Entertainment
The Raunchiest, R-Rated Comedy Of The 1980s Can't Be Watched, Erased From Existence
By Robert Scucci
| Published
Growing up in the 90s, you could watch 1984’s Revenge of the Nerds with ease through multiple touch points. If you were fortunate enough to have access to the premium movie channels, you’d catch it in all of its uncensored glory behind your parents’ backs. If you had Comedy Central, you’d bear witness to a stripped-down version that lost the nudity but still got its point across.
These days, Revenge of the Nerds, starring the late, great Robert Carradine, is nowhere to be found. It’s not on streaming, and it’s not available for on-demand purchases or rentals, reportedly because its controversial content makes it less than desirable for modern streaming libraries to showcase.
You can still purchase physical copies of Revenge of the Nerds if it’s missing from your collection, but it’s out of print, with 2018 being the last time it got a release. An average casual viewer who gets the urge to revisit it might not even own a DVD player. Most people no longer do.
On one hand, I understand the sensitivity surrounding that one scene that aged like milk. On the other hand, we live in a world where streaming companies pump out droves of content to cash in on memberships and ad revenue. Heck, Invasion of the Star Creatures goes hard in its careless depiction of Native Americans and remains readily available for modern audiences.
All you really need is a disclaimer at the front of the film stating that “awareness of yesterday’s prejudice and its lasting effects can be enhanced when that prejudice is viewed through the lens of the entertainment that informed it.” Then you let people decide for themselves.
Nobody in their right mind would condone some of the more risqué behavior depicted in Revenge of the Nerds, but its overall messaging is wholesome and empowering in its own twisted way. It’s a film about celebrating your eccentricities and rising above adversity so you can become the fully realized, best version of yourself.
Joke’s On You, It’s Revenge Of The Nerds!
Revenge of the Nerds is a classic underdog story through and through. When Lewis Skolnick (Robert Carradine) and his best friend Gilbert Lowe (Anthony Edwards) arrive at Adams College, they’re immediately ostracized for being nerds.
When the jocks, led by Stan Gable (Ted McGinley), accidentally burn down their own house thanks to a party trick involving high-proof alcohol, a lighter, and highly combustible curtains, Coach Harris (John Goodman) bullies Dean Ulich (David Wohl) into letting them take over the freshman dorms. Nerds like Lewis, Gilbert, Arnold Poindexter (Timothy Busfield), Harold Wormser (Andrew Cassese), Dudley “Booger” Dawson (Curtis Armstrong), Lamar Latrelle (Larry B. Scott), and Toshiro Takashi (Brian Tochi) are relegated to living in the gymnasium until they can join fraternities that will house them.
The problem is that the nerd stigma is wide in scope, so the gang of misfits winds up securing and renovating their own house to the tune of “One Foot in Front of the Other” by Bone Symphony. Thanks to a loophole discovered by Poindexter, they join an all-Black fraternity known as Lambda, Lambda, Lambda, or the Tri-Lambs, on a probationary basis. Despite this progress, they’re still relentlessly bullied, which means they eventually have to stand up for themselves against the Alpha Betas, led by Stan, and the Pi Delta Pis, represented by Stan’s girlfriend, Betty Childs (Julia Montgomery).
At this point in Revenge of the Nerds, it’s game on. To be properly represented by the Greek Council, the nerds need to win the Greek Games, and they might just be smart enough to pull it off. Building toward that triumphant moment, there are panty raids, petty vandalism, and increasingly invasive measures taken in the name of self-preservation, culminating in that one scene.
That One Scene
While most of the antics in Revenge of the Nerds are par for the course in the raunchy R-rated college movie wheelhouse, one scene pushes things too far, and it’s likely the main reason you can’t watch the film online. In it, Lewis plays a prank on Betty that I’ll tastefully refer to as a game of sexual switcheroo. He dresses up in Stan’s costume, approaches her with romantic intent, and succeeds. Betty, initially surprised and understandably upset, ultimately expresses admiration when she learns that all jocks ever think about is sports, while all nerds ever think about is sex.
Don’t get this twisted. It’s a bad scene. It’s deceptive, it objectifies women, and it’s executed in bad faith. However, I don’t think the intention of Revenge of the Nerds was to celebrate that behavior. Like I said earlier, the humor was informed by the cultural zeitgeist that spawned it. To an extent, people acted like this. I’m not glad they did. But if art imitates life, then there’s a kernel of truth in Revenge of the Nerds about the terrible decisions unsupervised young adults can make on a college campus.
Even as a kid, the scene rubbed me the wrong way. It’s not a good look, and it doesn’t do the nerds any favors because it brings them down to the jocks’ level in how they’re depicted as villains. On its own, it’s tasteless. Then you remember that just a few scenes earlier, the nerds rigged the Pi Delta Pi house with video cameras to spy on them and snap nude photos that end up lining the pie tins they sell at the Greek Games, which is also in poor taste, but again, a product of its time, like Porky’s, which we still have digital access to.
Reprehensible, But A Product Of Its Time
No well-adjusted adult celebrates Revenge of the Nerds for those scenes specifically, but they happened, and they exist. They’re hard to watch, yes, but isn’t it also a good thing that we’ve come far enough as a society to recognize the errors of our ways? It’s a conversation worth having about our relationship with media and how older intellectual property can be out of date when it tackles topics like how we treat each other.
If anything, removing “Revenge of the Nerds” from the streaming lexicon does us a disservice, because we lose the context that allows these conversations to happen. It’s a cinematic benchmark of where we came from, something we can measure against where we are now. Without that benchmark, we’re less likely to bow our heads in shame and say we’ll do better.
For that reason alone, it’s a shame that Robert Carradine’s triumphant movie about overcoming adversity can’t be easily accessed. Some aspects of the film didn’t age well, sure, but its messaging, and that one scene notwithstanding, still lands as positive and empowering by the time the credits roll.
As of this writing, Revenge of the Nerds cannot be streamed or purchased digitally.
Entertainment
NASAs incredible new telescope will offer an atlas of the universe
NASA has completed its next space observatory, built to create sharp, panoramic maps of the universe while revealing how the most mysterious, invisible substances and distant worlds shape the cosmos.
About a quarter-century after the Hubble Telescope reshaped astronomy, and a few years into the era of the James Webb Space Telescope, NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope will join them not as a replacement, but as a big-picture partner. Where Hubble and Webb zoom in for close‑ups, Roman will capture Hubble‑like detail across areas about 100 times larger, turning isolated snapshots into sweeping surveys that show the very scaffolding of the universe.
At NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, engineers are wrapping up prelaunch testing on the cutting-edge telescope. Next, the observatory will travel 900 miles to Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida, where teams will prepare it for launch.
That could happen as early as this September, about eight months ahead of schedule, NASA managers said at a news conference on Tuesday, April 21. Once in space, Roman will head to a stable orbit about 1 million miles from Earth, near the same region where Webb orbits the sun, and begin a years‑long campaign of deep space imaging.
“We didn’t want to wait to launch the Nancy Grace Roman. We’re eight months ahead of schedule,” said Nicky Fox, NASA’s associate administrator of science. “Everybody felt the urgency. Everybody was sprinting towards this.”
Named for Nancy Grace Roman, who became the agency’s first chief of astronomy and one of its earliest female executives, the telescope reflects a legacy of opening new windows on the universe from above Earth’s atmosphere. Nicknamed the “mother of Hubble,” Roman helped lay the groundwork in the 1960s for a whole fleet of space telescopes.
A wide shot of the dark universe
At the heart of the mission is Roman’s eight-foot-wide mirror, the same size as Hubble’s, paired with a powerful camera that sees in infrared light, like Webb. That camera’s field of view is Roman’s superpower. In a single shot, it can image vast swaths of sky that Hubble simply can’t match.
Because a space telescope can only see one patch of sky at a time, it has to take many separate “pointings” — individual shots aimed at slightly different spots — and stitch them together into a mosaic.
In 2023, Ami Choi, an astrophysicist and scientist for Roman’s wide field camera, contrasted the difference between Hubble and the new telescope. To photograph the Andromeda Galaxy, Hubble has to take 400 smaller images and stitch them together. For Roman’s camera, that should only take two pointings, she said.
This wide, sharp vision is what scientists need to study the so-called “dark universe.” Ordinary matter — the stuff that makes up stars, planets, and even people — accounts for only about 5 percent of the cosmos. The bulk of it is dark matter and dark energy, which do not emit light but leave clues where they’ve influenced space’s expansion and the arrangement of galaxies.
Mashable Light Speed
“Current observations hint that our standard model of the universe is incorrect,” said Julie McHenry, senior project scientist, referring to cosmologists’ best recipe for the universe. “Roman will be able to confirm these and set us on the path to understanding what’s right.”
Roman will trace those clues in several ways at once. By mapping the positions and shapes of hundreds of millions of galaxies, it will show how structures have grown from the early universe to today. Subtle distortions in galaxy shapes will reveal how clumps of invisible space stuff bend their light on the way to us, exposing the hidden dark matter. At the same time, Roman will discover and track large numbers of a special kind of exploding star, known as Type Ia supernovas; their predictable brightness lets astronomers measure how quickly space has expanded over time.
Imaging large space targets, such as the Andromeda Galaxy, will require far fewer smaller images to stitch together than other flagship observatories.
Credit: NASA composite image
Taken together, these measurements will allow scientists to test competing ideas about dark matter, dark energy, and even the laws of gravity themselves with far greater precision than ever before. Other observatories can make similar kinds of measurements, but none combines Roman’s sharpness and sky coverage in the infrared, NASA mission leaders say, which lets it see more distant and dust-covered galaxies.
A new census of distant exoplanets
Roman’s wide‑field power also makes it skilled at exoplanet hunting. Previous missions like Kepler and TESS mostly found planets close to their stars, where their repeated crossings dim starlight in a regular rhythm. Roman will focus on a different region of planetary systems: the cooler, outer zones, where worlds similar to Jupiter and Saturn reside. It may even find wandering planets that aren’t tethered to stars.
To do this, Roman will repeatedly monitor dense star fields toward the center of our Milky Way. As a foreground star passes in front of a more distant one, its gravity will briefly magnify the background star’s light. If the foreground star carries planets, they can produce smaller, telltale blips in that brightening. This technique, called microlensing, works best in precisely the kind of crowded, faint, and distant regions that Roman is expected to capture.
Optical Engineer Bente Eegholm inspects the primary mirror for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope.
Credit: NASA / Chris Gunn
Over its mission, Roman will attempt to record thousands of these microlensing events, revealing planets at distances and masses other surveys mostly miss. From that haul, astronomers will compare our solar system’s architecture with many others and judge whether having inner rocky worlds and outer giant planets is the status quo or something more rare.
Roman will also test an advanced coronagraph — a system of masks and mirrors that blocks a star’s glare so the telescope can try to see the faint glow of planets around it. On Roman, this is more of a technology trial than an everyday science instrument, but if it works, it will set the stage for a future observatory whose main goal is to directly image Earth‑like worlds around other sun‑like stars.
“What astronomers can do today with coronagraph instruments is see planets that are maybe a million times fainter than their stars,” Vanessa Bailey, NASA’s Roman coronagraph scientist, told Mashable. “What we’re doing with the Roman coronagraph is hopefully getting to 10 million to 100 million times fainter, maybe even a little bit more, in the best case scenario.”
Catching the universe in motion
Roman is also built for studying how the sky changes, creating a veritable library of “before” and “after” shots.
Technicians assemble the solar panels on the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope.
Credit: NASA / Sydney Rohde
One of its major surveys will repeatedly scan high‑latitude regions of the sky, away from the plane of the Milky Way. By returning to the same fields every few days, Roman will catch supernovas as they ignite and fade, watch black holes light up as they feed on nearby material, and uncover other short-lived, dramatic events across the distant universe. Its infrared vision will reveal explosions and flares that dust clouds hide from visible‑light telescopes.
Another core program will stare toward the Milky Way’s central bulge. There, Roman will track how the brightness of millions of stars rises and falls on timescales of minutes to months. Those records will not only power the microlensing planet search but also expose other phenomena, such as neutron stars and black holes.
Because Roman will cover such large areas with fine detail, its images will also become a long‑lasting reference tool. When other telescopes later spot something odd — a burst of high‑energy radiation, for instance, or an unusual variable star — astronomers will be able to pull Roman’s earlier images and see what was there before the excitement.
“The images it captures will be so large there is not a screen in existence large enough to show them,” said NASA administrator Jared Isaacman. “Roman will give the Earth a new Atlas of the universe. I think it’s worth pausing for a moment just to think about how really incredible that is.”
Entertainment
400K MagSafe power banks recalled after fatal fire, the 10th power bank recall in a year
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and Casely reannounced a power bank recall this April after a fire linked to the device fatally injured a user. This is the tenth power bank recall in the United States in the last 12 months, and Anker recalled 1.5 million power banks in 2025.
The recall affects an estimated 429,200 Casely 5,000-mAh MagSafe Power Pods (Model E33A), which were originally recalled in 2025. The MagSafe power banks need to be completely replaced.
Back of Casely power banks.
Credit: CPSC
Affected customers should stop using the portable power banks immediately. They can also contact Casely to receive a free replacement.
“The recalled lithium-ion battery in the power banks can overheat and ignite, posing risk of serious injury or death from fire and burn hazards to consumers,” the CPSC stated on its recall website.
Mashable Light Speed
The Brooklyn-based company is reannouncing the recall after receiving 51 reports of the lithium-ion battery overheating, expanding, and/or catching fire while charging smartphones, “resulting in six minor burn injuries.”
However, in the past year, the CPSC says 28 more reports have been made, including explosions that caused a serious accident on an airplane and one death.
In August 2024, a 75-year-old woman from New Jersey, was charging her cell phone with the power bank on her lap when it caught on fire and exploded. The victim suffered second and third degree burns and later passed away from complications from her injuries. In February 2026, a 47-year-old woman was charging her cell phone with the power bank on an airplane when it caught on fire and exploded, resulting in the victim suffering first degree burns.
How to check your Casely Power Pod
Worried you may own one of the 429,000 recalled power banks? It’s easy to check if your device is included in the recall.
On the back of the device, look for the device’s model number, as show in a picture provided by the CPSC. If the model number reads “E33A,” then stop using the device immediately.
Look for the model number.
Credit: CPSC
More information on requesting a replacement power bank is available on the CPSC and Casely recall websites.
Entertainment
The new Dyson Supersonic Travel is the cheapest Supersonic yet
Table of Contents
Nearly three years ago, I asked if the (then) $429 Dyson Supersonic was still worth the price of entry.
These days, with the Supersonic line having expanded, the standard model having increased in price to $449.99, and the most expensive version of the hair dryer topping out at $549.99, it’s a question that feels even more apt.
The good news? If you’re not super into the idea of spending about $500 for a hair dryer, Dyson just announced the Dyson Supersonic Travel, a $299.99 model of its famous hair tool. In addition to its lower price point, it comes with more travel-friendly proportions and features.
As someone who’s personally tested Supersonics (and their many dupes), I took a closer look at the latest Dyson beauty launch to gather everything you need to know.
The design differences of the Dyson Supersonic Travel
In short, the Supersonic Travel is the standard Supersonic but smaller. According to Dyson, that comes out to exactly 32 percent smaller and 25 percent lighter than the OG Supersonic. In other words, it’s 0.7 pounds to the standard Supersonic’s 1.8 pounds, and 8.7 inches tall to the larger model’s 10 inches.
Mashable Trend Report
This model also comes with one attachment, the styling concentrator, a la the now-discontinued Dyson Supersonic Origin (which ran for $399.99). For comparison, the $449.99 Supersonic comes with three attachments: a styling concentrator, diffuser, and wide-tooth comb. For all five attachments, you’ll have to shell out $549.99.
The Supersonic Travel is compatible with all original and Supersonic Nural attachments.
Credit: Dyson
The same attachments can be used between the Travel, original, and Supersonic Nural dryers. This means opting for the Travel could technically save you some money — individual attachments range from $19.99 to $44.99. If you only use a styling concentrator and diffuser, for instance, the total cost of a Travel dryer with the extra attachment purchase would come out to $344.98, making it still over $100 cheaper than the three-attachment original Supersonic.
The Supersonic Travel is more versatile in some ways, and less so in others
Functionality-wise, the Supersonic Travel is a slightly different product from the other Supersonics in the line. It has anywhere from 1,000 to 1,220 watts of power and an airflow speed of 11.6 liters per second, compared to the 1,600 watts and 13.3 liters per second of the standard Supersonic. In other words, the bigger dryer is slightly more powerful, so it wouldn’t be unreasonable to expect longer dry times.
The standard Supersonic and Supersonic Nural also feature four heats and three air speeds, where the Supersonic Travel features three heats and two air speeds.
The best noise-cancelling headphones for flying: 8 picks to improve your travel experience
That said, the Supersonic Travel has universal voltage compatibility, so it can be used from 100 to 240 volts, whereas the other Supersonics are locked into 120 volt compatibility.
In terms of its portability, it’s also worth noting the Supersonic Travel weighs the same as the Supersonic r, a professional grade hair dryer (priced as such at $549.99) that’s become more popular due in part to being lightweight and easy to maneuver.
Where to buy the Dyson Supersonic Travel
The Dyson Supersonic Travel is available for $299.99 at Dyson’s website, Amazon, and Best Buy. If you buy at the former, you will receive a complimentary $59.99 travel bag along with the hair dryer.
NASAs incredible new telescope will offer an atlas of the universe
400K MagSafe power banks recalled after fatal fire, the 10th power bank recall in a year
