Entertainment
Iconic Sci-fi Series Predicts This Year Will Be The End Of The World
By Chris Snellgrove
| Published
What if this year were the end of the world as you know it? That sounds like crazy talk, of course, but this is the year that has long been prophesied by one of the greatest sci-fi franchises as the beginning of World War III. That prophecy comes to us from the last IP you’d expect to predict the end of the world: Star Trek!
Obviously, Star Trek is known for its optimistic portrayal of a future where most people do not have to worry about modern concerns such as poverty, disease, and war. However, a major part of the franchise lore is that things have to get incredibly worse before they start to get better. Humanity doesn’t begin working towards its bright, shiny future until it survives World War III, a catastrophic global conflict that is supposed to start in 2026.
World War III Starts With One Man
Fittingly enough, much of our franchise knowledge of World War III comes from Star Trek: The Original Series. Classic episodes like “Bread and Circuses” and “The Savage Curtain” tell us that a man named Colonel Phillip Green was responsible for leading a bunch of ecoterrorists in attacks that ultimately claimed the lives of 37 million people. He may actually be the one responsible for causing this war, as it is mentioned in “The Savage Curtain” that he “led” a genocidal war, later identified as WWIII.
Frustratingly, The Original Series doesn’t tell us much more about Colonel Green except that he was infamous for striking his enemies in the midst of ostensibly peaceful negotiations. Later, Star Trek: Enterprise clarified that he used his troops to kill those affected with radiation sickness and other conditions that he considered “impurities.” He was worried about these traits being passed on to children, making Green an explicitly Hitler-like figure, right down to his obsession with eugenics.
And The Rockets’ Red Glare
It was the fan-favorite film Star Trek: First Contact that specified that World War III began in 2026, and the movie also put a name to one of the factions involved: the Eastern Coalition. The first episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation revealed that some of the different factions used drugs to control their soldiers. Discovery and Strange New Worlds specified that as late as 2053, nuclear bombs were being dropped on cities like Richmond, Washington, New York, and Paris.
Speaking of Strange New Worlds, that show used an interesting retcon to tie World War III with a major conflict first mentioned in The Original Series: the Eugenics Wars. During Earth’s troubled history, unethical scientists began experimenting with selective breeding and genetic editing, and their ultimate goal was to create a race of supersoldiers. Those soldiers were known as Augments, and their most famous member was Khan Noonien Singh, who would later go on to have multiple iconic fights with an equally legendary figure: Captain James T. Kirk.
A Real Khan Job
Predictably, these Augments tried to take over the world, seizing power in over 40 nations before they were ultimately overthrown by humanity. Most Augments were tried and executed as war criminals, but Khan and dozens of his followers escaped in a sleeper sheep, where they were later awoken from cryogenic stasis by Captain Kirk. In the classic episode “Space Seed,” Spock mentioned a very specific fact that Star Trek spent decades trying to run from: that the Eugenics Wars lasted from 1992-1996.
Why has Trek been running from this bit of trivia, and how does it connect to World War III? After Star Trek: The Next Generation came out in 1987, it became increasingly hard for the writers (especially after the end of the Cold War) to imagine the ‘90s as a period of major global upheaval. The best evidence of this is that in the Voyager episode where they traveled back to 1996 (“Future’s End”), and despite this being the last year of the Eugenics Wars, there is no sign that America had experienced any of the worldwide conflict that took the lives of over 30 million people.
Burned By The Retcon
Strange New Worlds addressed this matter in a very unexpected way. “Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow” revealed that the Temporal War and assorted meddling time travelers ended up affecting Khan’s personal timeline. Now, the tyrant was born later in the timeline, but his rise to power is still inevitable: in the Picard episode “Farewell,” the mad scientist Doctor Adam Soong was last seen in 2024, examining a file (from 1996, no less) titled “Project Khan.”
That would put Khan on the right track to be a major player when World War III kicks off in 2026, but how do we know for sure that he was involved? In the premiere Strange New Worlds episode (“Strange New Worlds”), Captain Pike gave a speech to a group of aliens where he mentioned how Earth’s last major global conflict had gone by different names over the years. “We called it the Second Civil War, then the Eugenics War, and finally just World War III.”
No Place On Earth Was Safe
Previously, in The Original Series episode “Space Seed,” Spock claimed (while admitting that records of the time period were “fragmentary”) that the Eugenics Wars simply took place during World War III. Now, Pike is retroactively claiming that the Eugenics Wars and World War III are considered the same conflict. However, we do know that these different names likely referred to distinct periods of time during this overall conflict.
That’s because the first name for what would be called a global conflict was “the Second Civil War;” at this point, the presentation Pike is showing to a group of aliens shows footage of the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol. Putting aside the wacky politics of this as a creative decision (is Star Trek really linking Khan and Donald Trump in official canon?!?), this gives us an approximate timeline of events. The Second Civil War starts in early 2021, the Eugenics Wars begin sometime after 2024, and World War III breaks out in 2026.
2026: The End Of The World As We Know It
Hey, that’s this year! Since Star Trek has predicted that this is the end of the world, you should probably take the time to put your affairs in order. Tell your loved ones how much they mean to you, make time for your own needs, and remove anything from your life that no longer sparks joy.
After the last episode of Starfleet Academy, that probably includes your Paramount+ subscription. Trust me: even if the world doesn’t end in apocalyptic disaster, you don’t need a streamer whose exclusives feel like every single biblical plague, all rolled into one!
Entertainment
Star Trek’s Most Hated Producer Predicted The Worst Part Of The Franchise
By Chris Snellgrove
| Published
Few Star Trek creators are quite as controversial as Rick Berman, who has been accused of everything from persistent on-set misogyny to running the franchise’s Golden Age into the ground with Enterprise and Nemesis. However, for all of his alleged faults, Berman actually predicted very early on what would become the worst part of the franchise: its overreliance on the Borg. Moreover, he implied that if Star Trek couldn’t find anything original to do with these iconic bad guys, they should simply stop being included in future stories.
Berman’s thoughts on this matter are quoted extensively in Captain’s Logs: The Unauthorized Complete Trek Voyages. He was discussing “Descent,” the two-part Star Trek: The Next Generation episode that explored what happened to the Borg after the Enterprise crew returned a Borg with a personality (Hugh) back to the Collective. The executive producer liked how the show used the villains in this ambitious episode, but he specifically enjoyed how they were written so very differently from their earlier appearances.
Star Trek’s Most Two-Dimensional Villains
“I find [the Borg] very two-dimensional in a way,” Berman said. “They are faceless characters without personality and without specific character traits.” While many fans would say this is what makes them so scary (they are basically the closest thing Star Trek has to zombies), Berman thought that their collective nature made them “sort of a one-beat group of bad guys.”
Berman did acknowledge that these “one-beat” villains could be used well in certain circumstances. For example, he noted that “In ‘Best of Both Worlds’ they represented a threat as opposed to characters, and that was a great episode.” This is a fairly astute analysis, really: being a Collective, the Borg were always going to fail at being interesting characters, but they worked astoundingly well as TNG’s first real existential threat to the Federation’s entire way of life.
Borg Of A Different “Hugh”
For Berman, the episode “I, Borg” (where a captured Borg develops a personality before being returned to the Collective) was something of a revelation. He enjoyed how this story transformed the Borg “into a character” who was “given a personality and something to be sympathetic towards.” He then made a bold statement that would prove weirdly prophetic: “My only interest in the Borg is when they’re used off-center in other than the way they were originally conceived.”
While Berman may have loved how different the Borg in “Descent” were, that sentiment wasn’t shared by most of the fandom. Many missed the cybernetic zombies that had first scared them in episodes like “The Best of Both Worlds,” finding them far more frightening than the group of angry, screaming cyborgs in “Descent.” Accordingly, Star Trek: First Contact brought the Borg back more or less as they were, with one twist: the addition of a Queen.
The Worst Of Both Worlds
Unfortunately, this ended up being “the worst of both worlds” from a creative standpoint. The Queen was (as confirmed by Brannon Braga and other Star Trek creatives) primarily added to give the Borg a recognizable figure who could both speak and be spoken to; that made for more compelling filmmaking than having characters like Picard and Data talk to the formless voice of the Collective. But the very idea of an individual queen went against the Borg’s whole deal, irking fans who wished these villains had stayed consistent.
Speaking of consistency, Star Trek never really made any major changes with the Borg as a whole after this. Sure, the Queen still popped up, but for the most part, the Borg were back to being robot zombies. As Rick Berman predicted, constantly using the Borg without making any substantive changes eventually provided diminishing storytelling returns.
Kissing The Borg Goodbye?
For example, they popped up so much in Voyager (a show that eventually added a Borg officer) that their appearances stopped feeling special. They popped up in Enterprise and, somewhat inexplicably, every single season of Star Trek: Picard. Heck, that show even made the Borg (complete with their unkillable Queen) the final Big Bad, signifying to fans that the writers had really and truly run out of ideas.
Rick Berman’s prophecy came to pass: the Borg remained one-note bad guys until the very end, never again receiving a character change as significant as what we saw in “Descent.” They were transformed back into a reliable bad guy, but one that ultimately became reliably boring. Now that the franchise has moved into the 32nd century, we can only hope the Borg never pop up in Starfleet Academy; otherwise, the iconic race might have to get several passionate lectures on the evils of cultural assimilation, punctuated by quippy phrases like “Resistance ain’t futile, bruh” and “assimilate this, b*tch!”
Can the Collective be defeated by pure, undiluted cringe? Here’s hoping we don’t have to find out!
Entertainment
The 1980s Thriller So Extreme, It Almost Didn’t Make It Past The Censors
By Robert Scucci
| Published
Most serial killer movies land firmly in the R rated category so they can see a wide theatrical release and score big with horror fans at the box office. 1986’s Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, on the other hand, was deemed so extreme when it made its early rounds through the festival circuit that it was slapped with an X rating by the MPAA despite its positive reception. While several versions of the film have circulated over the years in an effort to secure an R rating, the unrated cut is currently streaming for free on Tubi, and it’s easy to see why the censors were all over this one.
By today’s standards, the violence in Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer feels surprisingly restrained on a practical level. There are still a handful of brutally effective sequences in the second and third acts that will make your skin crawl, but it’s not necessarily the gore that risks putting you off. Much of the violence plays out like crime scene photographs taken after the fact rather than staged acts of carnage. That said, those images alone are more than enough to make you want to wash your eyeballs out with Listerine.
Based loosely on the life of real life serial killer Henry Lee Lucas, who famously claimed responsibility for hundreds of murders, and his associate Ottis Toole, Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer leans into its depravity with a level of casual confidence that’s far more unsettling than stylized cinematic violence. It’s not the crimes themselves that are most disturbing here, but the people committing them as if it were just another day at work.
Simple Story, Complex Characters
Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer wastes no time introducing its three principal characters. We first meet Henry (Michael Rooker) as he drifts from town to town, picking up hitchhikers and stopping at diners. These mundane routines are punctuated by shock cuts of the bodies he leaves behind, but we never actually see him commit the murders themselves. This approach tells you everything you need to know about Henry. He’s completely unassuming, and the contrast between his outward normalcy and the devastation he causes makes it clear how easily he blends in with society.
Meanwhile, Otis (Tom Towles), Henry’s former prison mate and current roommate, is returning from the airport with his sister Becky (Tracy Arnold), who will be staying with them for the time being. When Becky presses Henry about his past, he’s forthcoming about murdering his abusive mother, the crime that landed him in prison. Becky doesn’t immediately see Henry as a bad person because she comes from an abusive household herself and understands how desperate circumstances can push people to extreme behavior that they later regret.
As Becky searches for work and tries to get back on her feet with plans to eventually return home, Otis and Henry embark on an increasingly brutal crime spree that steadily escalates. It begins with Henry killing the call girls he and Otis are seeing, but takes a darker turn after they rob a fence and steal his video equipment. Otis quickly develops a sick fascination with filming their crimes and watching the footage back when they return home.
During this stretch, Henry lays out his philosophy for staying ahead of the law, explaining the importance of constantly changing his MO and staying on the move. As the body count rises, Otis’s lack of impulse control begins to clash with Henry’s colder, more methodical approach. Otis is reckless in a way that somehow makes Henry look almost reasonable by comparison, and that growing tension eventually puts the two men at odds.
A Total Punisher In The Best Kind Of Way
Visually and thematically, Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer is far from an easy watch. As a character study, it remains one of director John McNaughton’s most punishing and effective efforts because it refuses to pull its punches. The violence is disturbing on its own, but what lingers far longer is the sheer indifference behind it. Henry can be polite, patient, and accommodating with Becky, only to turn into a monster without warning.
That duality is the film’s most unsettling quality. One moment he’s helping Becky clean up after dinner. The next, he’s stepping out to murder a call girl with the same emotional investment you’d put into a late night gas station run for cigarettes. The lack of distinction between those two worlds is what makes the film so difficult to shake.
Boasting an 89 percent approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer is a certified fresh outing that grapples with subject matter that’s rotten to its core. Whether you can handle it is entirely up to you, but if you’re willing to find out, the unrated version is currently streaming for free on Tubi as of this writing.
Entertainment
How Star Trek’s Strongest Female Character Ruined Dr. Crusher
By Chris Snellgrove
| Published
Arguably, the strongest female character in Star Trek: The Next Generation was Dr. Beverly Crusher. Not only was she the Chief Medical Officer, but she had the same rank as Commander Riker, the Enterprise’s swaggering first officer. Given the character’s rank, it would have been perfectly plausible for her to hop in the captain’s chair and take command on a relatively regular basis. However, Dr. Crusher actor Gates McFadden recently revealed why this didn’t happen: Star Trek’s producers kept her out of the captain’s chair to make the arrival of Voyager’s Captain Janeway feel more special.
This information comes to us courtesy of Fan Expo Portland, where McFadden got very candid about her time on Star Trek: The Next Generation. She explained that the producers “knew they were going to have a female captain fairly early on.” Finishing her thoughts, she noted that “while I was put sometimes in the captain’s chair, since I had the same rank as [Will Riker], they were careful about how much they wanted to do that, because they were saving that for when Voyager happened.”
The Doctor Is In (The Chair)
The most notable example of Dr. Crusher being put in command happened during the two-part episode, “Descent.” To help search for Commander Data, Picard inexplicably sends himself, his bridge crew, and half the ship to canvas an unknown alien planet, leaving Dr. Crusher in command of the Enterprise. Her command skills are really put to the test, though, when she has to figure out how to defeat a new type of Borg vessel, which (not unlike the old vessels) is more powerful than her ship in every way.
Using a combination of scientific know-how and more than a little plot armor, Dr. Crusher takes the Enterprise into the planet’s sun. After that, she uses the ship’s phasers to trigger a solar eruption that completely destroys the Borg vessel. After seeing the good doctor kicking butt and taking names in the captain’s chair, it’s understandable that fans wanted to see more of Crusher in command.
No Future In Command
According to Gates McFadden, this didn’t happen very much because producers were busy developing Voyager. The timing of that show’s development generally matches McFadden’s account; Dr. Crusher led the Enterprise to victory over the Borg at the beginning of The Next Generation’s seventh season, which is exactly when the powers that be began working on Voyager. Because the producers knew the spinoff would have a female captain, they wanted to make Captain Janeway’s appearance special, effectively downplaying Dr. Crusher’s capabilities at commanding a starship.
Why was it so important for Voyager to have a female captain, though? While Deep Space Nine had proven to be a very successful TNG spinoff, Paramount wanted to create yet another Star Trek television show. Deciding that the new show would take place on a starship (hey, you can only do the space station gimmick once!), the producers faced a unique problem: how to make a new Star Trek show with this familiar setting that didn’t just feel like a lazy copy of The Next Generation.
Star Trek Leans In (At Dr. Crusher’s Expense)
Part of what would ultimately make Voyager unique was its setting: namely, in the largely uncharted Delta Quadrant that the Borg call home. The crew would also be a mixture of Starfleet and Maquis personnel, which would provide (on paper, anyway) the potential for more character conflict than we ever saw on The Next Generation. Mostly, though, what set Voyager apart was that it was led by a female captain, a first for a franchise whose first show infamously claimed that women couldn’t become Starfleet officers.
Sadly, the production of Voyager kept Dr. Crusher sidelined from possible command duties. This is doubly painful because her character was often written very poorly, and she went from drunkenly throwing herself at Picard in Season 1 to boning down with a ghost in Season 7. She was also written out of Season 2 altogether by Maurice Hurley, the worst showrunner The Next Generation ever had.
Gates McFadden ultimately got the last laugh, though: Picard brought her character back for its third and final season, and both Dr. Crusher and her son became pivotal parts of the entire plot. This was arguably an even beefier revival of her vintage character than Kate Mulgrew got by voicing Captain Janeway in Prodigy. Furthermore, Picard even made Crusher an admiral and the new Head of Starfleet Medical, finally giving the dancing doctor her due after more than 35 years of writers holding her back!
Google- and Microsoft-backed Terradot acquires carbon-removal competitor
How the Patriots Can Upset the Seahawks in Super Bowl LX
