Connect with us

Entertainment

Bruce Campbell's Forgotten, R-Rated 90s Thriller Is Pure Cult Paranoia

By Robert Scucci
| Published

The beauty of Bruce Campbell and Sam Raimi produced films is that you always know what you’re getting into. You get weird characters thrust into even weirder situations, and you have to rely on their charm to carry you through whatever chaotic premise the screenplay lays out. More often than not, outings from this era, like 1991’s Lunatics: A Love Story, are extremely low budget, low brow, and high concept, and you just have to roll with it.

Written and directed by Josh Becker, and starring Ted Raimi and Deborah Foreman, Lunatics: A Love Story centers on agoraphobic machinations, giant spider monsters, call girl hotlines, and misguided romance. Set almost entirely inside a run-down Los Angeles apartment wrapped in tin foil, we catch a glimpse of just how far one man’s mind can spiral when he needs companionship the most, resulting in romantic exchanges that are baffling to say the least.

The Dangers That Await Outside

Lunatics: A Love Story, despite its 87-minute runtime, takes a while to get going. We’re first introduced to Hank (Ted Raimi), a recluse who hasn’t left his apartment in over six months. His neighbors have never seen him, and the mail carrier who stops by daily is irritated because he never comes downstairs to collect his correspondence. The inside of Hank’s apartment looks exactly how you’d expect. His door has multiple locks, and his walls are wrapped in foil.

Though we don’t know the exact reason Hank has become so isolated, it’s established early on that he has nightmares about spiders crawling on his brain, and a masked doctor (portrayed by Bruce Campbell) chasing him with comically large needles filled with mysterious fluids.

Lunatics: A Love Story 1991

Meanwhile, across town, Nancy (Deborah Foreman) faces her own obstacles. She’s dumped by her boyfriend Ray (also Bruce Campbell) and kicked out of the hotel she’s staying at after he steals her money on his way out, leaving her unable to pay for the room. While wandering the streets, she’s attacked by a group of thugs and seeks refuge in a nearby payphone at the exact same time Hank is dialing out to call a sex hotline.

By sheer coincidence, or maybe something cosmic is at play, the payphone rings when Hank dials, and Nancy picks it up. He invites her to his apartment because he needs company. Up until this point, he’s been hallucinating rappers who forcibly scratch beats on his turntable using his face, and intruders trying to breach his front door with a bone saw.

Lunatics: A Love Story 1991

When Nancy takes Hank up on his offer, they finally sit down and talk through their problems, both terrified of the horrors, real and imagined, that await them outside.

One Glaring Problem 

It goes without saying that any fan of Bruce Campbell and the Raimi brothers’ unhinged style of filmmaking will enjoy the creature design and schlocky special effects that Lunatics: A Love Story has to offer. There’s always a manic charm you can get behind if you know what you’re signing up for, and this film is no exception.

Lunatics: A Love Story 1991

Narratively speaking, though, the film falls apart for one specific reason. It takes nearly 40 minutes for our two protagonists to cross paths, meaning there’s very little time for them to establish trust, become friends, and hit things off in a believable way. Given just how unhinged Hank is at the beginning of the film, it’s wildly improbable that somebody like Nancy would not only enter his apartment, but stick around for more than five minutes given how uncomfortable the setting is.

Then again, I’m not seeking out movies like Lunatics: A Love Story for a tight screenplay that makes logical sense. I seek out movies like this because I want to watch somebody go off the deep end while whoever gets dragged into his chaotic life by happenstance tries to make sense of everything. If that’s what you’re looking for, you’ll have a great time watching Hank finally suit up in his tin foil armor and make his way into the Los Angeles streets, where he hallucinates giant spiders, encounters the gang members tormenting Nancy, and completely loses his mind in the process.

Lunatics: A Love Story 1991

All the elements of an insane, low-budget Raimi and Campbell production are here, and writer-director Josh Becker couldn’t have asked for a better team to help realize his vision, as bootstrapped as it may be. What you get is a fun, quick trip into the mind of a deeply unstable man searching for a romantic partner in his increasingly closed-off life, and it works shockingly well within that framework.

To witness all of the low-budget, genre-bending charm that Lunatics: A Love Story has to offer, you can stream the title for free on Tubi as of this writing.


source

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

This tiny $22 cable could replace your whole charging setup

TL;DR: Avoid the dreaded low-battery alert on your devices with this GoCable 8-in-1 EDC 100W Cable, now just $21.99 (reg. $49.99).


$21.99

$49.99
Save $28.00

 

Sick of keeping up with all the chargers your devices require? From what seems like constantly changing iPhones chargers to requiring a different type for your iPad and laptop, it can feel like a full-time job keeping up with your charging cables. That’s where GoCable comes in, offering an 8-in-1 keyring cable you can take along anywhere.

Right now, you can score a GoCable 8-in-1 EDC 100W Cable for just $21.99 (reg. $49.99).

Mashable Deals

By signing up, you agree to receive recurring automated SMS marketing messages from Mashable Deals at the number provided. Msg and data rates may apply. Up to 2 messages/day. Reply STOP to opt out, HELP for help. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Whether you’re heading on vacation or just trying to stay powered up on a workday, this GoCable 8-in-1 EDC 100W Cable is ready to simplify how you keep your devices charged. This convenient gadget combines eight essential features into one sleek design that you can bring along anywhere.

Packed with 100W ultra-fast charging, the GoCable makes it speedy and simple to supercharge your device efficiently — from laptops to smartphones and everything in between. It also offers high-speed file transfer capabilities. All you need to add is a power bank or wall adapter, and it’s ready to work with everything from Type-C and Type-C+ to Apple Lightning connectors.

If you’re curious about a device’s charging status, an LED power display provides real-time status information. The magnetic cable also ensures you don’t have to deal with annoying tangled cables; just toss it in a bag and rest easy knowing it will be mess-free.

Aside from keeping devices powered up efficiently, the GoCable includes hidden tools for extra convenience. You’ll have quick access to a bottle opener and a hidden cutter for opening packages safely. The included carabiner clip lets you attach this to bags or belts in seconds, so you can always keep it within arm’s reach.

Get this GoCable 8-in-1 EDC 100W Cable for only $21.99 (reg. $49.99).

StackSocial prices subject to change.

source

Continue Reading

Entertainment

How Resident Evil Survived Itself

For decades, Resident Evil has constantly reinvented itself. From fixed-camera survival horror to explosive co-op action to first-person psychological terror. At times, those reinventions pushed the franchise to the brink of losing its identity entirely. But through resets, remakes, and refinement, Capcom rediscovered what truly defined the series: structured vulnerability, spatial tension, and controlled escalation.

With Resident Evil 9, the franchise no longer feels reactive. It feels confident. In this episode of How It Hits, we break down how Resident Evil survived itself, and why it finally feels like everything has come together.

Resident Evil Requiem is now available.

source

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Trump orders Pentagon to stop using woke Anthropic in fiery Truth social post

Negotiations between the Pentagon and the AI company Anthropic were severely complicated on Friday when President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that the government would stop utilizing the company’s tech. The president ordered the Pentagon to begin a six-month phase-out, accusing Anthropic of being run by “Leftwing nut jobs.”

The Truth Social post said that Anthropic wanted the government to abide by its terms of service.

“THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS!,” Trump wrote. “That decision belongs to YOUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, and the tremendous leaders I appoint to run our Military. The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE trying to STRONG-ARM the Department of War, and force them to obey their Terms of Service instead of our Constitution.”

a screenshot of president trump's truth social post about anthropic


Credit: Screenshot courtesy of Truth Social

The federal government and Anthropic have been at odds for weeks as they tried to hammer out an agreement on how the military can use Claude, Anthropic’s AI model. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has been firm that he will not allow the Pentagon to use Claude for mass surveillance of Americans or to create autonomous weapons, like pilotless drones.

The government reportedly agreed to those terms, according to the New York Times, but the contract’s legal language provided too much wiggle room for Anthropic’s comfort. Anthropic is known for taking a more cautious approach to AI development, and its founders famously left OpenAI over AI safety concerns.

On Thursday, Amodei explained his stance in a blog post:

“Anthropic understands that the Department of War, not private companies, makes military decisions. We have never raised objections to particular military operations nor attempted to limit use of our technology in an ad hoc manner.

However, in a narrow set of cases, we believe AI can undermine, rather than defend, democratic values. Some uses are also simply outside the bounds of what today’s technology can safely and reliably do.”

A deadline of Friday evening was set for an agreement between the Pentagon and Anthropic. It’s not clear if Trump’s announcement of a phase-out will equate to more time for negotiation or if the government is truly moving forward with firing Anthropic by declaring it a supply chain risk. The government may also seek to compel Anthropic to agree to its terms through the Defense Production Act, according to the Times. The government may also choose another AI partner, like Elon Musk’s Grok, but CIA officials believe that product is inferior to Anthropic’s, the Times reports.

Following the president’s Friday afternoon announcement, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman appeared on CNBC and voiced support for Anthropic. “For all the differences I have with Anthropic, I mostly trust them as a company and I think they really do care about safety, and I’ve been happy that they’ve been supporting our war fighters,” Altman said, according to a clip of the appearance posted to X.

Meanwhile, dozens of employees at Google and OpenAI, both competitors of Anthropic, signed letters backing Amodei’s stances. And outside Anthropic’s San Francisco headquarters, words of support appeared in chalk on the sidewalk, according to a post on X.

This week, Anthropic softened its safety policy — often viewed as one of the strongest in Silicon Valley — citing competitors’ reluctance to do the same and the federal government’s disinterest in prioritizing security.

“The policy environment has shifted toward prioritizing AI competitiveness and economic growth, while safety-oriented discussions have yet to gain meaningful traction at the federal level,” the company wrote. “We remain convinced that effective government engagement on AI safety is both necessary and achievable, and we aim to continue advancing a conversation grounded in evidence, national security interests, economic competitiveness, and public trust. But this is proving to be a long-term project—not something that is happening organically as AI becomes more capable or crosses certain thresholds.”


Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable’s parent company, in April 2025 filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.


source

Continue Reading