Entertainment
Raunchy, R-Rated Comedy Finds Purpose Where You Least Expect It
By Robert Scucci
| Published

There’s no problem in life that can’t be solved by an epic rant because it’s the best way to lay all your thoughts out on the table and properly dissect them. In 2025’s Is This Thing On?, these rants come in the form of an amateur stand-up set as a man tries to navigate his upcoming divorce. What starts as a completely impulsive move turns into a lifeline for Will Arnett’s Alex Novak, who doesn’t necessarily want to move on without his wife and kids, but doesn’t yet know how to accept this phase of his life.
A comedy drama with an extra emphasis on comedy, Is This Thing On? is a feel-good story about falling out of love, coping with the loss, and picking up the pieces in unexpected ways. If I have any criticism of the film, it’s that it’s just a little too convenient, and the stakes, all things considered, are considerably low for the kind of point it’s trying to get across. The concept, which is loosely based on English comedian John Bishop’s life, is fun, and it’s a light watch. It’s a great movie about second chances, and sometimes that’s all you really need after a particularly tumultuous week on the home front.
From Bachelor Pad To Comedy Club

Is This Thing On? doesn’t have much going on at a narrative level, but its character arcs are still satisfying. Amicably separated from his wife of 20 odd years, Tess (Laura Dern), Alex Novak (Will Arnett) feels lost post-marriage. Their divorce wasn’t rancorous, and they still run in the same social circles. They live separately, but share custody of their two kids, Felix (Blake Kane) and Jude (Calvin Knegten). By all measures, this is the healthiest way to approach divorce, but it’s obvious that the separation is gnawing away at both Alex and Tess, who no longer feel like a couple but still show up for each other every day.
After eating a pot cookie with Tess and accidentally getting separated at the train station, Alex walks into a comedy club. Not having any cash on hand, he signs up for an open mic to get out of paying the cover charge, and something awakens in him that night. He goes on stage and kills it, finding the sense of purpose outside of his white-collar job and family life that he’s been desperately craving.

It doesn’t take long for him to become an open mic regular, and eventually a featured act, unbeknownst to his family, which is probably for the better. Since most of his jokes are about his failed marriage, it’s a good thing that Tess doesn’t hear his rants. That is, until she shows up at a comedy club by sheer coincidence and sees him in action.
From this point forward in Is This Thing On?, Alex and Tess decide to give their relationship a second chance, learning the real reason their marriage failed now that they’ve had some time apart. It’s not like everything gets fixed overnight, but they still have feelings for each other, even if they don’t quite know how to move forward at this point in their lives.
When A Feel-Good Movie Feels Too Good

A total feel-good movie through and through, Is This Thing On? is about more than life after divorce and one man’s attempt to pick up the pieces. By all measures, Alex is killing it. He’s showing up for his family in ways he neglected in the past, and his comedy hobby puts a bounce in his step. His new lease on life is immediately noticed by the woman who no longer wanted to be with him, but decides that she does upon realizing that she could also be chasing her dreams of being an Olympic volleyball coach while supporting him with his.
The problem with this dynamic, however, is that it doesn’t feel plausible, even if it’s inspired by a true story. Too many critical changes happen too quickly, making the whole thing play out like a Lifetime movie, which is unfortunate because with a little more drama and tension, this could have been a perfect movie. It explores themes that a lot of married couples struggle with, but its “conflict” is borderline nonexistent.

For what it’s worth, though, it’s a nice movie about finding a new purpose in life well into adulthood, when you should be set in your ways, and that’s really all it needs to be. I’m not buying how clean everything resolves here, but if these things happened in my life, it’s probably how I’d want them to play out.

As of this writing, Is This Thing On? is streaming on Hulu.
Entertainment
iPhone exploit DarkSword has been released in the wild: How to protect yourself
DarkSword, the web-based hacker tool that can be used to steal data from millions of iPhones, has just been published on GitHub for public use. Cybersecurity experts say Russian hacking groups are actively using DarkSword “to fully compromise devices.”
Now that the exploit is public, any would-be cybercriminal can just quickly copy and paste the DarkSword code, take a few minutes to set it up on their web host, and deploy the spyware.
Last week, reports about the new hacker tool called DarkSword sparked so much concern in the security world that Apple was forced to issue a quick response explaining how the company is addressing the threat. The reports came from Google’s Threat Intelligence Group and two cybersecurity firms, iVerify and Lookout.
Want to be the first to hear about our latest tech coverage? Sign up for Mashable’s Top Stories and Deals newsletters today.
What is DarkSword?
DarkSword is an exploit that lets hackers steal data from vulnerable iPhones running outdated versions of iOS.
DarkSword has concerned cybersecurity professionals because it doesn’t require that the hacker’s target download any malware or corrupted files. Hackers can simply download the DarkSword HTML and Javascript and upload it to a compromised website. If a user with an old version of iOS visits the compromised site, their device becomes vulnerable. The hacker can then steal data such as passcodes, emails, private messages, and more from the victim’s iPhone.
Mashable Light Speed
As Lookout reported last week:
In a tangible example of how attacks are evolving, Lookout Threat Labs has discovered DarkSword, a full iOS exploit chain and payload for iPhones running iOS versions between iOS 18.4 and 18.6.2…DarkSword aims to extract an extensive set of personal information including credentials from the device and specifically targets a plethora of crypto wallet apps, hinting at a financially motivated threat actor. Notably, DarkSword appears to take a ‘hit-and-run’ approach by collecting and exfiltrating the targeted data from the device within seconds or at most minutes followed by cleanup.
Google cybersecurity researchers reported that the notorious hacker group UNC6353, which is suspected to have ties with the Russian government, previously deployed DarkSword on compromised Ukrainian government agency sites to target iPhone users within Ukraine.
iVerify told TechCrunch that the DarkSword exploit that’s now in the wild is slightly different but “shared the same infrastructure.” According to iVerify, no iOS experience is needed to run the exploit and it will work “out of the box.”
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
As TechCrunch also reported, another X user shared that they were able to hack their iPad mini 6th gen running iOS 18.6.2 with the DarkSword exploit that was just released in the wild.
Apple previously reported on its developer website that nearly 25 percent of all iPhones are still running iOS 18, meaning hundreds of millions of iOS devices are susceptible to this exploit. The current version of iOS is iOS 26.3.1.
How to protect your Apple devices from DarkSword
Google’s Threat Intelligence Group urged iOS users to update their devices to the newest version of iOS, and if that’s not possible, to activate the iPhone’s Lockdown Mode.
Apple also said that it pushed out a critical security update on March 11 for older iOS devices that can’t install the more up-to-date iOS in order to protect these devices from DarkSword. Users with devices running iOS 13 or iOS 14 need to update to iOS 15 to receive these critical protections.
Entertainment
Unrated, Extremely Graphic Thriller Tries To Kill You But Can’t
By Robert Scucci
| Published

1978’s The Odd Job is a comedy of errors about a man who hires a janitor to kill him because he’s too much of a coward to end his own life. It’s a slapstick effort written by Graham Chapman that’s way funnier than its critical reputation suggests, and on one hand, I get it. It’s essentially the same gag repeated over and over again, with mixed results, landing if you’re a fan of the kind of irreverent humor that only somebody from the Monty Python comedy troupe could deliver with a wink and a nod.
Toying with a similar premise is 2014’s The Suicide Theory, which centers on a comparable setup but with wildly different results (namely, it’s not a comedy). In The Suicide Theory, we’re introduced to a contract killer hired by a man who no longer wants to live. The problem is that he’s given suicide the old college try on countless occasions leading up to this point and is convinced he’s invincible. While both films feature the same kind of contractual relationship in which one man wants to be eliminated from his mortal coil, The Suicide Theory is existentially heavy, focusing primarily on fate, free will, and how they’re constantly at odds with each other.
Steven And Percival’s Deadly Dynamic

The Suicide Theory wastes no time setting up its conflict when Steven (Steve Mouzakis) is tracked down by a desperate man named Percival (Leon Cain). Percival already looks worse for wear, with scars all over his face indicating that he wouldn’t be hiring a hitman if he hadn’t already tried to die, and failed miserably, countless times. Not even sure if Steven can successfully kill him, Percival hands over a large sum of cash and tells the killer that he doesn’t want to see it coming, and that since he believes he may be cursed, an attempt can only be made on his life if he looks legitimately happy.
Up to the challenge, but not one to believe Percival’s claims, Steven immediately shoots Percival in the chest three times upon making the arrangement, only for the man to wake up hours later in the hospital with no major injuries. Percival is further upset when he learns that the doctors found a massive tumor near one of the bullet wounds and were able to remove it while they were in there, meaning getting shot actually saved his life.

Fascinated by this project, Steven, who’s lost his passion for contract killing, keeps his promise and continues searching for new ways to execute Percival, none of which work. Steven, who’s been afraid of crossing streets ever since his wife was struck by a car and killed three years prior, can’t always chase Percival down due to his phobia, but has no qualms about hailing a taxi cab to help him cross the street if he needs to.
An Exploration Of Fate And Purpose
As we get to know the two principal players in The Suicide Theory, it becomes evident that they’re not so different. One man is a hardened, cold-hearted killer who’s lost his passion for the game, while the other is so deeply wounded that even multiple suicide attempts can’t put him out of his misery.

It’s almost as if he’s done something so horrible in life that his cosmic punishment is never being able to end it on his own terms. The two men become friends, if you could call it that, and come to realize they were supposed to meet each other, as if fate had been waiting for them. The reason their paths cross, when finally revealed, is the kind of gut punch that will make you wish you were watching The Odd Job instead, because it’s a brutal way to spend your time.
The Suicide Theory is not an easy watch, but it’s a rewarding one. It’s an exploration of fate and destiny taken to its most morbid conclusion, and it’s not without a dark sense of humor. It’s not “haha” funny by any stretch, but every time Percival wakes up in the hospital wondering how he made it out alive this time, you can’t help but sport a wry smile because he’s trying everything he can to not wake up ever again. Steven’s odyssey is all about finding purpose; he wants to hang up his gun for good, but knows this last job is an important one. But it’s up to you, dear reader, to figure out why.


The Suicide Theory is currently streaming for free on Tubi.
Entertainment
Yes, Streaming Services Are Conspiring Against You
By Jennifer Asencio
| Published

Disney has endured in charming memory for decades, but all that shines isn’t always King Brian’s gold. The company has been in the news in recent weeks, and for none of the right reasons. There was the recent shakeup in leadership in addition to being sued by their head of games for discrimination. When you add in the negative press by Snow White star Rachel Zeigler, they have been weighed down more heavily than the chains of Jacob Marley. On March 5th, 2026, Disney reached a tentative settlement with the courts and regulators on its anti-trust actions.
Replacing Cable By Becoming Cable

After acquiring Hulu and ESPN, Disney began to enforce strict policy terms. Companies like YouTube TV and DIRECTV stream were required to offer more expensive packages for ESPN if they wanted other Disney products, forcing up the cost of streaming services. Leveraging the sports network’s popularity, the Magic Kingdom refused to offer lower-cost packages that didn’t include ESPN, so anyone who wanted Disney content was forced to buy the more expensive sports package. The class action lawsuit, which was filed initially back in 2023, has finally concluded in a settlement in which Disney avoided further litigation by settling rather than admitting fault.
The $50-million-dollar settlement will affect anywhere between 11 and 17 million people. With the higher price floor and contract terms, those companies had to pass the cost on to their customers. Disney has also agreed to immediate relief by giving companies the option to offer fewer or even no Disney-owned networks, like ESPN, in the packages that previously had them.

As more streaming services come up and more silos are created, content becomes even harder for people to reach. The streaming giants that once started to counter the stranglehold that traditional cable companies operated have now taken their place. The public is burdened with higher costs, too many options, and limited content over who has what and for how long. In the future hopefully, this lawsuit will demonstrate to those entertainment giants that they will be held accountable for their actions.
What the next phase in entertainment will be is still being decided. Will people ditch streaming like they ditched the dish, the box, and the cord? If more anti-trust suits like this one turn up while streaming services gobble up every bit of content they can, it may be inevitable.
