Entertainment
R-Rated 90s Sci-Fi Actioner Is The Wildest RoboCop Ripoff You Never Heard Of
By Robert Scucci
| Published

If you’ve ever found yourself watching RoboCop and wondering if there was a crappier version starring Billy Blanks, I’d point you to 1993’s TC 2000. That’s right, the Tae Bo guy leads a dystopian sci-fi action flick in which his partner becomes a ruthless killing machine with only fragmented memories of her past life. Cybersecurity is compromised, government buildings are leveled, and the fate of humanity hangs in the balance. Thankfully, we get enough montages involving flexed muscles and shadowboxing to reassure us that, after all is said and done, everything will be right in the world.
TC 2000, despite its sloppy mixed martial arts messaging, remains an entertaining entry in writer-director T.J. Scott’s filmography, and for his first feature-length project, it certainly has legs. Those legs belong to Billy Blanks, who unflinchingly steps up as the action hero nobody asked for and commits fully to the premise.
Humans Vs. Cyborgs Vs … Picasso?

Set in an underground city in the year 2020, TC 2000 centers on an elite police force designed to protect the wealthy from the remaining surface dwellers, who are always looking for a way into their heavily fortified community. Jason Storm (Billy Blanks) and his partner Zoey Kinsella (Bobbie Phillips) work as Tracker-Communicators, or TCs, whose sole purpose is to keep the riff raff out of the compound. When the community’s force field is breached by common citizens who just want a safe place to rest their heads, Zoey suspects they were given intel from the inside, meaning the city is no longer secure.
Through exchanges between Jason and his superior, The Controller (Ramsay Smith), we learn that, with the help of his muscle man Bigalow (Matthias Hues), he plans to replace TCs with the next iteration of cybernetically infused enforcers known as TC-Xs.

When gang leader Niki Picasso (Jalal Merhi) infiltrates the city with the intention of seizing whatever pre-collapse firepower is hidden within its walls, Zoey is killed and secretly converted into a TC-X by The Controller. He programs her to gain Picasso’s trust through seduction, intending to infiltrate another gang known as the Lifers, who guard a research facility he wants to claim.
Exiled from the force and framed for his partner’s murder, Jason needs a training montage to restore balance and properly confront The Controller. With the help of his mentor, Master Sumai (Bolo Yeung), Jason learns the facility was once owned by Zoey’s father to repair the environment, but has since been converted into a chemical weapons manufacturing plant. Now guarded by Zoey, who has been programmed to assassinate her former partner, breaching the factory seems impossible for anyone but Jason Storm.
A Martial Arts Showcase

While TC 2000 leaves plenty to be desired in terms of on-screen chemistry, special effects, truly menacing villains, and meaningful internal conflict between Jason Storm and his superiors, it more than makes up for its lack of depth with its fight sequences. Billy Blanks tries his hardest to be a leading man and action hero, and the effort is commendable, but he is just not that guy. He can throw hands and roundhouse kick as well as Jean-Claude Van Damme, but he lacks the charisma needed to carry the show alone.
As for the evil forces at play, Picasso may go down as one of the least threatening villains in cinema history. He listens to records and struts around like he is a badass, but if I am being honest, I kept waiting for him to clutch his pearls and yell “curses!” upon defeat. What I anticipated is not too far off from what actually happens in TC 2000.


If you head over to Tubi and fire up TC 2000, you might find yourself drifting during the expository scenes. When the fights ramp up, though, it is worth your time if you love a good old-fashioned cybernetic beatdown. It’s cheesy but it’s charming. It’s sloppy, but it’s fun. It’s best not to take this one too seriously, because it will ruin the experience.
Entertainment
NYT Connections hints today: Clues, answers for July 23, 2026
The NYT Connections puzzle today is not too difficult if you’re a frequent flyer.
Connections is the one of the most popular New York Times word games that’s captured the public’s attention. The game is all about finding the “common threads between words.” And just like Wordle, Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier—so we’ve served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle.
If you just want to be told today’s puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for today’s Connections solution. But if you’d rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.
What is Connections?
The NYT‘s latest daily word game has become a social media hit. The Times credits associate puzzle editor Wyna Liu with helping to create the new word game and bringing it to the publications’ Games section. Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there’s only one correct answer.
If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake—players get up to four mistakes until the game ends.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media.
Mashable Top Stories
Here’s a hint for today’s Connections categories
Want a hint about the categories without being told the categories? Then give these a try:
-
Yellow: Rounded
-
Green: Nervous Nancy
-
Blue: Catch a flight
-
Purple: Math words
Meet The Mashable 101: Our list of the content creators shaping the internet today
Here are today’s Connections categories
Need a little extra help? Today’s connections fall into the following categories:
-
Yellow: Spherical things
-
Green: In an anxious state
-
Blue: Parts of an airport
-
Purple: Ending in geometry terms
Looking for Wordle today? Here’s the answer to today’s Wordle.
Ready for the answers? This is your last chance to turn back and solve today’s puzzle before we reveal the solutions.
Drumroll, please!
The solution to today’s Connections #1138 is…
What is the answer to Connections today
-
Spherical things: BASEBALL, GLOBE,
-
In an anxious state: EXCITED, FEBRILE, FRENETIC, INTENSE
-
Parts of an airport: PINS, SNAPS, TWEETS, VINES
-
Ending in geometry terms: APPOINT, DEPLANE, FELINE, JANGLE
Are you also playing NYT Strands? Get all the Strands hints you need for today’s puzzle.
If you’re looking for more puzzles, Mashable’s got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.
Not the day you’re after? Here’s the solution to yesterday’s Connections.
Entertainment
NYT Strands hints, answers for July 23, 2026
Today’s NYT Strands hints are easy if you’re a veteran.
Strands, the New York Times‘ elevated word-search game, requires the player to perform a twist on the classic word search. Words can be made from linked letters — up, down, left, right, or diagonal, but words can also change direction, resulting in quirky shapes and patterns. Every single letter in the grid will be part of an answer. There’s always a theme linking every solution, along with the “spangram,” a special, word or phrase that sums up that day’s theme, and spans the entire grid horizontally or vertically.
By providing an opaque hint and not providing the word list, Strands creates a brain-teasing game that takes a little longer to play than its other games, like Wordle and Connections.
If you’re feeling stuck or just don’t have 10 or more minutes to figure out today’s puzzle, we’ve got all the NYT Strands hints for today’s puzzle you need to progress at your preferred pace.
NYT Strands hint for today’s theme: Hail to the chief petty officer
The words are related to the military.
Mashable Top Stories
Today’s NYT Strands theme plainly explained
These words describe military titles.
NYT Strands spangram hint: Is it vertical or horizontal?
Today’s NYT Strands spangram is vertical.
Meet The Mashable 101: Our list of the content creators shaping the internet today
NYT Strands spangram answer today
Today’s spangram is Navy Ranks.
NYT Strands word list for July 23
-
Recruit
-
Admiral
-
Ensign
-
Navy Ranks
-
Lieutenant
-
Commander
Looking for other daily online games? Mashable’s Games page has more hints, and if you’re looking for more puzzles, Mashable’s got games now!
Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.
Not the day you’re after? Here’s the solution to yesterday’s Strands.
Entertainment
The World’s Richest Man Just Promised An AI Version Of The Odyssey, But It’s Never Going To Happen
By Chris Snellgrove
| Published

Every day, we get another reminder that the internet isn’t real life. For example, right-wing voices have been hating on Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey for months, backlash that mysteriously began when the director cast a Black woman and a trans man in prominent roles. The haters spent plenty of time, energy, and endless social media posts trashing the film and predicting it would fail because it’s woke garbage. Of course, when the movie actually premiered, it was a critical darling that made over a quarter of a billion dollars in its first weekend.
In a sane world, that would have ended the discussion. The movie thousands of people thought would fail succeeded; end of story, right? Well, you’re not in a sane world, bucko, you’re in Hellworld. Case in point? Spurred on by comments from his loyal army of sycophantic followers, Elon Musk has now pledged to use his pet AI Grok to create a more “historically accurate” version of The Odyssey. His fans are excited, but I’ve got some bad news: not only would such a film be a critical and commercial flop, but there’s no way in hell this movie ever comes out.
The Odyssey: Video Game Cutscene Edition
Why am I so confident that Elon Musk’s Grok-powered version of The Odyssey will never come out? Simple: while Musk has achieved massive financial success (he was, for a moment there, the world’s first trillionaire), he has spent much of the last decade promising things that just never happened. Like, he previously promised SpaceX would be landing humans on Mars by 2025 at the latest; not only did that never happen, but SpaceX’s stock value is currently tumbling following several engine failures and an aborted flight.
The list goes on. Fully self-driving cars straight out of a sci-fi movie? He made the promise, but that never happened. The Hyperloop, announced in 2013? The project shut down in 2023. The pledge to have a million robotaxis on the streets by 2020? Yeah, that project died quietly amid the global COVID-19 pandemic. For all of his successes, this is who Elon Musk is: a relentless hypeman who promises more than he can deliver and tries to cover up his failures with more breathless announcements that he thinks his biggest fans will respond well to.
This AI Movie Is Its Own Trojan Horse

That’s what this AI Odyssey announcement is about. After years of being lauded by liberal fans as a real-life Tony Stark, Musk went fully right-wing, complete with pivotal endorsements of Donald Trump and a temporary role in Trump’s government. As such, Musk has become one of the most popular figures in conservative circles. While his political allegiances shifted, one thing never changed: Musk’s absolutely palpable desire for people to like him. Accordingly, he spends plenty of time on X, engaging with conservative fans and platforming both conservative thoughts and movies (like Citizen Vigilante). By and large, his fans hate Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey, so he has pledged to give them an alternative.
Once again, Musk is telling his fans what they want to hear. Hate that “woke” movie everyone’s talking about? Well, he’ll make his own, and he’ll do it without help from Hollywood! That’s the promise, at least, and Musk’s fans are eating this up with a fork and spoon. None of them seem to think that this project, like so many others, will quietly disappear. Or that the man who has spent years running a social media platform into the ground might not actually be the best guy to deliver an actual film and not sloppy shorts that look like a PS4 cutscene.
Elon Musk’s Movie Is Already History

But let’s say, for the sake of argument, that Musk actually makes his more “historically accurate” version of The Odyssey. Why does anyone think this thing will be watchable, much less better than Christopher Nolan’s version? Not only does the proof of concept suck, but Musk’s rejection of Hollywood has seriously reduced his talent pool for things like voice acting, art design, and so on. Plus, the very announcement brings up an obvious question: why has Musk given himself until the end of the year to make this film? Nolan shot a real movie with real people in only three months, so why will it take Grok’s prompt engineers almost twice as long to make their own?
The answer is simple: this movie is never going to see the light of day. Elon Musk’s biggest fans are frothing at the mouth about Nolan’s The Odyssey right now, but soon enough, they’ll have something new to obsess over, like Spider-Man saying something too woke in Brand New Day. As they move on, the once and future (?) trillionaire will move on as well, making even more promises he never plans to keep. With any luck, all of the people demanding an AI version of The Odyssey will start clamoring for an AI adaptation of another ancient text. May I suggest The Bible, complete with a historically accurate, very brown Jesus Christ?
