Entertainment
How One PG-13 Sci-Fi Movie Destroyed An R-Rated Franchise
By Drew Dietsch
| Published
You know what I should talk about more? Sci-fi movies from the ‘90s. I feel like I haven’t given that niche genre enough attention.
Obviously, I love ‘90s cinema as many of our videos prove, and the sci-fi of the decade is a particular favorite genre. But I have another qualifier to add: franchise films. I find franchise filmmaking fascinating from a certain point of view.
While it can be fun and creatively stimulating to talk about canon and carryover characters and all the direct art involved in franchise films, it’s more intriguing to me to look at franchise movies from their strategic standpoints.
Specifically, what are these different movies attempting to do both collectively and individually when it comes to their franchise mindset?
Basically, what is an identifiable success point a franchise film entry is trying to achieve? Other than, you know, buttloads of cash.
Our subject today is a franchise sequel that many fans and casual audiences saw exactly what it was trying to achieve and rejected it, putting its movie franchise on ice for over two decades.
This is why RoboCop 3 failed.
RoboCop 3 And Why It Failed

Alright, let’s get personal real quick. RoboCop is my second favorite film of all time. It’s a movie that I could talk about forever and why it’s so personal to me, but we’ve got a failure to analyze. If you’d like to see that kind of video, make sure to mention that in the comments.
Suffice to say, RoboCop is a well-established genre classic that, if you haven’t seen it, you’re depriving yourself of an effects blockbuster that takes as much care with its story and characters as it does the action and comedy.
As far as RoboCop 2 is concerned, we’re only going to talk about it as it relates to RoboCop 3. If you’d like to hear my thoughts on RoboCop 2, check out the GenreVision movie club episode we did on it for our We Are the Robots theme month.

RoboCop 2 is important to the story of both RoboCop 3’s production and actual in-movie story. RoboCop 2 was mostly written by Frank Miller, one of the most celebrated comic book writers and artists of the ‘80s.
In June 1990, when Orion Pictures was about to release RoboCop 2, the studio gave the greenlight to two more movies. Since you won’t find a RoboCop 4 out there, you can guess how things are already headed.
Frank Miller had a tumultuous time during RoboCop 2’s production but returned for RoboCop 3, even though his screenplay would get handed to another writer, who would also end up directing the film.

Fred Dekker got the job and he was certainly qualified when it comes to being a legitimate genre fan. He had written and directed the delightful Universal Monsters homage, The Monster Squad, and Night of the Creeps, a movie I’ve recommended on this channel in a video pretty much nobody watched.
Basically, Fred Dekker was someone who genuinely loved this stuff. But, his script had another major creative influence, one that would end up being a significant factor in RoboCop 3 being disliked by fans.
Orion Pictures had been able to turn the success from the first RoboCop into a merchandise cash cow, capitalizing with toys, comic books, video games, and even an ‘80s cartoon.
By the time RoboCop 3 was underway, Orion wanted to better their chances at the box office by making sure RoboCop 3 could sell tickets to as many potential theater patrons as possible. That meant RoboCop 3 would be the first film in the franchise to actively aim for a PG-13 rating.
Real quick aside:

Moving on, RoboCop 3 would abandon the graphic violence of the first two films in favor of courting younger viewers. This was a prime directive from Orion to Fred Dekker. So, for all the problems people load on this movie, I have nothing but empathy when it comes to Dekker’s situation.
It didn’t help that RoboCop himself, actor Peter Weller, was not available for the sequel because he was busy making a wonderful David Cronenberg nightmare instead. And there are worthwhile reports about Weller being too expensive for Orion to afford for another sequel. I’m willing to believe some part of that considering the ultimate fate of Orion Pictures which ties directly to RoboCop 3.
RoboCop 3’s production began in February of 1991 and concluded in May that same year, with the film’s intended release set for mid-1992, giving the effects-heavy movie lots of post-production and marketing time.

However, Orion Pictures ended up having to close up shop and declare bankruptcy before they could facilitate the release of RoboCop 3, leaving the movie as part of an asset sale. Because of this, RoboCop 3 wouldn’t see a U.S. release until November 1993, debuting in international markets earlier that year thanks to a previous deal with Columbia Pictures.
As you can see, there were a lot of foundational issues RoboCop 3 had that were pretty much dooming it every step of the way. If the movie itself had been able to overcome those obstacles, maybe it would’ve found more appreciation.
And I’ll admit, when judging RoboCop 3 as its own singular thing, not as a RoboCop movie, it’s mostly okay for a kid’s sci-fi movie about the crossroads of capitalism and fascism.

Robert Burke stands in for Peter Weller and it’s just not happening. Again, I also don’t envy Burke having to step in for the series’ lead actor. And the role can often be a thankless and effectively faceless one, but he just doesn’t have the spark of Alex Murphy in him.
There are positive elements worth highlighting in RoboCop 3. We get a number of great character actors like Stephen Root, the awesome CCH Pounder, and my personal favorite, Rip Torn. Plus, maestro Basil Poledouris is back after not being used for RoboCop 2, so at least we’ve got that iconic theme back and another score from one of cinema’s greatest composers.
There’s a lot going on in RoboCop 3’s story and that’s certainly one of its problems, like when it’s trying to shove an android assassin into the mix, but the best and key plot centers around the poor of Detroit being forcibly thrown out of their homes for the eventual construction of a proposed utopia called Delta City.

This is the movie’s best bit of commentary as we see fascist soldiers called Urban Rehabilitation a.k.a. Rehabs being nothing but stormtroopers, and then seeing them portrayed as heroic action figures in one of the franchise’s trademark in-world commercials.
But as poignant as that story thread could be, the rest of the movie is a mess. There’s an oddly resonant plot for Orion Pictures themselves where OCP, the evil mega-corporation from the first two films, is being sold off and taken over by another company. This does lead to a few moments of welcome dark comedy but it doesn’t really matter to the story.
There’s also a stereotypical brainy kid character in this that’s annoying, and RoboCop spends a lot of the movie on the sidelines, and they kill Nancy Allen’s Lewis for no good reason.
Look, there’s just a lot about RoboCop 3 that either doesn’t work or is dumb but not in a fun way. And after sitting on the shelf for too long, it was clear audiences could smell something was up.
RoboCop 3 unfortunately but somewhat appropriately opened at #3 at the box office in 1993 behind a #1 movie in its third week of wide release, The Nightmare Before Christmas. I guess Schoolhouse Rock was right: three is a magic number.
It ended its run in North America with only $10 million dollars to show for it, less than half of its reported budget. And the fallout from the film’s failure would see Fred Dekker sent to director jail from whence he has never returned. Yes, RoboCop 3 killed Fred Dekker’s directing career.

It would also kill the future of RoboCop movies for over twenty years until a reboot hit theaters in 2014.
RoboCop 3 failed for so many reasons. The studio imposed bad creative decisions at the same time they were falling apart financially, the series lead got recast, and the final movie simply didn’t offer anything more than audiences felt they’d already got out of the franchise.
When it’s all said and done, I don’t think RoboCop 3 is a horrendous movie but it feels like a weak episode of a RoboCop TV series. Oh no, please don’t make me watch the RoboCop TV series. Am I going to see a bunch of comments begging for a video on the RoboCop series? Will you liking this video put that evil on me?
If you do enjoy torturing me, you better subscribe to the channel. That’s the only way you can ensure my continued RoboCop suffering. Thank you for your cooperation and we’ll see you next time here on Giant Freakin Robot.
Entertainment
Anthropics Claude overtakes ChatGPT in App Store
In the battle for AI supremacy, Anthropic’s Claude has just managed to dethrone OpenAI’s ChatGPT in Apple’s App Store, claiming the #1 spot as the most-downloaded free app in the United States, leaving ChatGPT in second and Google’s Gemini a distant fourth.
This sudden surge in the rankings is almost certainly due to public backlash at a recent announcement by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, released on X, that they would work with the Department of Defense (unofficially titled the Department of War) to deploy artificial intelligence through its classified networks.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This announcement comes on the heels of a public stand by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei against the unrestricted use of AI by governments, in which he specifically highlighted the dangers of both “mass domestic surveillance” and “fully autonomous weapons” powered by AI.
While much of the general public, nervous about the speed and scope of AI’s sudden prominence, viewed this as a principled stand, President Donald Trump saw it as a rebuke of government policy: “The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE trying to STRONG-ARM the Department of War, and force them to obey their Terms of Service instead of our Constitution,” he wrote in a Truth Social post.
Mashable Light Speed
The Trump administration, acting through Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, has since sought to designate Anthropic as a “supply-chain risk to national security,” an unprecedented label for an American company and a move that would make it impossible for them to secure government contracts in the future.
In a cross-company show of support for Anthropic’s stance, more than 700 employees of both Google and OpenAI have signed an open letter, “We Will Not Be Divided,” that concludes forcefully:
“We hope our leaders will put aside their differences and stand together to continue to refuse the Department of War’s current demands for permission to use our models for domestic mass surveillance and autonomously killing people without human oversight.”
More recently, and as proof that the average person is sensitive to these ethical issues, the general public is weighing in as well, shifting their loyalty from ChatGPT to Claude. To put this shift into perspective, an Anthropic spokesperson told Mashable over email that free users up 60%+ since January, daily signups tripled since November (breaking the all-time record every day this week), and paid subscribers more than doubled this year.” Per the spokesperson, Anthropic ranked #42 before Super Bowl LX and has since ranked in the top 10 in the US app charts.
With the AI revolution still in full swing, the battle for its soul is still being fought, and this latest flare-up proves that the average person still has leverage.
Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable’s parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.
Topics
Artificial Intelligence
Entertainment
The Scariest Film On Netflix Is Carried By Two Star Trek Greats
By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

For actors, performing in Star Trek is often a double-edged sword. On the one hand, they quickly gain a legion of new fans, and they can spend a lifetime appearing at nerd conventions filled with hungry autograph seekers. On the other hand, they might need those convention appearances when they inevitably get typecast as their famous sci-fi character.
Every now and then, though, Star Trek actors break free of their famous franchise and show us what they can do in entirely different genres. A great example of this is Green Room (2015), a viscerally disturbing horror film featuring veteran spacers Patrick Stewart and Anton Yelchin. If you want to see what happens when these two set their acting phasers to “stunning,” all you have to do is stream its macabre madness for yourself on Netflix.
When Horror Goes Punk

The premise of Green Room is that after a punk band’s gig gets canceled, a radio host finds them an alternate venue with one big catch: it’s a neo-Nazi bar. After they play, the band discovers a dead body in the titular green room, and that’s when everything goes to hell. Just like that, a band of traveling musicians just trying to make a name for themselves are caught in a fight for their lives against unflinching foes who won’t stop until they are six feet in the ground.
Green Room has a few surprising names in its cast, including Imogen Poots (best known for 28 Weeks Later) and Alia Shawkat (best known for Arrested Development). But in terms of young leads, nobody in this film is killing it quite as much as Anton Yelchin (best known for the 2009 Star Trek), who helps give this punk rock film its beating heart. Meanwhile, Patrick Stewart (best known for Star Trek: The Next Generation) does his best to rip that heart out, giving an absolutely chilling performance as the film’s ultimate Big Bad.
From Box Office Bomb To Critical Darling

Sadly, Green Room was a box office bust when it first came out, earning only $3.8 million against a budget of $5 million. Losing the studio money like this ensured that we would never get a proper sequel, which is a shame because this is one of the most unsettlingly effective horror films of the modern age. Fortunately, the film eventually established itself as a cult hit, and the growing number of fans soon joined the legion of critics who had already dubbed Green Room a modern masterpiece.
When Green Room came out, it quickly won over professional reviewers with its electrical intensity and charismatic performances. On Rotten Tomatoes, it had a rating of 90 percent, with critics praising the film for its intelligent execution of a brilliant genre script. They also spoke highly of Star Trek veterans Patrick Stewart and Anton Yelchin, whose immense talents help to highlight the generation gap at the heart of this movie’s surprisingly trenchant commentary on the intersection of punk music and Neonazi violence.
This Film Is Nonstop Tension

Part of why this movie works is that it leaves you in a constant state of tension that is punctuated only by horrific acts of brutal violence. This isn’t a horror film where the characters have fun vibing out until they are picked off, one by one, by some faceless killer. Instead, Green Room keeps its protagonist on the edge of their seat, and we are right there along with them; when the hammer finally drops, you’ll let out the breath you didn’t realize you were holding, if only so you can finally scream.
Additionally, the violence of Green Room is that much more impactful because everything is gritty and down to Earth. This isn’t a movie filled with stylized action, quippy one-liners, or lantern-jawed heroes saving the day; rather, it’s a movie in which our flawed heroes constantly make mistakes, which is that much more horrifying because everyone in this film is just one screw-up away from death. When (not if) death comes for your favorite characters, it’s in the form of unpolished violence sure to give you some serious nightmares.
Scream Me Up, Scotty!

At the center of those nightmares will be Sir Patrick Stewart, who is delightfully cast against type as a Neonazi leader who never met a problem he couldn’t solve with murder. His performance is electric, and he commands your attention every moment that he’s in the frame. That’s the genius of his casting, of course: for audiences used to seeing him as the genial Captain Picard, it’s wonderfully perverse to see his commanding presence and hear his confident baritone coming out of a character who is pure evil incarnate.
Will you agree that Green Room is one of the most terrifying tales of the modern age, or would you rather tell this Nazi punk film to f*** off? The only way to find out is to grab the remote (it’s in the green room, next to the snacks) and stream it for yourself on Netflix. Afterwards, you may finally learn a lesson that horror movies have been trying to teach us since The Texas Chain Saw Massacre: there’s nothing scarier in America than the terrors you’ll find in a small town!

Entertainment
Sci-Fi's Greatest Arc Belongs To A Character With Only 5 Episodes
By Jonathan Klotz
| Published

Part of what made Babylon 5 a unique sci-fi experience is that J. Michael Straczynski wrote the entire story in advance. There were pitfalls he didn’t expect, such as losing series lead Michael O’Hare after only one season, but there were also successes he couldn’t have foreseen, most notably, the Minbari Warrior Caste member Neroon turning into a fan favorite.
If JMS had seen this coming, maybe Neroon would have appeared in more than five episodes during the course of the series. As it is, every single one of his appearances was turned into a highlight of the episode, if not the entire season.
The Minbari’s Greatest Warrior

Neroon was brought to life by John Vickery, an accomplished stage actor who also appeared multiple times on Star Trek in the 90s as various aliens. His distinctive voice brought a level of authority and gravitas to Neroon, whether he was threatening humans, praising humans, or extolling the noble virtues of the Minbari Warrior Caste. The space station Babylon 5 was used by hundreds of different species on a daily basis, and to Neroon, all of them were inferior to the Minbari.
In his first appearance, Neroon investigates the disappearance of the Minbari leader Bramner’s corpse, with Babylon 5 Security Chief Michael Garibaldi (Jerry Doyle) as his prime suspect. The two reach an accord, and for once, Neroon starts to appreciate humanity. Then came his duel with Ranger Marcus Cole (Jason Carter) in “Grey 17 is Missing.” Cole is completely outclassed by Neroon, one of the greatest warriors in the galaxy, and yet, Cole is willing to risk his life in the service of Delenn (Mira Furlan), a member of the Minbari Religious Caste. Both survived the duel to the death, but, as Neroon admits, a part of himself died in the battle.
One Of Sci-Fi’s Best Character Arcs

“Grey 17 is Missing” is Neroon’s third appearance on Babylon 5. In his ensuing appearances, it’s clear that the boisterous warrior is a little different. He’s more open to Delenn and the Religious Caste, and when the Minbari Civil War heats up, he’s working towards a peaceful accord. On the surface. As viewers find out, he has his own goals for the Minbari while remaining true to the traditions of the Warrior Caste. Neroon’s last appearance on the series is one of the show’s best moments and the perfect way to end his story. Except it comes in Season 4.
Babylon 5 was going to end with Season 4, so JMS moved events up to get to the show’s endgame before cancellation. The Season 5 renewal threw off his plans, and while some things were able to be delayed (notably Londo and the Centaurians), Neroon and the Minbari wrapped up too early. Fans were denied more time with the noble warrior, but then again, the calling of his heart was religious, the calling of his honor was war. Five episodes were all it took for sci-fi’s greatest character arc.
You can stream Babylon 5 on The Roku Channel or on YouTube, but we don’t suggest that. 30 years later, John Vickery’s work as Neroon is part of why it remains one of the best sci-fi shows of all time.
