Entertainment
Survivor Legend Humiliates Himself With Racism Accusations After Historic Merge Episode
By Jennifer Asencio
| Updated
The Survivor 50 merge episode aired on April 2, 2026, and proved to be the most explosive episode to that point, only to be followed by an equally exciting episode that proves the game has returned to its cutthroat roots. As if Christian Hubicki arranging the ouster of fan favorite and The White Lotus creator Mike White wasn’t fireworks enough, we lost no fewer than four contestants through Tribal Councils in two episodes, and the epic aftermath of the merge brought out the competitor in even the contestants who’ve been hanging back.
The merge episode was so good that it nearly made up for the hated Zac Brown episode a few weeks ago, in which the country music star hogged 30 minutes of screen time fishing, singing, and having more confessionals than some of the contestants. As soon as the castaways got on the merge beach, strategizing started immediately. Allies, like Hubicki and Rick Devens, were reunited; hidden immunity idols (held by Aubry Bracco, Ozzy Lusth, and Rizo Velovic) were sussed out; and targets were placed, particularly on legends Benjamin “Coach” Wade and Colby Donaldson, injured in a previous challenge.
Emily Flippen, who is turning out to be one of the season’s movers, pointed out the tribe could get “two for the price of one” by voting out Coach and waiting for Colby to be medivaced from the show. That is how ruthless the merge got.
Survivor’s Blood Moon
However, at the Immunity Challenge, host Jeff Probst sprung the surprise on the castaways that there would be a twist that night called The Blood Moon. With Ozzy and Rizo oblivious to this because they were off on a fortuitous jaunt to Exile Island together, the other 15 castaways were divided into three groups. The challenge was an individual immunity endurance challenge, but whatever group won would also be treated to Applebee’s at Survivor’s famous Sanctuary, “where good things happen” to the winners of rewards.
The twist was that each group of five had one immunity winner and would be going separately to Tribal Council rather than as a full merge tribe. Three people would be voted off, and which group each castaway was sorted to was entirely luck of the draw. This resulted in three Tribal Councils.
Survivor Legend Penner Humiliates Himself With Racism Accusations
The first group shown were the reward winners, Chrissy Hofbeck, Jonathan Young, Stephenie LaGrossa-Kendrick, Tiffany Ervin, and Kamila Kathigetsu, the latter of whom was the unlucky victim in a controversial tribal council that had real-world effects.
Two former CBS contestants got angry at Chrissy for claiming she, Jonathan, and Stephenie were “cut from the same cloth” when they allied to vote out either Tiffany or Kamila; since the latter two are women of color, the voting bloc, Chrissy in particular, was targeted as racist by Survivor alum Jonathan Penner and Big Brother contestant Hannah Chadda. The backlash was so bad that Chrissy Hofbeck deleted her X account.
In the aftermath of that outcome, Penner had this to say about his initial accusations: “Let’s just say I meant it as a joke, but as I say to my kids, there are no – jokes.”
The second group shown consisted of Genevieve Musaluk, Aubry, Hubicki, Devens, and Joe Hunter. Despite fireworks between the three men and a heated rivalry between the two women, the second group came together to vote out Genevieve in a move that was rather expected from this team.
The final tribal council of the merge episode was a tear-jerker for longtime fans of the show, including contestant Dee Valaderes, who had to choose between Emily, Colby, Coach, and their fellow legend, Cirie Fields. The only person in this group who actually wanted to vote was true gamer Emily, as the three legends and former winner Dee broke down in tears over how important these icons were to the history of Survivor. Before he was tragically voted out, Colby delivered a heartfelt speech about how much the show has been a part of his life for half of it, and the opportunities he was presented with thanks to his appearances.
Colby Speaks For The Fans
For many people, Survivor is a way to bond with family as they watch together and talk about it. Colby’s speech about what the show has done for him was felt by all of us, for whom the show has been meaningful as fans.
It was a bittersweet ending to an incredible episode, but fans were disappointed that the merge vote was split up the way it was because they wanted to see how the morass of everyone together in one tribal council would play out, rather than the New Era trick of splitting the vote. It was the one dark spot in an almost perfect episode.
Blood Moon’s Aftermath Episode
The next episode, aired April 9, 2026, saw the intertribal conflicts intensify as “trust clusters” (a term coined by former Survivor player Hannah Shapiro at tribal council during Millennials vs GenX) form. Ozzy and Rizo returned from their bonding trip to Exile Island to reunite with ally Cirie. Rizo wanted to enhance that alliance with Dee, except she blabbed his secret about having an idol to several people, and Emily told Rizo what she had done.
Emily is loosely allied with the super-nerd alliance of Devens and Hubicki, a duo that seems to be floating around together. Coach had formed an alliance he called The Four Horsemen; the loss of Colby prompted him to try to add Rizo alongside himself, Jonathan, and Joe. Further complicating alliances is Jonathan’s loyalty to Stephenie and Chrissy. Aubry and Tiffany don’t seem to have an alliance and are floating around the various webs of other alliances, just trying to survive.
Coach’s Plan Works To Perfection
Despite the attempts of the Cirie-Ozzy-Rizo voting block to save her, Dee landed herself in hot water when she betrayed Rizo’s secret about his immunity idol. This was further compounded when Jonathan took advantage of the buzz to rile her up enough to admit her role in the blindside of Charlie Davis a few episodes before. All this damning evidence against Dee prompted a haiku-spouting Coach to assemble what he called “7 and 4,” referring to the number of votes needed to vote Dee out and also to cover themselves with some votes for Tiffany in case Dee played her Shot in the Dark. Dee reacted by trying to put together votes against Coach, and it looked like tribal council was going to be a toss-up.
Coach’s plan worked to perfection, despite the show giving the appearance that he was in danger for his bossy behavior in assembling the vote. A sorry Dee was voted out for the first time in her Survivor career, with the only stray vote going to Coach and a warning shot fired across Tiffany’s bow in the form of the four security votes. Dee did play her Shot in the Dark, but it failed, so she lost her vote.
Stephenie LaGrossa’s Survivor Journey
Aside from explosive scheming and plenty of fighting, another notable moment in the episode saw Stephenie LaGrossa-Kendrick on a Survivor journey, one of the individual challenges that castaways are occasionally sent on. She didn’t really want to go and miss out on all the social play on the beach, but the group picked her name out of a bag, and she handled it with grace, especially when she saw what her challenge was: the infamous bucket on a swivel, to which one arm was chained, pointing straight up. A win would give her an advantage, a loss would not only drench her but also cost her her vote at the next tribal council.
This was a remarkable event because of Stephenie’s history on the show. She was notably the only castaway whose team lost so much that she was eventually its last member, alone on the Ulong beach in Palau for three days until the tribes merged. She was runner-up the following season in Guatemala, her blunt honesty costing her the top spot by rubbing the jury the wrong way.
However, it is Heroes vs Villains that had an impact on this challenge, because there, she dislocated her shoulder, had it reset in the middle of a very physical challenge, and then had to have surgery on it after the show ended. Forced to use her good arm, she persevered through the entire endurance challenge and won a Steal-a-Vote, allowing her to replace another castaway’s vote with her own at a time of her choosing.
Stephenie spent all day April 9 celebrating this achievement with a video posted to social media teasing the episode, and it was well-earned and richly deserved. As soon as she said, “This is my happy face,” I knew from her posts that we were in for an epic ride.
Survivor 50’s Contestants Are Here To Play
Overall, the episodes that have followed the Zac Brown fiasco have brought a lot of excitement, backstabbing, gameplay both impressive and sloppy, and even controversy. Survivor 50 may be embracing some of the more annoying conventions of the recent seasons of the show, but one thing that is definitely not present is the Girl Scout camp atmosphere: these people are here to play and aren’t pulling any punches.
This is the first season of Survivor in a long time where the contestants are willing to go to war for the million dollars, and it is refreshing to see. Viewers weren’t tuning in to watch the players have a sing-along; they tune in to watch exactly the drama that this season is delivering.
Catch Survivor 50 on CBS on Wednesday nights at 8pm EST and streaming on Paramount Plus the following day. You can also stream all the other seasons on Paramount Plus and get to know or reconnect with the contestants who were invited to return to play this fantastic season.
Entertainment
With Title And Logo Revealed, The New Ghostbusters Is Still Shrouded In Mystery
By Chris Snellgrove
| Published
It’s been a pretty weird decade to be a Ghostbusters fan. Paul Feige’s all-female movie was supposed to reboot the franchise for modern audiences and make the franchise mainstream again. Instead, it became a firestorm of controversy, and we eventually got Ghostbusters: Afterlife. While it was more about Spielbergian wonder than cynical wisecracks, Afterlife appealed to the old-school fans, earning enough money to warrant a sequel: Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire. However, Frozen Empire was a crowded, somewhat sloppy film that cost more and made less than Afterlife, leaving the future of the franchise uncertain.
Now, the latest iteration of Ghostbusters will be on the small screen rather than the big screen. A new, animated show is launching on Netflix in 2027, and fans have been eager to hear more about what this cartoon will be about. Recently, Sony unveiled the show’s logo as well as its provocative new name, Ghostbusters: Night Shift. Many are buzzing with excitement, but some can’t help but ask the obvious question: “wait, that’s it?” This cartoon has been in the works for several years now, and the fact that it is still so shrouded in mystery is starting to feel like a very, very bad sign.
A New Take On A Classic Logo
When Sony unveiled the logo for Ghostubers: Night Shift, fans were divided. On the one hand, it’s nice that this logo shares so much in common with the original film logo; most reboots and revivals change so much that we love, so it’s nice to know that this upcoming cartoon isn’t shaking things up too much. On the other hand, the new logo is so close to the original logo that it seems almost odd that they changed it. The changes are also so odd and minimalist (like yellowed teeth and a beastly claw on the ghost) that it seems like a borderline AI creation. The prompt? “Make the Ghostbusters logo look scary.”
Additionally, the subtitle “Night Shift” has caused speculation about who the core Ghostbusters team will be and what the show will be about. The name implies that the cartoon likely won’t follow the original Ghostbusters, who (in addition to being very old) didn’t answer many calls in the wee hours. The show is also unlikely to follow the core crew of Aferlife and Frozen Empire. It’s possible that the new show will go full meta and feature the Ghostbusters as an in-universe franchise. Therefore, we might be following a new team of a local Ghostbusters branch, one that covers the titular night shift.
Trusted Names And Plenty Of Secrets
Aside from the new name and new logo, we know very little about Ghostbusters: Night Shift. The show will be a Netflix exclusive and is set to premiere in 2027, though an exact release date remains unknown. It’s not entirely clear what kind of animation style we are likely to see, either. While the smart money is on the show having the uncanny, CGI-animated look of Netflix’s Stranger Things cartoon, the show may end up with a more traditional 2D style, like the streamer’s steadily-growing list of exclusive anime titles. One thing we do know about Ghostbusters: Night Shift, though, is that it is being made by some names we can trust.
The show is being executive-produced by Dan Aykroyd, the franchise star who originally came up with the idea of the Ghostbusters in the first place. Other EPs include Jason Reitman, Gil Kenan, both of whom co-wrote Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire. Finally, Elliott Kalan is serving as writer and co-showrunner of this new cartoon; if his name doesn’t ring a bell, Kalan has written for The Daily Show and Mystery Science Theater 3000, and he’s the motormouthed, show-stealing cohost of the hit podcast The Flophouse. Kalan is also a comics writer who gave us the often-memed scene where the villainous Sauron tells Spider-Man he’d rather turn people into dinosaurs than cure cancer.
Akyroyd is the OG talent, Reitman is the shepherd of the modern movies, and Kalan is the passionate fan working on his dream franchise. Together, they might just have what it takes to make Ghostbusters: Night Shift into Netflix’s latest killer cartoon. Otherwise, this beloved franchise may fade away and become the worst kind of ghost: one that nobody even cares about watching, much less busting.
Entertainment
Catch This Screwball Comedy Disaster On Netflix Before Its Sequel Hits Theaters
By TeeJay Small
| Updated
If you’ve got your finger on the pulse of the latest comedy outings, you’ve probably already seen trailers for Focker-In-Law. The film, which stars Ben Stiller, Robert De Niro, and Ariana Grande, is the fourth entrant into the Meet The Parents franchise, which launched all the way back in the year 2000. The original Meet The Parents is an iconic comedy which still holds up to this day, and the 2004 follow-up Meet The Fockers is a fun, quirky film that has some solid moments.
Unfortunately, the fun sort of stopped in 2010 when Stiller and De Niro reunited for a third time with Little Fockers. This movie is a pale replica of its predecessors, offering little more than a tepid retread of jokes that were funnier the first time around. Despite the film being a bit of a slog, and Ben Stiller literally assuring fans that they don’t need to rewatch the trilogy to understand the upcoming sequel (he even claims that he doesn’t stand by the third film, per X), I decided to revisit Little Fockers on Netflix.
Move Along, Nothing To See Here!
I recall catching Little Fockers in theaters with my family upon release, and thinking little of it. In the years since, I’ve basically forgotten the entire plot, other than the fact that Gaylord ‘Greg’ Focker (Stiller) and his wife Pam now have children. In the movie, the Fockers are preparing a fifth birthday bash for their twins, when De Niro’s domineering Jack Byrnes drops in for a surprise visit.
Operating in his capacity as a hard-ass father-in-law, as well as a CIA retiree, Jack continually gives Greg a hard time. Jack has never approved of Greg, though extenuating circumstances have forced his hand in anointing him the new family patriarch and the arbiter of the coveted “circle of trust.” This is set in motion because Jack’s other daughter is in the process of getting a divorce, thus ousting the son-in-law that Jack actually enjoys.
Unfortunately, this passing of the torch is interrupted by a series of contrived, awkward situations that mistakenly lead Jack and others to believe Greg is unfaithful. If the plot sounds bare bones, that’s because it exists primarily to be a joke delivery system. If the jokes sound bare bones, it’s because the writers didn’t care about this movie at all when they were working on it.
Disappointing Lack Of Little Fockers
The primary source of comedy in this film stems from the fact that Focker sounds a lot like the F-bomb. If that joke blows your mind, you’ll probably be rolling on the floor by the time the film cuts to credits. If not, you’ll probably be half asleep by the fifth time Robert De Niro drops terms like “The god-Focker” and pauses for raucous applause. There are a few solid comedic beats on occasion, but it really feels like the script could have benefited from an extra draft or two.
If this film has anything going for it, it’s the stacked cast of side characters. Notable performers include Owen Wilson, Dustin Hoffman, Barbara Streisand, and Jessica Alba, but numerous top-notch comedians appear in small bit parts as well. Kevin Hart, Rob Huebel, John DiMaggio, Jordan Peele, and Nick Kroll comprise a few faces that wouldn’t have stood out in 2010, but make for a real DiCaprio-pointing-at-the-TV moment today.
At the end of the day, Little Fockers really doesn’t hold up. As it turns out, that Ben Stiller tweet and the 10 percent Rotten Tomatoes score really weren’t lying to me. This is a minor gripe, but I take umbrage with the fact that the movie doesn’t even focus on the kids all that much. For a film literally titled Little Fockers, I’d expect to see more of those little Fockers running around.
I guess I’m happy that I panned for any flecks of comedy gold within this sludge, if only to ensure that I won’t miss a beat when I queue up to see this comedic team remake the same comedy for the fourth time this November. Even still, you’d be better off brushing up on the first two films and letting your imagination fill in the blanks if and when you watch Focker-In-Law. At least Ariana Grande’s front-and-center billing on the poster implies that the new film will actually deliver on its title.
Little Fockers is currently streaming on Netflix, just in case you’re not willing to take my word for it. The first two films are on there as well, for those interested in turning a trilogy watch-through into a drinking game. Take a shot every time you hear De Niro drop Greg’s name in a silly way, and call it “getting Focked up.”
Entertainment
The Sexy Horror Movie That Was Almost A Documentary
By Steven Nelson
| Published
Delving into the shadowy world of online identity, Cam made waves on Netflix in 2018 as a psychological horror thriller that fuses modern technology’s allure with the age-old dangers of doppelgangers and obsession.
Directed by Daniel Goldhaber, with a script by former webcam model Isa Mazzei, the movie taps into the eerie facets of the digital age, offering a chilling look at how easily our online personas can be ripped from our control.
For those seeking a heart-pounding ride that also pushes them to reflect on the implications of life in a digitized world, Cam beckons with its siren call. Dive into a tale where the line between reality and the virtual realm blurs with every click.
Cam Girls Gonna Cam
Set in the competitive world of cam girls, Cam introduces us to Alice, known online as “Lola.” Portrayed by Madeline Brewer, Alice is an ambitious cam girl seeking to break into the top ranks on her streaming platform, FreeGirlsLive. Every day, she stages creative shows, some intense and others downright bizarre, to climb the leaderboard, pushing the boundaries of her performances to attract more viewers and tips.
However, her relentless pursuit to rank higher takes a nightmarish turn when she unexpectedly finds herself locked out of her account. That’s puzzling enough, but the real shock comes when she realizes “Lola” is still online, streaming away. Only, it isn’t Alice behind Lola’s sessions anymore. A mysterious doppelganger, identical in appearance and mirroring her previous shows perfectly, has taken over her channel.
Desperate to reclaim her identity, Alice dives deep into the underworld of the camming industry. She encounters other models, shady figures, and obsessive fans as she tries to uncover the truth behind her digital twin.
Throughout her journey, Cam intelligently weaves themes of identity theft, the personal cost of online fame, and the dangers of exposing oneself in the vast, anonymous terrain of the internet.
Supporting Alice’s story is an array of characters, including her mother, Lynne (Melora Walters), and younger brother, Jordan (Devin Druid). There’s also Tinker (Patch Darragh), an obsessed fan who might know more than he lets on. Together, these characters enhance the layered narrative of Cam, reflecting different facets of Alice’s life as it spirals out of control.
Cam Started As An Idea For A Documentary
The intriguing narrative of Cam finds its origins not in the realm of fiction, but from real-life experiences. Before it was a psychological thriller, the idea for the film emerged from the actual experiences of its screenwriter, Isa Mazzei.
Mazzei herself was a former cam girl and initially considered making a documentary about the world of online camming based on her personal experiences. The realm of camming, with its blurred lines between the digital and the real, personal and public, seemed ripe for exploration.
The industry’s nuances, combined with its vast audience yet marginal mainstream understanding, made it a subject of potential intrigue for viewers.
However, as Mazzei collaborated with director Daniel Goldhaber (a close friend from college), the duo felt that a fictional narrative could dive deeper into the emotional and psychological experiences of a cam girl, particularly the dissociation and identity challenges one might face.
By shifting gears from a documentary to a thriller, they hoped to capture a broader audience and convey the complexities and perils of the camming world more viscerally. This decision gave birth to Cam, a movie that, while fictional, carries the genuine imprint of Mazzei’s lived experiences, adding an extra layer of authenticity to its story.
Cam is more than just a standard psychological thriller; it’s a riveting exploration of identity, digital duality, and the lengths one might go to reclaim a stolen life in the age of the internet. While some might brush it off as another by-the-numbers suspense flick, the film is a testament to the very real challenges and threats that individuals face in the online world.
Drawing inspiration from real-life experiences, it serves as a cautionary tale, reminding viewers of the fragile balance between our digital personas and our real selves. If you’re in the mood for a film that seamlessly blends suspense with societal reflection, you can stream Cam for free on director Daniel Goldhaber’s website for free as of this writing.
Anthropic’s Fable 5 can make weirdly fun video games with the click of a button
With Title And Logo Revealed, The New Ghostbusters Is Still Shrouded In Mystery
