That Secretly Endorsed Communism
By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

Buffy the Vampire Slayer is, for the most part, a generally apolitical show. Obviously, there are embedded messages about the importance of feminism and accepting others who may be different (like being gay, being a witch, or being a gay witch). Some might consider those “woke” messages, but the show was simply emphasizing the importance of treating everyone equally. However, one memorable episode might have taken the idea of equality a little too far. You see, the climax of Season 3’s opening episode, “Anne,” actually endorsed Communism!
For some context, “Anne” was the first Buffy the Vampire Slayer episode of Season 3, and it continued from the previous season’s fairly startling cliffhanger, “Becoming.” In the Season 2 finale, Buffy killed Angel, who had turned evil. In doing so, she managed to save the entire world from getting sucked into Hell. However, at the last minute, Angel’s soul was restored, forcing Buffy to kill the man she loved to save all of humanity. As if that wasn’t bad enough, she previously got an ultimatum from her mother to never return home if she walked out the front door. Accordingly, Buffy packed her things and secretly moved out at the end of the episode.
A New Life In The City Of Angels

“Anne” continues Buffy’s story, revealing that she is now living in Los Angeles and working as a waitress. She just wants to lead a normal life, but she discovers a supernatural plot where a demon is forcing humans into hard labor at his evil factory. Buffy saves the day, of course, killing the demon and helping to free all of his captives. Realizing that she just can’t escape her calling as a Slayer, she returns home to Sunnydale, where she is reunited with her very worried mother.
Generally speaking, fans really like “Anne,” an episode that takes Buffy out of her comfort zone and even plants the seeds for the eventual Angel spinoff. However, most of this episode’s biggest fans miss Buffy’s not-so-subtle endorsement of Communism. You see, when she is fighting some of the demon’s sidekicks, the most prominent weapon she uses is a hammer and sickle!
It’s Hammer Time

The hammer and sickle is, of course, the famous symbol of the Soviet Union. These tools symbolically represent Communism because they show the workers and peasants unifying themselves against common enemies. Those enemies nominally include those who would try to take power and make themselves superior to others. In this way, there is also a threat embedded in this symbol. Namely, that when someone tries to oppress others, workers and peasants will unite to overthrow their usurpers.
Believe it or not, the climax of “Anne” really emphasizes this. On top of Buffy wielding a hammer and sickle (the latter of which she stole from a bad guy), she fights in a factory where a demon has uncharacteristically forced humans into hard labor. It’s not entirely clear what the purpose of the factory is, but it’s very obvious that the demon has tried to seize the means of production from the workers (a big no-no in Communism). Buffy even gets the workers to chip in, and they all work together to escape. Uniting the workers and peasants together to fight a demonic capitalist? In this case, both Giles and Stalin would be proud!

Obviously, Buffy the Vampire Slayer didn’t become an openly Communist show after this, and the inclusion of a hammer and sickle in “Anne” was likely nothing more than a glorified Easter egg. But it’s undeniably fun to see our protagonist become a hero of the people, openly leading helpless workers in a revolt against the literal boss from Hell. Speaking of bosses, “Anne” offers some gallows hope to anyone who hates their job. At least your employer is only sucking out your soul metaphorically rather than literally.
Entertainment
Raunchy, R-Rated Comedy Finds Purpose Where You Least Expect It
By Robert Scucci
| Published

There’s no problem in life that can’t be solved by an epic rant because it’s the best way to lay all your thoughts out on the table and properly dissect them. In 2025’s Is This Thing On?, these rants come in the form of an amateur stand-up set as a man tries to navigate his upcoming divorce. What starts as a completely impulsive move turns into a lifeline for Will Arnett’s Alex Novak, who doesn’t necessarily want to move on without his wife and kids, but doesn’t yet know how to accept this phase of his life.
A comedy drama with an extra emphasis on comedy, Is This Thing On? is a feel-good story about falling out of love, coping with the loss, and picking up the pieces in unexpected ways. If I have any criticism of the film, it’s that it’s just a little too convenient, and the stakes, all things considered, are considerably low for the kind of point it’s trying to get across. The concept, which is loosely based on English comedian John Bishop’s life, is fun, and it’s a light watch. It’s a great movie about second chances, and sometimes that’s all you really need after a particularly tumultuous week on the home front.
From Bachelor Pad To Comedy Club

Is This Thing On? doesn’t have much going on at a narrative level, but its character arcs are still satisfying. Amicably separated from his wife of 20 odd years, Tess (Laura Dern), Alex Novak (Will Arnett) feels lost post-marriage. Their divorce wasn’t rancorous, and they still run in the same social circles. They live separately, but share custody of their two kids, Felix (Blake Kane) and Jude (Calvin Knegten). By all measures, this is the healthiest way to approach divorce, but it’s obvious that the separation is gnawing away at both Alex and Tess, who no longer feel like a couple but still show up for each other every day.
After eating a pot cookie with Tess and accidentally getting separated at the train station, Alex walks into a comedy club. Not having any cash on hand, he signs up for an open mic to get out of paying the cover charge, and something awakens in him that night. He goes on stage and kills it, finding the sense of purpose outside of his white-collar job and family life that he’s been desperately craving.

It doesn’t take long for him to become an open mic regular, and eventually a featured act, unbeknownst to his family, which is probably for the better. Since most of his jokes are about his failed marriage, it’s a good thing that Tess doesn’t hear his rants. That is, until she shows up at a comedy club by sheer coincidence and sees him in action.
From this point forward in Is This Thing On?, Alex and Tess decide to give their relationship a second chance, learning the real reason their marriage failed now that they’ve had some time apart. It’s not like everything gets fixed overnight, but they still have feelings for each other, even if they don’t quite know how to move forward at this point in their lives.
When A Feel-Good Movie Feels Too Good

A total feel-good movie through and through, Is This Thing On? is about more than life after divorce and one man’s attempt to pick up the pieces. By all measures, Alex is killing it. He’s showing up for his family in ways he neglected in the past, and his comedy hobby puts a bounce in his step. His new lease on life is immediately noticed by the woman who no longer wanted to be with him, but decides that she does upon realizing that she could also be chasing her dreams of being an Olympic volleyball coach while supporting him with his.
The problem with this dynamic, however, is that it doesn’t feel plausible, even if it’s inspired by a true story. Too many critical changes happen too quickly, making the whole thing play out like a Lifetime movie, which is unfortunate because with a little more drama and tension, this could have been a perfect movie. It explores themes that a lot of married couples struggle with, but its “conflict” is borderline nonexistent.

For what it’s worth, though, it’s a nice movie about finding a new purpose in life well into adulthood, when you should be set in your ways, and that’s really all it needs to be. I’m not buying how clean everything resolves here, but if these things happened in my life, it’s probably how I’d want them to play out.

As of this writing, Is This Thing On? is streaming on Hulu.
