Entertainment
The Best Horror Studio Sells Out To AI, Betraying Its Greatest Director
By Chris Snellgrove
| Updated

A24 has released a number of different films over the years, including coming-of-age dramas like Lady Bird, sci-fi thinkers like Ex-Machina, and superhero deconstructions like Everything Everywhere All At Once. Primarily, however, they are known as a horror studio thanks to genre-redefining hits like Hereditary and Midsommar. To really drive the point home, A24 is responsible for one of the breakout hits of the summer: Backrooms, a micro-budget horror film that is earning money hand over fist while the latest Star Wars film flounders at the box office.
A24 already had a sterling rep with horror fans, and they earned even more cred for giving such a great platform to YouTube sensation Kane Parsons (the director of Backrooms). Unfortunately, A24 is about to squander all of this goodwill by partnering with Google on an AI project. This has left many who would rather keep AI away from art feeling more than a bit betrayed. Rival horror director Curry Barker is likely feeling that betrayal, too. The Obsession mastermind has prominently spoken out against the use of AI in film, and many feel Obsession is secretly an anti-AI film.
AI: Hollywood’s Latest Obsession

Recently, A24 announced a partnership with Google, and the search giant has invested a whopping $75 million into this partnership. What are they doing together, exactly? The short answer is that the studio will be working with Google’s DeepMind division in an attempt to develop AI tools that could help out future filmmakers. On paper, this is a deal that really benefits the studio the most. While A24 will have access to DeepMind’s extensive research and powerful infrastructure, Google will not get access to the studio’s own content or media library.
What will these AI tools look like, exactly? While there’s no way to know every tool they might develop, A24 Labs lead researcher, Scott Belsky, told The Wall Street Journal the studio isn’t interested in simply producing films cheaper and faster. Rather, they are exploring applications like AI-generated storyboards, an idea supported by Martin Scorsese. “We think there are better uses that preserve creative control and support risk-taking,” Belsky said. In a perfect world, this would leave all of the direct creative elements in filmmakers’ hands while simply streamlining production of the film.
Driving Fans A Little Crazy

Still, many fans who want AI out of film altogether have taken to social media, announcing that they plan to boycott future A24 films because of this partnership with Google. Those fans feel betrayed by creatives embracing AI at all and that any use of this technology is a slippery slope to making worse films. One person likely feeling betrayed is Curry Barker, who recently told The Guardian that “I’m scared of AI” and suggested that audiences would effectively vote with their dollars.
“I feel like there’s going to be AI content and there’s going to be our content, and it’s going to be well, where’s the demand at?” he asked. Given the success of Obsession (an insanely successful movie made for cheap, all without AI), it seems clear Barker is betting human-made content will always win out.

In a different interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Barker was asked what movie studios needed to know about Gen Z. He responded that his generation is “tired of slop” and just wants “good movies back.” Considering that “AI slop” has become the term for all AI-generated content, Barker will presumably keep avoiding this technology. He may also continue quietly crusading against it. Many critical reactions to Obsession noted that the movie feels like an anti-AI allegory. After all, Bear is an AI user whose desire for a fully devoted girlfriend is not unlike men who prefer AI girlfriends that they can more easily control.
At any rate, this partnership with Google represents a major step back for A24. The studio likely embraced this deal, thinking it would put them on the cutting edge of cinematic content. Unfortunately, they made this deal at the height of AI backlash, all while Curry Barker, horror’s hottest new director, is being very vocal about the dangers of AI. By the time it’s all over, A24 will likely wish they had never embraced AI so wholeheartedly. When that happens, though, not even a One Wish Willow will be able to undo the damage to their brand.
Entertainment
Star Trek Showrunner Confirms Doctor Who Crossover Almost Happened
By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

Star Trek and Doctor Who are two of the world’s longest-running sci-fi franchises, with each show making its debut in the ‘60s and continuously telling new stories over the decades. There is some interesting parallelism to each franchise: both Trek and Who constantly reinvent themselves with new casts, and both have been off the air for long periods before coming back. Now, both of these iconic IPs are in the same boat. Doctor Who is off the air indefinitely until the BBC finds a buyer, and Trek is no longer producing shows as part of a (likely doomed) pivot to film.
For all of these similarities, however, the two franchises almost had something else in common: shared onscreen adventures. Former Doctor Who showrunner Russell T. Davies previously confirmed his desire to have a crossover between his show and Enterprise, but the cancellation of this Star Trek spinoff made that impossible. Now, Strange New Worlds showrunner Akiva Goldsman confirmed that he also worked with Davies for years to try to make a modern crossover happen. Unfortunately, history repeated itself, and they were unable to make a crossover happen before both shows were finished.
Crossover Plans Were Bigger On The Inside

Fans of both fandoms thought we might be getting a crossover when the Doctor Who episode “Space Babies” streamed in 2024. At one point, new Companion Ruby compares the technology of the TARDIS to the technology of Star Trek. She is clearly referring to the sci-fi franchise as a work of fiction. However, the Doctor smiles and enthusiastically responds, “We’ve got to meet them one day!” He seemed to think these characters were very real and worth a visit, strongly hinting that we might get a crossover. One year later, Trek upped the ante with an episode that made multiple references to Doctor Who.
The Strange New Worlds episode “The Sehlat Who Ate Its Tail” featured two very prominent Doctor Who homages. The first was the long-lived Pelia claiming that she had traveled with a Doctor, and her dialogue highly implies that she was a Companion to the Doctor. On top of that, eagle-eyed viewers noticed that the TARDIS was visible in some of the outer space shots. Between these references and the earlier Doctor Who episode, it seemed like a crossover was on the horizon, but we never got one. Now, Strange New Worlds co-showrunner Akiva Goldsman has revealed how heartbreakingly close we really got.
The Woman Who Lived (And Lived, And Lived, And Lived)

In a recent interview with Awards Radar, Goldsman was asked about “The Sehlat Who Ate Its Tail” and its reference to a certain timey-wimey someone. “We were trying with Russell to do a crossover. We were for years,” he said. “Again, these are the near misses, but we got not unclose, and we had some really cool conversations about it. And so, certainly in our view, I mean, Pelia traveled in the TARDIS. Why not?”
Back in 2024, Goldsman had announced his desire for a Star Trek/Doctor Who crossover at a fan convention. In response to a montage video showing what that might look like, he gushed, “That shows you what it would feel like, what it would look like… the joy of it. It must happen!” However, he also declared how difficult this would be and what role fans played in the whole thing. “If anyone can make that happen… it’s fans that can make that happen! Two great big broadcasters, two great big empires–and their lawyers!–would have to come together, but we can do that, can’t we?”
Doctor, To The Bridge!

Sadly, that confidence was obviously misplaced. Goldsman didn’t delve into details, but it’s almost certain that the lawyers for these two sci-fi franchises never saw eye to eye. Eventually, the crossover became outright impossible: Strange New Worlds finished shooting its fifth and final season. More recently, the BBC and showrunner Russel T. Davies (the man who pushed for a crossover in the first place!) confirmed that Doctor Who was going on indefinite hiatus.
However, fans still wanting a taste of what that crossover would look like can always read the engrossingly weird crossover comics from IDW Publishing. And we can all cross our fingers that someday, we’ll see David Tennant’s Doctor on the bridge of the Starship Enterprise ordering warp speed as only he can: “Allons-y!”
Entertainment
Babylon 5's First Season Shatters Star Trek's Utopian View Of Humanity
By Jonathan Klotz
| Updated

Star Trek has always had, at its core, the belief that humanity will come together over time, see past manmade differences, and approach the stars as a unified species. Gene Roddenberry’s series includes plenty examples of that not happening, but the basic tenet is the same, while J. Michael Straczynski’s Babylon 5 starts off with a different belief: humans are humans, we’ll argue, fight, disagree, and always find a way to separate ourselves and others. In the case of Season 1 Episode 7, “War Prayer,” it’s the introduction of the Homeguard, a militant anti-alien group that reveals humanity still has its bad apples.
The War Prayer Introduces The Homeguard

“The War Prayer” kicks off with a string of alien attacks onboard the space station with the expected response from the different ambassadors. Deleen (Mira Furlan) wants Sinclair (Michael O’Hare) to investigate, while G’kar (Andreas Katsulas) is rallying the aliens demanding more be done to keep them safe and punish those responsible. At the same time, and completely unrelated, Ivanova’s (Claudia Christian) former lover Malcolm (Soap Opera star Tristan Rogers) arrives on Babylon 5.
Jeffrey Sinclair and Ivanova are one-step ahead of the attackers, purposely putting on a public display of anti-alien sentiment to gain their trust, which works. Malcolm reveals that the use of Earthforce stealth technology lets his group get close to the aliens with the goal of killing the ambassadors, thus kicking off an alien race war. It didn’t work when Charles Manson tried it in 1969, and it still didn’t work in 2258. What it does succeed at, is reinforcing the underlying currents of “Infection,” and “Mind War,” by showing viewers that there’s a dark side to the world of Babylon 5.
Babylon 5 Is About Hope For Tomorrow

The Homeguard remains in the background of Babylon 5 but it was only the precursor to something worse in later seasons: Nightwatch. Under the reign of President William Clark, the paramilitary group conducts a reign of terror that doesn’t differentiate between aliens and those insufficiently loyal to Clark. To the Nightwatch, Homeguard is where the misfits who couldn’t hack it in their ranks go.
Looking back at “The War Prayer,” Malcolm’s plan is quaint compared to what happens with the Earth Alliance. It also sticks out as an early example of Babylon 5’s cynical worldview which exists, not to be the status quo, but to highlight the work of Sinclair, John Sheridan (Bruce Boxleitner), Garibaldi (Jerry Doyle), and Ivanova in working for a better tomorrow as a sign of hope that eventually humanity can change. Instead of Star Trek’s optimism tempered by later signs that not all is right with the Federation, Babylon 5 goes the opposite direction, and by the end of the series, there’s no doubt that humanity, and the universe, is in a better place.
Babylon 5 was one of the darker sci-fi series of the 90s but that’s what helped it become a huge hit with a rabid following to this day. The world-building on display within the first season pays off throughout the rest of the series with intricate, character-driven storylines and elaborate political machinations that have their roots within the first few episodes of Season 1. It’s a masterclass in writing science fiction and “The War Prayer” is only one example of creator JMS lanting seeds that pay off later.
Entertainment
Supergirl’s Writer May Be Who Destroys The DCU
By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

What do Warner Bros. executives and DC fans have in common? Simple: they are all looking for a scapegoat to blame for the box office failure of Supergirl. There are some obvious contenders here, including director Craig Gillespie (who made this cosmic road trip film look and feel excessively bland) and DC Studios CEO James Gunn, who insisted on making this the second film in the DCU. However, the internet’s preferred scapegoat right now is Ana Nogueira, the woman who wrote Supergirl. Some fans sounded the alarm when she was first hired, noting that the actor and playwright had written literally zero movies or TV shows before getting hired by James Gunn.
Still, that’s not exactly a dealbreaker. Curry Barker had not written or directed any feature films until Obsession, a movie made for $750,000 that ended up making more money than The Mandalorian and Grogu. Plus, geek icon James Gunn said that Nogueira’s script was one of the best he had ever seen, causing him to move Supergirl’s production schedule up and make it the second film in the DCU. Now that the movie is a critical and commercial dud, though, fans are worried about the DCU as a whole. That’s because Nogueira is also set to write Teen Titans and Wonder Woman, two of the most highly anticipated DC films.
An Inexperienced Screenwriter

Before writing Supergirl, Ana Nogueira established herself in Hollywood in a different way: as an actor rather than a screenwriter. She had recurring roles in popular shows like Blue Bloods and The Vampire Diaries; more recently, she had a meatier recurring role in Hightown. As a writer, she has mostly written for the theatre. When Lin-Manuel Miranda was still workshopping Hamilton, it was Nogueira who originated the insanely popular character Eliza Hamilton. She went on to write two plays of her own: Empathitrax in 2016 and Which Way to the Stage in 2022. Therefore, it’s disingenuous to say that she has no experience as a writer.
The problem, however, is how little experience she has in screenwriting. Previously, she was co-writer on a short film, We Win, in 2018. Otherwise, she has no prior writing credits for any feature films or TV shows. Previously, she submitted a horror script to Warner Bros. that never got made into a film. However, the studio was impressed enough to hire her to write a Supergirl film for the DCEU. She wrote two scripts, but neither saw the light of day before the DCEU imploded. When WB decided to move forward with Supergirl for the DCU, she was asked to pitch and ultimately hired for the job. The rest, unfortunately, is history.
One Movie Down, Two To Go

Clearly, Warner Bros. thought Ana Nogueira was a talented writer. DC Studios CEO James Gunn agreed, praising her script as one of the best he’s seen in a long time. It impressed him enough to accelerate Supergirl’s production schedule, making it the second feature film in the DCU. Even more notably, Nogueira’s script impressed him enough that she was chosen to write two more films: Teen Titans and Wonder Woman. Now that Supergirl has become a critical and commercial flop, though, fans are understandably worried that her next films will similarly underperform and effectively destroy the DCU.
That’s not guaranteed to happen, of course: Nogueira may learn from her mistakes and craft much better scripts for Wonder Woman and Teen Titans. Or maybe her writing is better than cynical fans think, and she just needs a better director than Craig Gillespie. If the studio gets nervous enough, they might give her the boot and hand those films to someone else. Bottom line? If some major changes happen, then the DCU can still be saved, especially if James Gunn’s Superman: The Man of Tomorrow is a huge hit. If no changes happen, though, Ana Nogueira may go from being a beloved Hollywood wunderkind to the woman who killed the DCU.
